Audigy 2 24-bit/96kHz ASIO 2.0 Recording support

synthsmith · Dec 7, 2004, 01:29 PM

According to Creative's website,on Feb 2004,
only SBAudigy2Plat.Pro had --> ASIO 2.0 Low Latency Multi-Track [color=red]Recording [/color]Support (24-bit/96kHz)
See here

But now, after Audigy4's release, the website's comparision chart shows all the members of the Audigy2 family can do 24bit/96kHz ASIO 2.0 Recording.
See here
Please see the pics here , where I have marked
Old comparison
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...comparison.jpg
New comparison
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...comparison.jpg
Because you guys are extreme driver developers

, I believe you will have the perfect answer

Samir · Dec 7, 2004, 01:50 PM

Seems that they were working long & hard on 24/96 ASIO support for Audigy2 ZS / Audigy 2 value....

For how long, year & half?

Mr_sampler · Jan 11, 2005, 11:01 AM

RESAMPLING

What the comparison charts don't tell is RESAMPLING!.
My most educated guess tells me that ONLY the zs platinum pro avoids it at 96khz:
At this frequncy, all the others will resample "internally" to 48khz ..and that the company wont boast about, will it?

**dj_stick** · Jan 11, 2005, 11:04 AM

direct spdif or direct 24/96 recording is possible, using the p16v chip it bypasses the 10k2 DSP

ursamtl · Jan 12, 2005, 08:20 PM

I'm more interested in the 24-bit side of things than the 96. The difference between 16- and 24-bit resolution has a bigger impact on sound quality than 96kHz versus 48kHz.

Dec 7, 2004, 01:29 PM	#1
synthsmith DriverHeaven Newbie Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1 Rep Power: 0	Audigy 2 24-bit/96kHz ASIO 2.0 Recording support According to Creative's website,on Feb 2004, only SBAudigy2Plat.Pro had --> *ASIO 2.0 Low Latency Multi-Track [color=red]Recording [/color]Support (24-bit/96kHz)* See here But now, after Audigy4's release, the website's comparision chart shows all the members of the Audigy2 family can do 24bit/96kHz ASIO 2.0 Recording. See here Please see the pics here , where I have marked Old comparison http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...comparison.jpg New comparison http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...comparison.jpg Because you guys are extreme driver developers , I believe you will have the perfect answer

Dec 7, 2004, 01:50 PM	#2
Samir kX Lover Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 520 Rep Power: 0	Seems that they were working long & hard on 24/96 ASIO support for Audigy2 ZS / Audigy 2 value.... For how long, year & half? __________________ MU3NKA 3A HAPO6!

Jan 11, 2005, 11:01 AM	#3
Mr_sampler DriverHeaven Newbie Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 0	RESAMPLING What the comparison charts don't tell is RESAMPLING!. My most educated guess tells me that ONLY the zs platinum pro avoids it at 96khz: At this frequncy, all the others will resample "internally" to 48khz ..and that the company wont boast about, will it?

Jan 12, 2005, 08:20 PM	#5
ursamtl Montrealer Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 126 Rep Power: 0	I'm more interested in the 24-bit side of things than the 96. The difference between 16- and 24-bit resolution has a bigger impact on sound quality than 96kHz versus 48kHz.