|
|||||||
| Benching Discuss & compare your system and video card performance with others. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#61 |
|
Guest
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
On my old rig I was running this was my score at stock speeds.
![]() Once I have mastered overclocking my new rig I will post the updated benchie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,754
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 | ||
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
I just ran this after several weeks having my Q9550 installed. Running with the CCC 10.3 Preview drivers at the moment.
ORB - Compare P9344 for those who care not to click the link.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Dyre Straits; Mar 17, 2010 at 11:31 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
After installing the 10.3a Preview drivers and setting all 3D settings to Performance.....
ORB - Compare P10701 |
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
I am sitting at P20100 with my rig at everyday settings with Physx off and a single GTX295.
My best score with a GTX295 and LN2 no PhysX: ![]() With 2 9800GX2's and no PhysX on LN2:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,254
Rep Power: 101 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Can't get any higher than 4.8GHz w/ LN2?
Last edited by Lowfat; Mar 20, 2010 at 06:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Was a while back, my one and only ever go at LN2. Cold bugged at -100, had to keep it below -95 during runs or it would start to drop points in benchies. It is no ringer chip but it performs well on air and is the only i7 processor I ever owned. Decided against any further chasing of rainbows but had these runs saved so threw them in for human interests sake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,254
Rep Power: 101 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#69 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
I have it at 4.07GHz using a Copper TRUE, hits 75 Celsius with the case fans at half speed while running LinX. I can run it higher for gaming but have no need. I was able to bench this chip at 4.5GHz on air.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 |
|
Filled with noobsauce
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: between the buns
Posts: 1,450
Rep Power: 59 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Isn't that rather hot for a TRUE copper?
Is the base flat enough? |
|
|
|
|
|
#71 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 |
|
Filled with noobsauce
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: between the buns
Posts: 1,450
Rep Power: 59 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Swapped to Lynnfield about 3 months ago, but I have always used Linx full ram x50 pass+ for stability tests. Meh, I just don't recall temps that high. Maybe your ambient temperature is rather high too.
What's the vcore at for 4ghz? Edit: It did get up to 77 max at times, but it was running 4.4ghz with not as good a cooler. Or am I expecting too much from the copper true? Last edited by iPlayer; Mar 20, 2010 at 10:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Well I have 4 TRUE's and the Copper beats my others by about 2 degrees is all. All but one are lapped. 77 degrees at 4.4GHz running LinX sounds enviable, I am at 1.247 Vcore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
|
Filled with noobsauce
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: between the buns
Posts: 1,450
Rep Power: 59 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Are you running HT ON?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Yes, 8 threads. The temp of 77 degrees is the hottest core using RealTemp. The EVGA X58 Classified's LCD readout only shows it getting to 64 degrees but that would be the IHS thermal sensor measurement I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
Filled with noobsauce
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: between the buns
Posts: 1,450
Rep Power: 59 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Ah, that's probably why. I didn't use HT. It would actually get me lower scores in some tests and increase temperature quite a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Suddenly, I can't get 3D Mark Vantage to start. Just as soon as I try, I get a "3D Mark Vantage has stopped working...." error.
I've tried turning off Aero.... Uninstalled it, rebooted, ran Registry Cleaner, Reinstalled it... Ran the latest Update for it.... Still no dice. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 | |
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
I was getting this the other day, but it wasn't at the start it was at the last combined test and it was Windows that was doing it. At the same time the 3DMark error was popping up windows was popping a message telling me to change graphics settings. (I know.... Not the same thing you are seeing)
I did also note at this time that I could get 3DMark to shut down with an error by mouse movement or clicking on the second screen, which stayed visable.... a monitoring program could do it also..... Do you have GPUZ running in the background?
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Quote:
The only real suspect at this point is my CPU OC. But, if it fails on an OC, what's the point, huh? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 | |
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
Mine's overclocked, but via multiplier, not raised bus speeds etc. But yeah, "what's the point"
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Relapsed Gamer
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
3DMARK VANTAGE Performance results
P28554 3DMarks Result Doesn't seem that high to me but my 5970 isn't even running 5870 clocks so I guess that's ok.
__________________
E Penis Specs:
<------------- See System Specs |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
No rhyme or reason for it, but, without any warning it started working again. I'll have to try to figure out just what was preventing it from starting.
At any rate, I have a new score to report: Result P18519 |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
All wheel driver!
|
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
3DMARK Vantage: 9079 3DMarks
seems a bit rubbish now I've looked at some of your scores. Is this good for my system specs tho?
__________________
Processor: 7.5 Memory: 7.7 Graphics: 7.2 Gaming Graphics: 7.2 Primary Hard Disk: 5.9 [3DMARK Vantage: 9229] [3DMARK 06: 18365] [3DMARK 03: 46941] [3DMARK 2001 SE: 36059] [3DMARK 2000: 29438] ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
HardwareHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Re: Futuremark 3DMark/PCMark Vantage Thread
My laptop score in 3D Mark Vantage :
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|