DH SuperPI Results

Bolletje · Mar 25, 2009, 08:12 PM

...

Bolletje · Mar 25, 2009, 10:16 PM

So, yet another new topic.

I hope some results will be posted...

Mac Daddy · Mar 25, 2009, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bolletje

So, yet another new topic.

I hope some results will be posted...

On this thread and the other Bro this weekend on both my systems ... you have no idea how busy I have been lol. Great ideas on both threads

CDsDontBurn · Mar 26, 2009, 02:44 AM

lol, i wouldn't do it in my super old school computer, lol.

Bolletje · Mar 26, 2009, 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac Daddy

On this thread and the other Bro this weekend on both my systems ... you have no idea how busy I have been lol. Great ideas on both threads

Hehe, I understand. I am also busy (school and I need to Vmod my graphics card :P)

ChaosMinionX · Mar 26, 2009, 11:49 PM

Stickied

Mac Daddy · Mar 27, 2009, 12:39 AM

Good call

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bolletje

Hehe, I understand. I am also busy (school and I need to Vmod my graphics card :P)

Might be able to help you with that sent Gen the Accelero Pro he is working on hard and soft modding that card. Will get some results myself soon

ChaosMinionX · Mar 27, 2009, 06:34 AM

Used my 24/7 clocks for this one, if competition arises I will see what shes got

Username: ChaosMinionX
SuperPI score: 11.669
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
CPU speeds: 2.83GHz @ 4.03GHz
RAM: 4 * 2GB Corsair Dominator 8500C5D
RAM speeds: "570MHz DDR2 1141" @ “5-5-5-15”
Motherboard: ASUS Rampage Formula
Cooling: Liquid (CPU+Chipset Only)

Cheers

*Core i7 benches next

Zardon · Mar 27, 2009, 11:06 AM

not sure I rate this at all to be honest. never really have. its more a frequency test than a multiprocessing test which bears very little in relation to real world performance. only partially loads 2 cores of the 16 core EP system I have.

[hobo]eclipse · Mar 27, 2009, 11:09 AM

Username: [hobo]eclipse
SuperPI score: 12.010
CPU: Xeon 3110 C0
CPU speeds: 3.0GHz @ 4.003GHz
RAM: 2 x 2GB G.Skill 8500
RAM speeds: 565MHz DDR2 1130 @ 5-5-5-15
Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45-UD3R
Cooling: Noctua NH-U12P 1300 RPM

24/7 clocks
default win7_7057 x64 install

play if you like chaos, for now i'm chillen, not gunna pull out anymore hairs trying to adjust the plethora of voltages on this thing, least not till next week

Xeon 3360 on its way, god i hope its an E0, then i'll atleast get the same clocks again, maybe more fsb, but i dunno bout this ram.

Bolletje · Mar 27, 2009, 02:42 PM

Scores added.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac Daddy

Good call

Might be able to help you with that sent Gen the Accelero Pro he is working on hard and soft modding that card. Will get some results myself soon

9500GT it is for me. I need to get a new soldering iron too.
OCP is @ 1,35V apparently and coldbug @ ~-50, although I didn't tested it (yet).

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zardon

not sure I rate this at all to be honest. never really have. its more a frequency test than a multiprocessing test which bears very little in relation to real world performance. only loads 2 cores of the 16 core EP system I have.

It's also about efficiency (= score * frequency). The lower the better. And you are correct about that it doesn't use a lot of cores. Therefore a lot of Duo cores (E8600) are used for this type of benchmark. However the new i7's also got a good effiency. They are often used for long term SPI (4M, 8M). With lower frequency they get a lower time (= better score) in comparison to the E8600 for example.

And by the way, not everyone has two QX9775's :P

Zardon · Mar 27, 2009, 02:55 PM

Well its actually not really about efficiency either, thats a part of the point im making. I used to hang around a lot on xtremesystems.org and i know its a hugely popular application over there. I personally feel it shows very little of use to anyone in real world terms. A person on a slightly lower clocked quad for example will score less than someone on a highly clocked dual. Reality quite often is the reverse. Which is the point im making.

I have never been a fan of synthetic benching because it really is quite meaningless. and this application imo is one of the worst.

I dont think anyone in their right mind would assume that a dual core Intel chip at 4ghz is better than say a 16 "core" EP at 2.8-3ghz. Thats basically what that app will show however (I see 41% CPU use on ONE core on a system which I can't really discuss under intel NDA atm).

But ill quit posting in here, its great you are making the effort and I appauld it. hope you guys have fun with it

Bolletje · Mar 27, 2009, 03:47 PM

I completely understand, but which benchmark is then a good representative? 3Dmark06 is very dependent on CPU score (Quad core wins almost all the time), but in 2006 there weren't many games (you could count them on one hand) that used a Quad core. Even now few games support it. And then you have 3mark Vantage, that when you enable PhysX on your NV card your score gets a great boost. However, how many games support PhysX? Also a few.
And there are definitely also

Now a days those benchmarks are just about getting high scores. For some people it's even a hobby. Making cash is also one of the reasons behind the whole thing.

Even games aren't such a great comparison tool, because each game reacts different on every system. One game uses the CPU more and the other the graphics card. Because not all games use the full potential of a quad core, a duo core often delivers higher FPS. Simply because those two cores are higher clocked. So it's just which game or benchmark you run. They all react differently.

I just wanted to get a topic started so the whole benchmarking scheme here on DH would maybe be improved. And because these benchmarks react quite well on overclocks people will want to get that little bit of score more to end up higher in the score list.

Just Learnin' · Mar 27, 2009, 05:08 PM

Username: Just Learnin'
SuperPI score: 8.782
CPU: QX9650
CPU speeds: 3.0GHz @ 5271MHz
RAM: PC2 8500 BallistiX
RAM speeds: 1100MHz @ 5-5-5-15
Mainboard:Gigabyte GA-P35-DQ6
Cooling: Dry ice

Anyone really serious about running SuperPi uses Task Manager to choose the best single core of any CPU to run it even if they have a multi-core CPU.

An old score of mine,

ChaosMinionX · Mar 27, 2009, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Learnin'

Anyone really serious about running SuperPi uses Task Manager to choose the best single core of any CPU to run it even if they have a multi-core CPU.

An old score of mine,

5271 under what cooling? And what made you drop the QX for a normal 9650 like in your system specs?

@hobo - You would beat me probably in FSB, I can only get about 500 on this X48... P45 will probably clock a bit better.

EDIT: Moved this to the newly relocated benching subforum

Just Learnin' · Mar 27, 2009, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosMinionX

5271 under what cooling? And what made you drop the QX for a normal 9650 like in your system specs?

Under dry ice, I no longer have the Extreme, it now resides in Australia, well as of last November it did anyways. My son now has the GA-P35-DQ6 mobo in his rig. One of the best mobos I have ever owned.

ChaosMinionX · Mar 27, 2009, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Learnin'

Under dry ice, I no longer have the Extreme, it now resides in Australia, well as of last November it did anyways. My son now has the GA-P35-DQ6 mobo in his rig. One of the best mobos I have ever owned.

Ahh dry ice.... what mix and pot did you use?

Just Learnin' · Mar 27, 2009, 05:57 PM

Acetone, used an F1 by KingPin with lots of tissue paper, overflowed quite a bit as it is an LN2 pot and is quite small for dry ice.

ChaosMinionX · Mar 27, 2009, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Learnin'

Acetone, used an F1 by KingPin with lots of tissue paper, overflowed quite a bit as it is an LN2 pot and is quite small for dry ice.

Good stuff, those are sick pots

Lowfat · Mar 27, 2009, 11:32 PM

Username: lowfat
SuperPI score: 10.865
CPU: i7 920
CPU speeds: 2.66GHz @ 3.8GHz
RAM: 6GB Corsair PC3-1333, 6GB Aenon PC3-1600
RAM speeds: 1200MHz @ 9-9-9-24
Mainboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4
Cooling: Cooler Master V10 w/ TEC on 24/7.

Bolletje · Mar 27, 2009, 11:48 PM

Nice score...

I don't see the V10 come along often, :P

Well people, scores are added like daily

Mac Daddy · Apr 5, 2009, 10:20 PM

OK I ran all 3 tests with the same setup as the other thread not gonna set any records but hey why not

(I just included the scores separately to save repeating info)

Username: Mac Daddy
SuperPI score(s):
1M: 27.768s
8M: 5m 02.297s
32M: 24m 19.270s
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
CPU speeds: “2700” @ “3231”
RAM: 2 * 2GB OCZ ReaperX PC8500
RAM speeds: "949" @ “5-5-5-18”
Motherboard: MSI K9N SLI (version 2)
Cooling: Air - CM Hyper212 (2x120mm fans)

Bolletje · Apr 5, 2009, 10:42 PM

/added

Nice to see some results.

Apparently there is a huge difference between C2D and a AMD X2. Nevertheless, nice job

Mac Daddy · Apr 5, 2009, 10:44 PM

There is for sure and should have results up for my main machine for ya next week some time its an E6550 machine

Mac Daddy · Apr 26, 2009, 08:42 PM

Same setup as the other thread and just ran the 1M test for a stock E6550 reference.

Username: Mac Daddy
SuperPI score: 22.043
CPU: Intel C2D E6550
CPU speeds: 2.33GHz @ 2.33GHz
RAM: 2 * 2G OCZ ReaperX PC8500
RAM speeds: 1066MHz @ 5-7-7-20
Motherboard: GA-X38-DQ6
Cooling CPU: Cooler Master Hyper212 (1 fan)

Bolletje · Apr 26, 2009, 08:58 PM

Also added...

Too bad this topic doesn't runs very well. Abroad it's far more popular :s

Thanks for your input Mac Daddy

ViRuS2k · Jun 4, 2009, 11:37 AM

My superPi on my new system.

Just Learnin' · Jun 5, 2009, 08:12 AM

Username: Just Learnin'
SuperPI score: 8.782s
CPU: i7 920 D0
CPU speeds: 2.67Ghz @ 4.608
RAM: 3 x 2GB G.Skill PC12800 1600 F3-12800CL8T-6GBHK
RAM speeds: 1316MHz @ 7-7-7-20
Mainboard: EVGA X58 Classified
Cooling: Air-TRUE Copper

My new system

Bolletje · Jun 5, 2009, 01:10 PM

Added them both.

ViRuS2k, can you fill this form in?:
Username:
SuperPI score:
CPU:
CPU speeds: “original” @ “overclocked”
RAM:
RAM speeds: "speed" @ “timings”
Mainboard:
Cooling:

And could you also make a screen where I/we could actually see the run (loops and the Finish screen)?

I now put a question mark with your score. If you post a screen like I said it will be added

Stop It · Jun 6, 2009, 01:52 PM

Username:Stop It
SuperPI score:14.516s
CPU:Intel Q9400
CPU speeds: 2.66Ghz @ 3.6Ghz
RAM: Kingston HyperX PC6400
RAM speeds: 900Mhz @ 5-5-5-15
Mainboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3P
Cooling: An Old Gigabyte Orb Cooler, still good thanks to its large fan and lots of copper.

Piccie:

Mar 25, 2009, 08:12 PM	#1
Bolletje HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,224 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	DH SuperPI Results ... Last edited by Bolletje; Mar 11, 2010 at 06:17 PM.

Mar 25, 2009, 10:16 PM	Thread Starter #2
Bolletje HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,224 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results So, yet another new topic. I hope some results will be posted...

Mar 26, 2009, 02:44 AM	#4
CDsDontBurn Lurking DriverHeaven Join Date: May 2003 Location: Southern California Posts: 22,779 Rep Power: 235 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results lol, i wouldn't do it in my super old school computer, lol. __________________ Her First Day \| A year later

Mar 26, 2009, 11:49 PM	#6
ChaosMinionX USB 3 dot oh Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 1,911 Rep Power: 47 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Stickied __________________ ::Heatware:: How you can help DriverHeaven by using Digg!

Mar 27, 2009, 06:34 AM	#8
ChaosMinionX USB 3 dot oh Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Boston, MA Posts: 1,911 Rep Power: 47 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Used my 24/7 clocks for this one, if competition arises I will see what shes got Username: ChaosMinionX SuperPI score: 11.669 CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 CPU speeds: 2.83GHz @ 4.03GHz RAM: 4 * 2GB Corsair Dominator 8500C5D RAM speeds: "570MHz DDR2 1141" @ “5-5-5-15” Motherboard: ASUS Rampage Formula Cooling: Liquid (CPU+Chipset Only) Cheers Core i7 benches next __________________ ::Heatware:: How you can help DriverHeaven by using Digg!*

Mar 27, 2009, 11:06 AM	#9
Zardon DriverHeaven Founder Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 32,480 Rep Power: 179	Re: DH SuperPI Results not sure I rate this at all to be honest. never really have. its more a frequency test than a multiprocessing test which bears very little in relation to real world performance. only partially loads 2 cores of the 16 core EP system I have.

Mar 27, 2009, 11:09 AM	#10
[hobo]eclipse ...just bummin 'round Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 2,907 Rep Power: 112 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Username: [hobo]eclipse SuperPI score: 12.010 CPU: Xeon 3110 C0 CPU speeds: 3.0GHz @ 4.003GHz RAM: 2 x 2GB G.Skill 8500 RAM speeds: 565MHz DDR2 1130 @ 5-5-5-15 Motherboard: Gigabyte EP45-UD3R Cooling: Noctua NH-U12P 1300 RPM 24/7 clocks default win7_7057 x64 install play if you like chaos, for now i'm chillen, not gunna pull out anymore hairs trying to adjust the plethora of voltages on this thing, least not till next week Xeon 3360 on its way, god i hope its an E0, then i'll atleast get the same clocks again, maybe more fsb, but i dunno bout this ram. Attached Thumbnails

Mar 27, 2009, 02:55 PM	#12
Zardon DriverHeaven Founder Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 32,480 Rep Power: 179	Re: DH SuperPI Results Well its actually not really about efficiency either, thats a part of the point im making. I used to hang around a lot on xtremesystems.org and i know its a hugely popular application over there. I personally feel it shows very little of use to anyone in real world terms. A person on a slightly lower clocked quad for example will score less than someone on a highly clocked dual. Reality quite often is the reverse. Which is the point im making. I have never been a fan of synthetic benching because it really is quite meaningless. and this application imo is one of the worst. I dont think anyone in their right mind would assume that a dual core Intel chip at 4ghz is better than say a 16 "core" EP at 2.8-3ghz. Thats basically what that app will show however (I see 41% CPU use on ONE core on a system which I can't really discuss under intel NDA atm). But ill quit posting in here, its great you are making the effort and I appauld it. hope you guys have fun with it

Mar 27, 2009, 03:47 PM	Thread Starter #13
Bolletje HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,224 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results I completely understand, but which benchmark is then a good representative? 3Dmark06 is very dependent on CPU score (Quad core wins almost all the time), but in 2006 there weren't many games (you could count them on one hand) that used a Quad core. Even now few games support it. And then you have 3mark Vantage, that when you enable PhysX on your NV card your score gets a great boost. However, how many games support PhysX? Also a few. And there are definitely also Now a days those benchmarks are just about getting high scores. For some people it's even a hobby. Making cash is also one of the reasons behind the whole thing. Even games aren't such a great comparison tool, because each game reacts different on every system. One game uses the CPU more and the other the graphics card. Because not all games use the full potential of a quad core, a duo core often delivers higher FPS. Simply because those two cores are higher clocked. So it's just which game or benchmark you run. They all react differently. I just wanted to get a topic started so the whole benchmarking scheme here on DH would maybe be improved. And because these benchmarks react quite well on overclocks people will want to get that little bit of score more to end up higher in the score list.

Mar 27, 2009, 05:08 PM	#14
Just Learnin' HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Posts: 1,414 Rep Power: 56 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Username: Just Learnin' SuperPI score: 8.782 CPU: QX9650 CPU speeds: 3.0GHz @ 5271MHz RAM: PC2 8500 BallistiX RAM speeds: 1100MHz @ 5-5-5-15 Mainboard:Gigabyte GA-P35-DQ6 Cooling: Dry ice Anyone really serious about running SuperPi uses Task Manager to choose the best single core of any CPU to run it even if they have a multi-core CPU. An old score of mine, Attached Thumbnails Last edited by Just Learnin'; Mar 27, 2009 at 05:53 PM.

Mar 27, 2009, 05:57 PM	#18
Just Learnin' HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Posts: 1,414 Rep Power: 56 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Acetone, used an F1 by KingPin with lots of tissue paper, overflowed quite a bit as it is an LN2 pot and is quite small for dry ice.

Mar 27, 2009, 11:32 PM	#20
Lowfat Xtreme Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can Posts: 4,254 Rep Power: 101	Re: DH SuperPI Results Username: lowfat SuperPI score: 10.865 CPU: i7 920 CPU speeds: 2.66GHz @ 3.8GHz RAM: 6GB Corsair PC3-1333, 6GB Aenon PC3-1600 RAM speeds: 1200MHz @ 9-9-9-24 Mainboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-DS4 Cooling: Cooler Master V10 w/ TEC on 24/7. __________________

Mar 27, 2009, 11:48 PM	Thread Starter #21
Bolletje HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,224 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Nice score... I don't see the V10 come along often, :P Well people, scores are added like daily

Apr 5, 2009, 10:20 PM	#22
Mac Daddy DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 7,950 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results OK I ran all 3 tests with the same setup as the other thread not gonna set any records but hey why not (I just included the scores separately to save repeating info) Username: Mac Daddy SuperPI score(s): 1M: 27.768s 8M: 5m 02.297s 32M: 24m 19.270s CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ CPU speeds: “2700” @ “3231” RAM: 2 * 2GB OCZ ReaperX PC8500 RAM speeds: "949" @ “5-5-5-18” Motherboard: MSI K9N SLI (version 2) Cooling: Air - CM Hyper212 (2x120mm fans) Attached Thumbnails __________________ "My mom said the only reason men are alive is for lawn care and vehicle maintenance." - Tim Allen

Apr 5, 2009, 10:42 PM	Thread Starter #23
Bolletje HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,224 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results /added Nice to see some results. Apparently there is a huge difference between C2D and a AMD X2. Nevertheless, nice job

Apr 5, 2009, 10:44 PM	#24
Mac Daddy DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 7,950 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results There is for sure and should have results up for my main machine for ya next week some time its an E6550 machine __________________ "My mom said the only reason men are alive is for lawn care and vehicle maintenance." - Tim Allen

Apr 26, 2009, 08:42 PM	#25
Mac Daddy DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Ontario, Canada Posts: 7,950 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Same setup as the other thread and just ran the 1M test for a stock E6550 reference. Username: Mac Daddy SuperPI score: 22.043 CPU: Intel C2D E6550 CPU speeds: 2.33GHz @ 2.33GHz RAM: 2 * 2G OCZ ReaperX PC8500 RAM speeds: 1066MHz @ 5-7-7-20 Motherboard: GA-X38-DQ6 Cooling CPU: Cooler Master Hyper212 (1 fan) Attached Thumbnails __________________ "My mom said the only reason men are alive is for lawn care and vehicle maintenance." - Tim Allen

Apr 26, 2009, 08:58 PM	Thread Starter #26
Bolletje HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,224 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Also added... Too bad this topic doesn't runs very well. Abroad it's far more popular :s Thanks for your input Mac Daddy

Jun 4, 2009, 11:37 AM	#27
ViRuS2k HardwareHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Uk Posts: 8,334 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results My superPi on my new system.

Jun 5, 2009, 08:12 AM	#28
Just Learnin' HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Posts: 1,414 Rep Power: 56 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Username: Just Learnin' SuperPI score: 8.782s CPU: i7 920 D0 CPU speeds: 2.67Ghz @ 4.608 RAM: 3 x 2GB G.Skill PC12800 1600 F3-12800CL8T-6GBHK RAM speeds: 1316MHz @ 7-7-7-20 Mainboard: EVGA X58 Classified Cooling: Air-TRUE Copper My new system

Jun 5, 2009, 01:10 PM	Thread Starter #29
Bolletje HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: The Netherlands Posts: 1,224 Rep Power: 79 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Added them both. ViRuS2k, can you fill this form in?: Username: SuperPI score: CPU: CPU speeds: “original” @ “overclocked” RAM: RAM speeds: "speed" @ “timings” Mainboard: Cooling: And could you also make a screen where I/we could actually see the run (loops and the Finish screen)? I now put a question mark with your score. If you post a screen like I said it will be added

Jun 6, 2009, 01:52 PM	#30
Stop It HHs' Resident Kitty Lover Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Biggleswade, UK Posts: 1,431 Rep Power: 78 System Specs	Re: DH SuperPI Results Username:Stop It SuperPI score:14.516s CPU:Intel Q9400 CPU speeds: 2.66Ghz @ 3.6Ghz RAM: Kingston HyperX PC6400 RAM speeds: 900Mhz @ 5-5-5-15 Mainboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3P Cooling: An Old Gigabyte Orb Cooler, still good thanks to its large fan and lots of copper. Piccie: __________________ Sig Courtesy of Mousey