Crucial m4 256GB SSD (C400) Review

7. HD Video Read / Write Speeds9. Install Times


Crucial m4 C400 SSD (256GB) Review

File Copy Tests



Benchmark Results


In the first of our "true" real world tests we have created four file copy scenarios which cover operations which users are likely to perform on a regular basis. We copy files of 18GB, 7GB and 1.1GB from location to location within the drive, recording the time taken to complete the task. In the final test we copy a folder containing 2,323 image/video files of varying size totalling 3.34GB.

Remember back on the Crystaldiskmark page when we talked about drives being tuned for OS use or transfers. Well this test gives us an idea of what Intel can gain at the expense of random file read/writes. For large transfers their drive is fastest, even beating the Vertex 3 with the gap closing as the file size falls. When we reach a single 1GB file or a batch of smaller files the m4 ties with the Intel in performance, another good result for Crucial as this type of operation is a lot more common in day to day use.

Leave a Reply

Related posts

Crucial BX100 SSD Review

Crucial BX100 SSD Review

Crucial BX100 SSD Review

Lexar Workflow Review (HR1, DD512, CFR1 and SR1) Updated with HR2, UR1 and SR2

Lexar Workflow Review (HR1, DD512, CFR1 and SR1) Updated with HR2, UR1 and SR2

Looking for a smart way to work with solid state storage, from drives to cards?

Samsung T1 Review (Tiny 1TB Portable SSD)

Samsung T1 Review (Tiny 1TB Portable SSD)

Samsung T1 Review (Tiny 1TB Portable SSD)