Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results

**MIG-31** · Dec 12, 2010, 02:38 PM

3DMark 11 Basic Edition – the gamer’s benchmark for DirectX 11
3DMark 11 is the latest version of the world’s most popular benchmark for measuring the graphics performance of gaming PCs. Designed for testing DirectX 11 hardware running on Windows 7 and Windows Vista the benchmark includes six all new benchmark tests. The Basic Edition is free to use and allows an unlimited number of benchmark runs without registration or expiry. Visit 3Dmark to upgrade your Basic Edition to the Advanced Edition and unlock all presets, custom settings, benchmark looping, unlimited online results storage, offline results management and more.

Download: Here

Thanks to TechPowerUp for the Information.

Alternative Download Link: Majorgeeks

**MIG-31** · Dec 12, 2010, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dyre Straits

Finally got a score and link to share:

P3740 running the Performance Test pre-sets.

Result

Quote:

Originally Posted by Liqourice

Got it going now after a reboot.

First result P4311 3DMarks

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIG-31

I dont realy go for Benchies but Here Is Mine

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dyre Straits

Using the newly-available modded 10.11 drivers, I get P3799.

Result

I'm sure if I decided to OC my video card I could get it over 4000 easy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert McClelland

Result my system

Copied all the current scores to this thread

Takaharu · Dec 12, 2010, 05:50 PM

P3562. I'm kind of surprised, comparing it to the other results...

Jac · Dec 12, 2010, 06:00 PM

I got P2698

Result

CJLMTLCA · Dec 12, 2010, 06:15 PM

Jac · Dec 12, 2010, 06:25 PM

Holy Fek - What are you feeding that thing! Link to the results, I'd like to peruse the details.

Robert McClelland · Dec 12, 2010, 07:38 PM

You wonder how I got Professional edition you may ask I'm part staff at other site

. That how I got that type of edition

.

blibbax · Dec 12, 2010, 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jac

Holy Fek - What are you feeding that thing! Link to the results, I'd like to peruse the details.

Crossfire and EE 6 core - what did you expect? :P

Takaharu · Dec 12, 2010, 11:39 PM

Ignore this post - found out myself.

Robert McClelland · Dec 12, 2010, 11:42 PM

It has Image Quality tool to it Who know I don't know the drifter anyway lol

press · Dec 13, 2010, 02:40 AM

Cool on stock CPU & GPU settings...

CJLMTLCA · Dec 13, 2010, 05:05 AM

Here you go Jac. I didn't note the first run links and while experimenting with something in the BIOS I did a second run with better scores. Don't know if it helped or if it's in the margin of error.

Performance

Extreme

blibbax · Dec 13, 2010, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takaharu

P3562. I'm kind of surprised, comparing it to the other results...

I hear SLI Drivers aren't quite there for it yet, which would explain your lower score.

iPlayer · Dec 13, 2010, 01:25 PM

Yeah, looks like SLI isn't working properly there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert McClelland

You wonder how I got Professional edition you may ask I'm part staff at other site

. That how I got that type of edition

.

The pro edition costs $995. Wow! Do review sites also have to purchase it at that price, or do you sometimes get them for free?

Quote:

Originally Posted by CJLMTLCA

Here you go Jac. I didn't note the first run links and while experimenting with something in the BIOS I did a second run with better scores. Don't know if it helped or if it's in the margin of error.

Or maybe you had other stuff loaded in the background?
You are running everything @stock?

CJLMTLCA · Dec 20, 2010, 03:32 AM

Stock? No. Only CPU is overclocked. Nothing much running on the top level.

**MIG-31** · Dec 20, 2010, 06:31 PM

Updated: |MG| 3DMark 11 Build 1.0.1 Download / |MG| 3DMark 11 Update 1.01 Download

CJLMTLCA · Jan 3, 2011, 08:20 PM

1.01 + Catalyst 10.12 + CAP 10.12

My personal best so far

**temeteus82** · Jan 3, 2011, 09:11 PM

P3284 3DMarks for me ...
compare link : Result

Optix · Jan 3, 2011, 11:15 PM

Here's mine.

Result

I upgraded to the 10.10 driver (looks like I have further catching up to do) but haven't had a chance to re-run the test.

I'm really surprised with SLI performance though.

Tyrsonswood · Jan 4, 2011, 12:26 AM

P4348

Compare

Takaharu · Jan 6, 2011, 07:52 PM

New score
Note the similar systems - lowest is around 5200. Should I be worried?

blibbax · Jan 6, 2011, 09:19 PM

Yeah - you sure it's making use of your SLI? That seems low compared to others in this thread, too.

Takaharu · Jan 6, 2011, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blibbax

Yeah - you sure it's making use of your SLI? That seems low compared to others in this thread, too.

Not a clue - it shows up as SLI but that's just the system info, I wouldn't know if the benchmarks are utilising SLI.

blibbax · Jan 6, 2011, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Takaharu

Not a clue - it shows up as SLI but that's just the system info, I wouldn't know if the benchmarks are utilising SLI.

Perhaps use GPU-Z to monitor load on the second GPU while benching?

iPlayer · Jan 7, 2011, 12:00 AM

Ya, those are without SLI. I think the SLI profiles for 3dmarks 11 are back in the latest releases of the drivers.

Takaharu · Jan 8, 2011, 12:43 AM

P4961

I checked the profile and it's pre-set to Nvidia recommended (SLI). I also set multi-display to single display performance mode. Any ideas?

blibbax · Jan 8, 2011, 12:55 AM

Have you tried any other benchmarks, to see if you're performing as would be expected for an SLI system in those?

Takaharu · Jan 8, 2011, 01:22 AM

Furmark Multi-GPU: 4689, standard: 4424. Seems like SLI works there.

blibbax · Jan 8, 2011, 01:23 AM

Why such a small difference between multi GPU and standard? Am I missing something?

Takaharu · Jan 8, 2011, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blibbax

Why such a small difference between multi GPU and standard? Am I missing something?

There was a difference, which is what I was looking for; I've never compared the performance of two 570s to a single one before. Am I to assume that the difference should be greater?

Also, would it be possible for a mod to stick these questions in its own thread? It's going a long way off-topic...

Dec 12, 2010, 02:38 PM	#1
MIG-31 HardwareHeaven News Mod Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Nottingham,UK Posts: 56,817 Rep Power: 471 System Specs	Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results 3DMark 11 Basic Edition – the gamer’s benchmark for DirectX 11 3DMark 11 is the latest version of the world’s most popular benchmark for measuring the graphics performance of gaming PCs. Designed for testing DirectX 11 hardware running on Windows 7 and Windows Vista the benchmark includes six all new benchmark tests. The Basic Edition is free to use and allows an unlimited number of benchmark runs without registration or expiry. Visit 3Dmark to upgrade your Basic Edition to the Advanced Edition and unlock all presets, custom settings, benchmark looping, unlimited online results storage, offline results management and more. Download: Here Thanks to TechPowerUp for the Information. Alternative Download Link: Majorgeeks __________________ Please Post Your News Submissions Here

Dec 12, 2010, 05:50 PM	#3
Takaharu I can fart in 7 languages Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: England, UK Posts: 1,843 Rep Power: 110 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results P3562. I'm kind of surprised, comparing it to the other results... __________________ I don't get paid to know the answer, therefore I'm far more likely to give you a straight and honest answer. Mods Rig, Box Mods Rig, Folding details

Dec 12, 2010, 06:00 PM	#4
Jac HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: England Posts: 760 Rep Power: 51 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results I got P2698 Result

Dec 12, 2010, 06:15 PM	#5
CJLMTLCA 14X Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 633 Rep Power: 63 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results __________________

Dec 12, 2010, 06:25 PM	#6
Jac HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: England Posts: 760 Rep Power: 51 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Holy Fek - What are you feeding that thing! Link to the results, I'd like to peruse the details.

Dec 12, 2010, 07:38 PM	#7
Robert McClelland PAX Tweaker, PAX Expert. Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Somewhere in Wood County Ohio Same Town :) Posts: 10,636 Rep Power: 196 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results You wonder how I got Professional edition you may ask I'm part staff at other site . That how I got that type of edition . __________________ "XTREME AUDIO IS CRAP!" "There no support for it. It's crapist card on face of the earth it should be throw into the sun" http://www.speedtest.net/result/1949536385.png

Dec 12, 2010, 11:39 PM	#9
Takaharu I can fart in 7 languages Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: England, UK Posts: 1,843 Rep Power: 110 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Ignore this post - found out myself. __________________ I don't get paid to know the answer, therefore I'm far more likely to give you a straight and honest answer. Mods Rig, Box Mods Rig, Folding details

Dec 12, 2010, 11:42 PM	#10
Robert McClelland PAX Tweaker, PAX Expert. Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Somewhere in Wood County Ohio Same Town :) Posts: 10,636 Rep Power: 196 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results It has Image Quality tool to it Who know I don't know the drifter anyway lol __________________ "XTREME AUDIO IS CRAP!" "There no support for it. It's crapist card on face of the earth it should be throw into the sun" http://www.speedtest.net/result/1949536385.png

Dec 13, 2010, 02:40 AM	#11
press HardwareHeaven Lover Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 163 Rep Power: 38 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Cool on stock CPU & GPU settings... Attached Thumbnails

Dec 13, 2010, 05:05 AM	#12
CJLMTLCA 14X Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 633 Rep Power: 63 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Here you go Jac. I didn't note the first run links and while experimenting with something in the BIOS I did a second run with better scores. Don't know if it helped or if it's in the margin of error. Performance Extreme __________________

Dec 20, 2010, 03:32 AM	#15
CJLMTLCA 14X Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 633 Rep Power: 63 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Stock? No. Only CPU is overclocked. Nothing much running on the top level. __________________

Dec 20, 2010, 06:31 PM	Thread Starter #16
MIG-31 HardwareHeaven News Mod Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Nottingham,UK Posts: 56,817 Rep Power: 471 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Updated: \|MG\| 3DMark 11 Build 1.0.1 Download / \|MG\| 3DMark 11 Update 1.01 Download __________________ Please Post Your News Submissions Here

Jan 3, 2011, 08:20 PM	#17
CJLMTLCA 14X Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Montreal, Canada Posts: 633 Rep Power: 63 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results 1.01 + Catalyst 10.12 + CAP 10.12 My personal best so far __________________

Jan 6, 2011, 07:52 PM	#21
Takaharu I can fart in 7 languages Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: England, UK Posts: 1,843 Rep Power: 110 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results New score Note the similar systems - lowest is around 5200. Should I be worried? __________________ I don't get paid to know the answer, therefore I'm far more likely to give you a straight and honest answer. Mods Rig, Box Mods Rig, Folding details

Jan 6, 2011, 09:19 PM	#22
blibbax What does this do? Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Oxford, UK Posts: 4,215 Rep Power: 251 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Yeah - you sure it's making use of your SLI? That seems low compared to others in this thread, too. __________________ Donate the spare computing power of your PC to help to cure Alzheimer's, ALS, Huntington's, Parkinson's disease and cancer: Fold for HH!

Jan 7, 2011, 12:00 AM	#25
iPlayer Filled with noobsauce Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: between the buns Posts: 1,450 Rep Power: 59	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Ya, those are without SLI. I think the SLI profiles for 3dmarks 11 are back in the latest releases of the drivers.

Jan 8, 2011, 12:43 AM	#26
Takaharu I can fart in 7 languages Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: England, UK Posts: 1,843 Rep Power: 110 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results P4961 I checked the profile and it's pre-set to Nvidia recommended (SLI). I also set multi-display to single display performance mode. Any ideas? __________________ I don't get paid to know the answer, therefore I'm far more likely to give you a straight and honest answer. Mods Rig, Box Mods Rig, Folding details

Jan 8, 2011, 12:55 AM	#27
blibbax What does this do? Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Oxford, UK Posts: 4,215 Rep Power: 251 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Have you tried any other benchmarks, to see if you're performing as would be expected for an SLI system in those? __________________ Donate the spare computing power of your PC to help to cure Alzheimer's, ALS, Huntington's, Parkinson's disease and cancer: Fold for HH!

Jan 8, 2011, 01:22 AM	#28
Takaharu I can fart in 7 languages Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: England, UK Posts: 1,843 Rep Power: 110 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Furmark Multi-GPU: 4689, standard: 4424. Seems like SLI works there. __________________ I don't get paid to know the answer, therefore I'm far more likely to give you a straight and honest answer. Mods Rig, Box Mods Rig, Folding details

Jan 8, 2011, 01:23 AM	#29
blibbax What does this do? Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Oxford, UK Posts: 4,215 Rep Power: 251 System Specs	Re: Futuremark 3DMark 11 Results Why such a small difference between multi GPU and standard? Am I missing something? __________________ Donate the spare computing power of your PC to help to cure Alzheimer's, ALS, Huntington's, Parkinson's disease and cancer: Fold for HH!