ASIO 24/96 for emu10k1

monohouse · May 9, 2004, 03:47 PM

it's good to have support for 24/96 in the emu10k2 too bad that I don't have the card lol

I would like to ask if there is planned support for emu10k1 24/96 ?

if not I want to know if when I link a 24/96 output channel from the Fxbus to the "Rec" of the epilog and use recording software to record that sound :

does the recorded sound is 24/96 or is it resampled to 16/44.1 ?

I have a CT4832 emu10k1 Sb live value!

miguel · May 9, 2004, 04:09 PM

emu10k2 cards have dedicated circuitry to achive that.

monohouse · May 9, 2004, 04:12 PM

I see

, is there a way for me to be able to work at 24/96 ?

I fear that because of the lack of support for asio 24/96 in emu10k1 the sound is resampled back from 24/96 into 16/44.1 when software record it.

monohouse · May 9, 2004, 04:16 PM

sorry I think I confused here - I need ASIO OUTPUT in 24/96 not input, SORRY !

the whole idea is to be able to record programs that output sound in 24/96 into the computer

Doomsayer · May 9, 2004, 04:19 PM

Nope, your card can only do 16/48. Even on Audigy 2 the 24/96 mode is bound to many limitations. But the benefits of 24/96 are actually relatively minor, especially on Creative cards

monohouse · May 9, 2004, 04:21 PM

this sucks

, but why does my card support 24/96 ?

is it a joke ?

miguel · May 10, 2004, 09:16 AM

the driver, for compatibility reasons might accept many formats that the hardware does no support natively, so you can be sure somewhere down the line there's a software and/or hardware conversion. You should do both playback and record at 16/48 for cleanest audio and best performance

monohouse · May 11, 2004, 04:05 PM

any ideas how I can check and verify any conversions done with any programs ?

does it mean that software playback > software record will also loose quality ?
cause I don't care much at the moment for the hardware, if the driver supports and passes the digital data
as it is then it should be fine, the rest can be taken care of later when I have the hardware.

**dj_stick** · May 12, 2004, 12:13 PM

the card itself will resample every thing that is sent to it… you simply cannot truly record anything other than 16/48 with kX, even that signal is resampled (to sync with the cards clock)

monohouse · May 13, 2004, 07:36 PM

:/

.
.
.

thanks, now that we're finished with this subject...

what card is best for 24/96 ?

I've heard there are those APS, wtf is it ?

also, what do you think of professional audio cards ? any special companies/models that are good ?

**dj_stick** · May 13, 2004, 10:00 PM

APS is the very first ever 10k1 board release by e-mu… best kX card for 24/96 when it is supported is the audigy 2 series

monohouse · May 18, 2004, 08:02 PM

which audigy2 is best then ? .....there are so many versions ..........

**dj_stick** · May 19, 2004, 07:30 AM

depends on ur finance and needs… pretty much any a2 will be fine

monohouse · May 23, 2004, 11:58 AM

then, what are the differences of which I should be aware ?

monohouse · May 23, 2004, 12:05 PM

..hehe - you have a chool site

I hope you don't mind me takin a visit....

**dj_stick** · May 23, 2004, 01:03 PM

the differences between the audigy 2 models are the ins and outs
audigy 2 are 6.1, where as audigy 2 zs are 7.1, and the platinum/ex/pro versions have a drive bay/external i/o box

monohouse · Nov 7, 2007, 12:14 PM

necromancy: but do they all have 3 analog stereo outputs ? I heard that the non-platinum/pro/ex versions have a mutch lower SNR at the subwoofer analog output ?

May 9, 2004, 03:47 PM	#1
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	ASIO 24/96 for emu10k1 it's good to have support for 24/96 in the emu10k2 too bad that I don't have the card lol I would like to ask if there is planned support for emu10k1 24/96 ? if not I want to know if when I link a 24/96 output channel from the Fxbus to the "Rec" of the epilog and use recording software to record that sound : does the recorded sound is 24/96 or is it resampled to 16/44.1 ? I have a CT4832 emu10k1 Sb live value! Last edited by monohouse; May 9, 2004 at 04:09 PM.

May 9, 2004, 04:12 PM	Thread Starter #3
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	I see , is there a way for me to be able to work at 24/96 ? I fear that because of the lack of support for asio 24/96 in emu10k1 the sound is resampled back from 24/96 into 16/44.1 when software record it. Last edited by monohouse; May 9, 2004 at 04:19 PM.

May 9, 2004, 04:09 PM	#2
miguel DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 209 Rep Power: 0	emu10k2 cards have dedicated circuitry to achive that.

May 9, 2004, 04:16 PM	Thread Starter #4
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	sorry I think I confused here - I need ASIO OUTPUT in 24/96 not input, SORRY ! the whole idea is to be able to record programs that output sound in 24/96 into the computer

May 9, 2004, 04:19 PM	#5
Doomsayer DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Latvia Posts: 154 Rep Power: 0	Nope, your card can only do 16/48. Even on Audigy 2 the 24/96 mode is bound to many limitations. But the benefits of 24/96 are actually relatively minor, especially on Creative cards

May 9, 2004, 04:21 PM	Thread Starter #6
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	this sucks , but why does my card support 24/96 ? is it a joke ?

May 10, 2004, 09:16 AM	#7
miguel DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Aug 2003 Posts: 209 Rep Power: 0	the driver, for compatibility reasons might accept many formats that the hardware does no support natively, so you can be sure somewhere down the line there's a software and/or hardware conversion. You should do both playback and record at 16/48 for cleanest audio and best performance

May 11, 2004, 04:05 PM	Thread Starter #8
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	any ideas how I can check and verify any conversions done with any programs ? does it mean that software playback > software record will also loose quality ? cause I don't care much at the moment for the hardware, if the driver supports and passes the digital data as it is then it should be fine, the rest can be taken care of later when I have the hardware.

May 13, 2004, 07:36 PM	Thread Starter #10
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	:/ . . . thanks, now that we're finished with this subject... what card is best for 24/96 ? I've heard there are those APS, wtf is it ? also, what do you think of professional audio cards ? any special companies/models that are good ?

May 18, 2004, 08:02 PM	Thread Starter #12
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	which audigy2 is best then ? .....there are so many versions ..........

May 23, 2004, 11:58 AM	Thread Starter #14
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	then, what are the differences of which I should be aware ?

May 23, 2004, 12:05 PM	Thread Starter #15
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	..hehe - you have a chool site I hope you don't mind me takin a visit....

Nov 7, 2007, 12:14 PM	Thread Starter #17
monohouse HardwareHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 60 Rep Power: 0	necromancy: but do they all have 3 analog stereo outputs ? I heard that the non-platinum/pro/ex versions have a mutch lower SNR at the subwoofer analog output ?