|
|||||||
| Benching Discuss & compare your system and video card performance with others. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
Sep 13, 2005, 03:34 AM
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 0  |
benchmark results
my system:
pentium 4 3,0 ghz Asrock p4vt8+ 800 FBS Western digital 160 GB 133ATA Western digital 80 GB 133ATA Corsair 2x 512 DDRam pc3200 2,0cl Corsair 1x256 DDRam pc3200 2,0cl Audigy 2 6600 GT Leadtek 480W Powersupply Aquamark 03 Results: (1024x768x32, very high detail, only 4xAntis., all off) 38.192 Points (demo test) 3DMark05: (1024x768x32, all off, very high detail) 2798 (whole test result) done with 77.77 driver whql bios ram settings: 2.0 T are the results any good and what can i do to get better results ? |
|
|
|
Sep 13, 2005, 04:49 AM
|
#2 |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,254
Rep Power: 101  |
you gor 38,182 in aquamark ?? thats really low.... should be around 50K..
and the 3dmark05 is not bad but a tad on the low side. Should be above 3K. Make sure all your drivers are updated, make sure your chipset drivers are installed. Turn off all programs that aren't in use.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 13, 2005, 09:31 AM
|
Thread Starter
#3
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 0 |
changed driver and did just another test and got for aquamark:
47.368 i have latest official via hyperiondriver installed, i dont know if my motherboard is that good, just wonder what i need to get better results. should i post my dxdiag ? i just remember i installed pax audigy 4 driver before this test and had XI-FI with some kind of bug could be the reason too for 10k more points now. anyway when i look around in different benchmark forums i feel a bit underpowered when i compare my results  
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14, 2005, 02:21 AM
|
#4 |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,254
Rep Power: 101 |
Are you running with no other applications open and are you overclocked at all? If no overclocking 47K isn't that bad.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 14, 2005, 11:05 PM
|
Thread Starter
#5
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 0 |
yes all without overclocking and i shut down every program i dont use in the background with the programm enditall...
so would a new motherboard give me improvement or what are the suggestions here if i would upgrade my system, new harddisk 10.000 rpm or anything else ? |
|
|
|
|
Sep 15, 2005, 04:55 AM
|
#6 |
|
Xtreme
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Grande Prairie, AB, Can
Posts: 4,254
Rep Power: 101 |
probably not a whole lot.. What is your 3dmark05 score now?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 16, 2005, 10:35 AM
|
#7 |
|
Reap What You Sow.
|
motherboard actually does have a bit to do with overclockability. but ur best bet is to just get the best overclock u can @ stable conditions. the only benchmark that new Hard drive would matter is pcmark, but only if u buy the PRO version. i think ur 6600 is holding back scores a lil.
__________________
insert witty comment here! |
|
|
|
|
Sep 16, 2005, 04:10 PM
|
#8 |
|
Uber Coffee Drinker
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gatineau, Quebec
Posts: 2,250
Rep Power: 0 |
A new board would most likely allow more features such as AGP/PCI voltages, RAM timings and voltage, etc etc. I don't think one chipset overclocks more than another however but I could be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 18, 2005, 02:07 AM
|
Thread Starter
#9
|
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 0 |
ok i tested with 3DMark05
3059 overall i can say that i dont have much more fps in certain games in comparison to my gf4 4200 ti but fps are bit more stable...and thats ok but when i look around for benchmark results with similar systems by reults are quiet low in comparison to others |
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
