|
|||||||
| AMD Graphics Cards Discuss AMD/ATI Radeon Graphics Cards from the current 6000 Series, upcoming 7000? series right back to the ATI Radeon 9700 Pro and earlier! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
X1650XT or X1950PRO
Anybody got any thoughts to which card would be better? I am looking for a fairly inexpensive way to upgrade my system and wasn't sure which was the better deal? Also do they make the X1950XTX for AGP?
FlyBoyd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
oops
Last edited by FlyBoyd; Jan 21, 2007 at 01:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Another quick question. Heres how I understand the specs.
X1650XT Interface - 128bit Pixel Pipes - 24 Vertex - 8 X1950Pro Interface - 256bit Pixel Pipes - 36 Vertex - 8 Are those numbers more important or the core clock speed? How do I translate those numbers into performance. Thanks for the help. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
DriverHeaven Addict
|
Quote:
the X1950Pro has 12 pixel Pipes and 36 pixel shader processors. The X1950Pro is the faster AGP card around. I don't know much about the X1650XT cause I don't follow the low/mid range cards much,but someone here will tell you more or read a review or 2 about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Going Insane.....
|
the X1950PRO is the way to go, theres also going to be an X1950XT for agp no XTX tho, the 1650 is sorta junk since it only has a 128 bit memory interface, and the pro has 256, there doesnt seem to be a way to convert numbers to real time performance, only to bench them.... thats y we got review sites like this to go for.
the X1950PRO is the MUCH better deal here
__________________
Hardwareheaven Super-Moderator last updated (5/18/11)
Rosewill FUTURE case replaces CM 690 II with its greater interior length. Written by Kristopher Pedemonte and Nathan Marks-Forder Edited by Allan Campbell Questions or Comments? feel free to post them in the forums! ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
I wouldn't give the x1650 any further consideration. If you can get a X1950, go for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,794
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Don't make me hungry.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Weyburn, Saskatchewan
Posts: 4,319
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
banned
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,677
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
X1950
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|