|
|||||||
| Benching Discuss & compare your system and video card performance with others. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 69 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
that is pretty good and much better results Judas, no one is gonna beat that one for a while.
when i have some time to play with that again, i will see what i can do anyway. you have plenty of free disk space? i would have a larger partition size for Vista, like 80-100GB partition and leave the paging file as an auto manage size for all drives. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
Yeah i've auto managed page file.
but i set the main C partition to 50gb ..... i install all my games to a completely seperate partition... which is 500gb, the next is video (HD-DVDs and such) which is 1000gb and then another which is 1000gb and one last one which is just about 300gb... i've got WAY to much freaking space right now lol.... i really which they made high performance hardrives that were say 100gb each......i'm more then happy with running 600gb total....
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 69 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i think you will and should see the CPU % gets lower once the processor has been overclocked, your memory subsystem is a more optimized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
little bit of a better result...
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 1,052
Rep Power: 40 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() 3 x sas drives 15k.5
__________________
زعيم
MAIN PC(1)(2)(3):•Q9550•GAP35DS3P• 4GBCrucialPC2-8500BallistixTracerLED•XFX9800GTX•3x146GB CheetahSAS15K.5 Raid0•2x 1TB Raid1•LianLiA10B•2x22"5ms@3360x1050• BEDROOM HTPC(1)(2)(3):E6600•MSI945GM3-F•2048DDR2667•1TB•Samsung26"HDTV•HybridHDTV•5.1• Laptop:•Centrino2 P8400 1066fsb•4GB-DDR2 800•320GBSATA•DVDDL•15.4"WXGA•802.11a/b/g/n• WHServer:•AM2 5200+•2GB DDR2 800•Lots of TB Storage•1GB TCP/IP• |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
nice..
but that's just a smidge slower then my results of running 3 seagate 7200.11's in raid 0 on the intel ich9r chipset. with only a 0.9ms random access time variation. Could you run the FULL test instead o the quick, Considering that if i were to run the quick test, my scores would be over 1000mb/s average lol
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
250GB slice of 6 x 7200.11's
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Panging and Judas on vacation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 69 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
it's a pretty high read speed. i don't have 6 empty and fast drives right now, i give up. it has to be Judas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Can you put the "burst" speed in layman's terms for me Panging? I have read a bit about it but am not really sure I understand what it means...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
burst speeds are essentially this:
The cache present on the hardrives provides a fast access, if enough information is loaded to burst, it will. Burst speeds are usually what's measured for the maximum amount of data that can be transferred back and forth initially. But it's pretty limiting, you can hit insane burst speeds of 1000-2000-5000+ MB/S ... but they don't ammount to much considering they are just a small burst of a small amount of information, imo it's pretty insignificant. Theres more concern for random access and overall read/write speeds then burst.....
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Thanks for that Judas. Thought we lost you, serious about the West Nile? Sure hope not!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
not sure....
i was gradually getting worse from about end of june/start of july.... then come the 9th i was seriously losing my ability to do anything, muscles just happened to fall apart, headaches, etc and so forth to the point i couldn't even stand up, and only yesterday have i gradually started to feel better, i had to close shop up for those days though, i probably shouldn't even be a work today... but the more i think about it, the more it sounds like west nile.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
ahhhhhrrrggghhhhh! how do I delete this post? am I just blind or something? i went into edit but I can't find delete anywhere. I'm new to this forum, sorry.
Last edited by xerkon; Jul 20, 2008 at 12:45 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi, everyone. I have what I think is a weird HD Tach result and I was wondering if anyone could help me understand it
![]() Two 150 GB Raptors in Raid 0 on an nforce4 raid controller, XP SP2. I don't understand why it's basically flat with weird spikes. It almost looks as if the read is being limited by something, but then why does it go up occasionally? Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne, AU
Posts: 1,052
Rep Power: 40 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I woulda expected a lil faster than that with 2x 150 raptors
__________________
زعيم
MAIN PC(1)(2)(3):•Q9550•GAP35DS3P• 4GBCrucialPC2-8500BallistixTracerLED•XFX9800GTX•3x146GB CheetahSAS15K.5 Raid0•2x 1TB Raid1•LianLiA10B•2x22"5ms@3360x1050• BEDROOM HTPC(1)(2)(3):E6600•MSI945GM3-F•2048DDR2667•1TB•Samsung26"HDTV•HybridHDTV•5.1• Laptop:•Centrino2 P8400 1066fsb•4GB-DDR2 800•320GBSATA•DVDDL•15.4"WXGA•802.11a/b/g/n• WHServer:•AM2 5200+•2GB DDR2 800•Lots of TB Storage•1GB TCP/IP• |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland,New Zealand
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Carrying on from this post i wrote 2 years ago
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/benching...tml#post970836 I've got a new rig MBM is a P5Q with the "R" south bridge . I now have 6 disk in raid 5 the strip size is set to 64kb im disappointed with the pc mark 05 score Suite: HDD Test Suite Test set: HDD - XP Startup HDD - XP Startup: 11.726002MB/s Test set: HDD - Application Loading HDD - Application Loading: 5.225879MB/s Test set: HDD - General Usage HDD - General Usage: 5.529953MB/s Test set: HDD - Virus Scan HDD - Virus Scan: 61.261604MB/s Test set: HDD - File Write HDD - File Write: 8.997587MB/s Total score 3399 the inbuilt vista test thing only rated my HD performance 0.2 hire than the PC i have with only one 40g gb disk . However the HD tach score is much improved
|
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland,New Zealand
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
nice results ultra....
what hardrives you using again? btw xerkon. your nforce 4 raid results are fairly accurate.. your sevearly limited by your motherboard chipset itself.. in some cases i ended up with complete corruption using the nforce raid controller..... be cautious about it though.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Here's mine for my single WD drive. I have it in four partitions, a 390G partition for Vista, a 97 gig partition for Ubuntu, a 4Gig partition that Ubuntu made also, and a 105 gig partition that contains the image of the Vista partition.
![]() Shot at 2008-08-02
__________________
It's not so much getting your way that matters or not - what matters is how you go about getting it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,251
Rep Power: 99 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() My 3 WD6400AAKS' in RAID5 on a Dell Perc 5/i (flashed to LSI 8480E) w/ 256mb cache. Not the best, but good enough for an HTPC.
__________________
27" iMac: i5 750 * 80GB X25-M G1 * 4GB DDR3 * HD4850 Stacker: 2600k * P8P67 Pro * 4GB DDR3 * 80GB ioXtreme * 30GB X25-E * (2) HD6950 * Asus D2 * Enermax Revo85+ HWD: (2) Xeon E5649 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * 8800GTS * 1000W Antec FT01BW: (2) Xeon E5645 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * GTS210 * Gigabyte 800W Odin GT Storage: (2) Sans Digital TR8M-B * 29TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Here's my Intel ICH9R setup, 6 7200.9's (4x300gb, 2x250gb) in Raid5.
__________________
~~~~~ Caveman Make Fire!!! ~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
...just bummin 'round
|
INTEL ICH9R
2 x Seagate 7200.10 320GB w/ 160GB and 480GB partitions made in the Intel Matrix storage bios (seen as 2 drives in windows) 160 GB ![]() and HD Tune for good measure ![]() 480 GB partition ![]() and HD Tune again
Last edited by [hobo]eclipse; Sep 18, 2008 at 06:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 13
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
gotta love the 7200.11! edit
7200.10's are nice too
__________________
~~~~~ Caveman Make Fire!!! ~~~~~ Last edited by caveman-jim; Sep 18, 2008 at 05:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
...just bummin 'round
|
lol, was just think'n another 7200.11 would be nice
![]() ![]() post edited above:
Last edited by [hobo]eclipse; Sep 18, 2008 at 06:55 AM. Reason: mislabeling |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,251
Rep Power: 99 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Post your HDTach 3 Results!
Only 2 drives so far, and on ICH10R. Have yet to test the Perc 5/i or the ARC-1220.
![]() ![]() and an ATTO bench to show the write speeds
__________________
27" iMac: i5 750 * 80GB X25-M G1 * 4GB DDR3 * HD4850 Stacker: 2600k * P8P67 Pro * 4GB DDR3 * 80GB ioXtreme * 30GB X25-E * (2) HD6950 * Asus D2 * Enermax Revo85+ HWD: (2) Xeon E5649 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * 8800GTS * 1000W Antec FT01BW: (2) Xeon E5645 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * GTS210 * Gigabyte 800W Odin GT Storage: (2) Sans Digital TR8M-B * 29TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,251
Rep Power: 99 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Post your HDTach 3 Results!
no one cares or reads, but i'll post anyways
![]() ![]()
__________________
27" iMac: i5 750 * 80GB X25-M G1 * 4GB DDR3 * HD4850 Stacker: 2600k * P8P67 Pro * 4GB DDR3 * 80GB ioXtreme * 30GB X25-E * (2) HD6950 * Asus D2 * Enermax Revo85+ HWD: (2) Xeon E5649 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * 8800GTS * 1000W Antec FT01BW: (2) Xeon E5645 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * GTS210 * Gigabyte 800W Odin GT Storage: (2) Sans Digital TR8M-B * 29TB |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
...just bummin 'round
|
Re: Post your HDTach 3 Results!
bs. that is wicked. nice how performance doubled when u added 2 more drives. i seen quite a performance jump with my 1st ever raid setup earlier this year. makes all single hdd just feel laggy.
how do these new flash drives do in the power department? do they consume alot more than an old skool mechanical/platter drive? |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,251
Rep Power: 99 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Post your HDTach 3 Results!
Quote:
__________________
27" iMac: i5 750 * 80GB X25-M G1 * 4GB DDR3 * HD4850 Stacker: 2600k * P8P67 Pro * 4GB DDR3 * 80GB ioXtreme * 30GB X25-E * (2) HD6950 * Asus D2 * Enermax Revo85+ HWD: (2) Xeon E5649 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * 8800GTS * 1000W Antec FT01BW: (2) Xeon E5645 * EVGA SR-2 * 6GB DDR3 * GTS210 * Gigabyte 800W Odin GT Storage: (2) Sans Digital TR8M-B * 29TB |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|