Saturday | October 1, 2016
Popular Links:
Palit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Graphics Card Review

Palit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Graphics Card Review

Palit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Sonic Platinum Edition Graphics Card Review

Test System and Methodology

Palit GeForce GTX 560 1GB Sonic Platinum
Radeon 6850 1GB (820/1100)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 1GB

Intel Core i7-990X

Gigabyte X58A-UD7

3x David Foster Wallace Cruise Ship Essay 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1600 (9-9-9-24-2T)

Master Thesis How Corsair AX1200W PSU Dissertation Convaincre Persuader OCZ RevoDrive X2
2x Define Thesis Dissertation WD VelociRaptor Hard Drives
Arctic Cooling MX-4 Paste
Homework Help Writing Essay Corsair H70 CPU Cooler Does Homework Help Students Learn Better Lian Li PC-X2000F Case
3x Dissertation Droit Administratif Mthodologie Asus VG236 1920×1080 120Hz Screen Average Time To Complete A Masters Thesis Roccat Kone[+] Phd Thesis Sites SteelSeries Shift

Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1
DirectX 9/10/11 (Nov 2010) Help Me Write A Speech
Catalyst 11.5a

Forceware 275.20 Writing A Dissertation Prospectus Crysis 2
Dragon Age 2 Dissertation Writing Pdf
Total War: Shogun 2
F1 2010
Portal 2

3DMark 2011 Professional
Unigene Heaven Benchmark 2.5

PowerDVD 11 Ultra
Cyberlink MediaExpresso 6.5

The test system was built from scratch, a format of the hard drive was performed (NTFS) and then Windows 7 was installed. Following the completion of the installation, the video drivers were installed. All windows updates were then installed as were the latest builds of the benchmarking tools. Finally, the hard drives were de-fragmented. For each test, the video drivers were set to default quality/optimizations (unless otherwise stated).

Good Benchmarking Practice
Where possible, each benchmark was performed three times and the median result for each resolution/setting is shown in the tables that will follow. All applications had their latest patches applied and all hardware features the latest BIOS/Firmware.

Hardware Heaven does not use benchmark scripts. We play the games for long periods of time on various levels and report any unusual findings we see. Then we record with FRAPS across several in game levels recording the averages. This is real world testing and is just how you guys will experience the game. These results give the reader balanced and directly comparable set of figures for comparing cards.

One of the most important aspects of enjoying a game is minimum frame rates which can have the greatest impact on the gaming experience. Due to this we also include a separate graph which details the framerates every second during a level for each of the tested games. This framerate graph allows us to show you how stable the framerates are in on a product and how often they rise towards the maximum or fall to the minimum level. We have also incorporated a ‘red line’ at the 25 frame per second mark to show the ‘cut off’ point that most people find acceptable – if you see the current frame rate line drop below this then you can expect the game to become choppy.

Essentially it gives a good representation of the experience you will have when playing. For these tests we focus on a worst case scenario, the most demanding section of game that we can find.

NOTE: As the expanded framerate graph is based on a single run of real world gameplay before we take into account multiple results there can be some variation between identical cards. We make every effort to keep the test as repeatable as possible however with advancements in game technology identical single results are often impossible.

About Author

Stuart Davidson