|
|||||||
| Benching Discuss & compare your system and video card performance with others. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Wolfish Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cave; Ozark Mountains
Posts: 2,110
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Official NVIDIA 3DMARK03 thread!
post your scores, and questions here!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
dl locations
hmm futuremarks site is slow as hell,
any alternative locations to dl from ? .... edit: ok just came to dl locations page there are enough
__________________
xp 1700 512 ddr msi gf4 4600 yeaahh baby 210 gb seagate hds (raid 1+0) winxp sp1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Freedom is a feature.
|
FileMirrors displayed nothing when I tried to search.
__________________
-- Vedran |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Number Nine
|
I am grabbing it from Major Geeks website @ 100k roughly
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: England
Posts: 27
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Well i get 11000 in 3dmark 2001 and i just ran 2003 and omfg i got like 1504
lol 5 fps for most of it ... can this be right ? all running at stocks and 3dmark defaults :X
__________________
[color=red] Windows 2000 sr3 Athlon XP 1900+ Epox 8k3a kt333 chipset [/color] [color=yellow]Via 4 in 1 4.45 [/color] [color=red]768mb of Crucial pc2700 cas 2.5 ram Soundblaster Audigy[/color][color=yellow] 5.12.1.253 drivers [/color] [color=red]Geforce 4 ti4400[/color] [color=yellow]Nvidia Detonator 41.80[/color] |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
well one site shows a 2600+ with radeon 9700 pro getting about 4500
so yea that right.... (what do you wanna bet it's been optimized for geforce FX!) my Msi ti 4200 128 mb .... sucked 3dmark 2003 - 1500 3dmark2001SE- 13000 Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Apr 15, 2003 at 11:26 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 395
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
must we remove 3dmark 2k1 se in order to run this?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 20
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
hm
downloaded it.. then tried to install it.. nothing happened .. not even installation started ?! what am i doing wrong ?! dx9 is installed ! grrrr
__________________
xp 1700 512 ddr msi gf4 4600 yeaahh baby 210 gb seagate hds (raid 1+0) winxp sp1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Old 2k1 score ~13500, new 03 score 1573
I think demo is not running correctly, screen stays blank most of the time at the 'lair scene' XP2400+ @2200 Gainward Ti-4200 @290/580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolfish Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cave; Ozark Mountains
Posts: 2,110
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Well I ran 3DMARK03 on the following rig:
AMD Athlon XP 1600+ AGOIA @ (10.5x166) VisionTek GeForce4 Ti 4200se 128MB 250/444 - SC - StockClocked 310/620 - OC - OverClocked Code:
41.09 Det. - SC - 1548 41.09 Det. - OC - 1722 42.86 Det. - SC - 1559 42.86 Det. - OC - 1757 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
EDIT: staff
be nice, or be gone.
__________________
----------- AMD XP2100+ ATI Radeon 9700PRO 512MB RAM 3dmark03 score: 4666 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Elite Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Confederacy
Posts: 841
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolfish Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cave; Ozark Mountains
Posts: 2,110
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Please post ATi benchies in the ATi benchmark forum areas. Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Number Nine
|
I am humbled :(
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
ATI has like did in their previous drivers, optimized them for 3dmark and to recognize and run differently when it is running in order to get their cards higher scores. Not to mention new Cat 3.1 hit the day before 3dmark2003 coincidence I think not…
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolfish Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cave; Ozark Mountains
Posts: 2,110
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Quote:
And the fact that the Radeon9700 is much more powerful than anything currently available from any other manufacturer has nothing to do with it ![]() come on now... The Radeon 9700 Pro IS the most powerful graphics card available. And you know it. So, cool down and use your head. nVidia lost because they have nothing in the shed that can take on the 9700 series cards. They didnt loose because of driver optimization on ATi Tech's part, they lost because the power play that nvidia tried to make failed. Oh... on a side note.... [sarcasm=100%]nvidia never optimized drivers for 3dmark[/sarcasm]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
VTX NuTz!!!
|
dood!!
I got 1200 and sucked all the way through...!! Why is my score so low guys?... Im not OC'ing now.... but should stock on my system get more? MadGoat.... (PS, and how do I get Or make a picture on my sig??) thanks!! Could someone PM me with the instructions... or the nOOb how to with the SIG pic?) thanks
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 6
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
my score .. 1089 ahhh...yeah.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
I'm hoping for a good score for my card. I'm trying to post a score now for 13708 (2dmarks2001se)........ now that's damn high for a Ti4200 64mb.... Hopefully my Ti4200 will be high in 3DMARK03.... but eh. I'm depressed now.
__________________
[color=orange]ASUS P4P800 Deluxe [color=black]-[/color] 2.4C --> 3300mhz [color=black]-[/color] Mushkin PC3200 at 220 5-2-2-2 (cpu limited) [color=black]-[/color] BBAti 9800Pro at 430/375 [/color] [color=black]3[/color][color=gray]D[/color]M[color=black]a[/color][color=gray]r[/color]k[color=yellow]01[/color] [color=black]3[/color][color=gray]D[/color]M[color=black]a[/color][color=gray]r[/color]k[color=yellow]03[/color] 1600*1200 1280*1024 |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Driverage Snipe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada or NYC, USA
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
With no oc'ing, 1600, so I guess 1800-1900 with good oc's
__________________
![]() Antec SX1030 Case - Enermax 431 W Whisper PS - 4 Case Fans -ThermalRight AX-7 With Panaflo Ultra Fan - Sb Audigy / Logitech Z-560 Speakers / Sennheiser HD497 Headphones WD 80GB 7200 rpm HD - Samsung SyncMaster 955DF - LG 16x10x40x Burner / Pionner 16x Slot DVD View my rig http://nl.dodhq.net/Rig/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gurnee Illinois
Posts: 4,677
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
for me?
__________________
[color=orange]ASUS P4P800 Deluxe [color=black]-[/color] 2.4C --> 3300mhz [color=black]-[/color] Mushkin PC3200 at 220 5-2-2-2 (cpu limited) [color=black]-[/color] BBAti 9800Pro at 430/375 [/color] [color=black]3[/color][color=gray]D[/color]M[color=black]a[/color][color=gray]r[/color]k[color=yellow]01[/color] [color=black]3[/color][color=gray]D[/color]M[color=black]a[/color][color=gray]r[/color]k[color=yellow]03[/color] 1600*1200 1280*1024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolfish Bastard
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Cave; Ozark Mountains
Posts: 2,110
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Top score for my 4200se - 1861 points!
I am happy now...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Unbiased.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,812
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
OH YA! Bow down to my glorious fekking 184 points! YES! I AM ÜBER1337 NOW!
I rather liked the graphics, but I thought the collisions looks pretty phony - planes are made of metal, and metal bends... though in that slide show I may have just missed it
__________________
[img][/img] [color=White]Peace be with you, Joe.[/color] Driverheaven Staff Member (Supermoderator) |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Unbiased.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,812
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
[img][/img] [color=White]Peace be with you, Joe.[/color] Driverheaven Staff Member (Supermoderator) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Some Proof
Catalyst 3.1 Release Notes
3Dmark2003 GT4 runs a little slower than expected on certain chipsets where AGP writes are disabled. A future CATALYST™ will resolve this and provide a higher benchmark score 3DMark2003 has some minor corruption on the RADEON™ 9500 and RADEON™ 9700 series cards when running in Anti-Aliasing modes. This however does not impact scores http://pdownload.mii.instacontent.ne...ase_Notes.html Nice ati says don't worry if the video is corrupted as long as is dosent affect you score! Not to mention 3dmark uses ati's pixel shader version 1.4 for all the pixel shaders in the scenes. Current DirectX games, such as Tiger Woods and Unreal Tournament 2003, all use ps1.1 and ps1.3 pixel shaders. Few, if any, are using ps1.4." 3dmark2003 needs a built for ATI logo! |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
HardwareHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 68
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
1106...
I should spare some money to be able to buy a new graphics card...
__________________
My computer's too old |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
ATI driver guru
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ATI, Canada
Posts: 678
Rep Power: 63 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Some Proof
Quote:
I wrote the release note to let people know that we notice some pixelation in one of the tests, also I can tell you that the next CATALYST posting will fix that and will not impact scores. The whole scene is being rendered and there is no compromise. As for few games using ps1.4 or their equivelants let me tell you that UT2003 and Neverwinter Nights are two games that are using it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Number Nine
|
Why is everyone crying about their scores in comparison to the 9700. I am a Nvidia user but our GeForce 4 based cards can't touch the ATi 9700 line. One of my best friends has the Sapphire AIW 9700 and he scored 4433 on his first run through and 4420 with Cat 3.1 drivers. My Ti4200 scored 1796 but I know his card blows mine away
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 395
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I got 8700+ with 3DMark2001 SE, and 1400+ with 3DMark2003.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Re: Re: Some Proof
Quote:
1.4 UT2003 ? really .... where did you read this? please a link.... most news sites...nvida basts amd artical state---- Unreal Tournament 2003, use ps1.1 and ps1.3 pixel shaders I been following this on madonions forums comon show some proof! I really wanna see!!! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|