|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Do Kx drivers overcome this limitation?
It's explained in this link:
How much is 24bit/96khz on all Audigy a fake? - Hydrogenaudio Forums Basically, whenever you apply effects via the DSP to audio of ANY bitrate (i.e. 24bit/96Khz) it converts it to 16-bit, 48Khz. This happens on ALL Audigy-Audigy 4 series cards, i believe. Is this a limit of ONLY Audigy-based cards or is it of the EMU10K2 DSP itself? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Tail Razer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 4,027
Rep Power: 50 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
So yes, I can feed 24/96 into the DSP - for certain - the effects are 48Khz as the DSP is locked at the sample frequency. edit: but keep in mind - the original 24/96 is mixed at the outputs... so, I am thinking the only SRC is what is affected in DSP... tho I am not certain. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Montevideo, MN USA
Posts: 973
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
If you are talking about converting the final wav file(s) to 24/96, R8Brain by Voxengo, (freeware), will convert to whatever you need.
Voxengo |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Tail Razer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 4,027
Rep Power: 50 ![]() ![]() |
Im not sure what the point would be... up converting to 24/96 wont add any detail lost when recording at 16/48... ??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Alternative Audioproductions
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Germany / Sachsen-Anhalt
Posts: 1,710
Rep Power: 56 ![]() ![]() |
Upconverting is nonsense, thatīs true!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
I'm curious, according to that link i posted, Audigy 2 cards and above playback ANY audio from 2 speakers at 24bit/192Khz, right? Does that mean it has to resample audio at another quality (e.g. 16/44, 24/96, etc.)? Or does it ONLY resample when you apply effects to the audio via the DSP? It also says there that "resampling still introduces noise." How noisy is it? Can it actually damage/distort the audio? Last edited by seskanda; Feb 21, 2008 at 11:38 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,507
Rep Power: 61 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I am not an expert, but:
Quote:
Quote:
I think that depends on the re-sampling algorithm used and who you ask, but generally re-sampling involves inserting zeros between samples, skipping samples, or a combination of both, so obviously you are going to lose some quality in the process (i.e. either you are throwing away information, or you are guessing at what the missing information might be). You can get good results, but you are not going to gain quality. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Tail Razer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bernyurass, AZ - USA
Posts: 4,027
Rep Power: 50 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
UNLESS - I rout Wave HQ playback into the DSP with the P16V plugin - but the DSP effects are still only 48 Khz - and mixed AFTER the DSP with dry/un-affected Wave HQ - so, the dry is same (22-192Khz), but DSP effects are 48Khz. Or so thats my understanding - I never bother with WaveHQ - its not fully implemented in kX and kinda useless imho. Last edited by Maddogg6; Feb 22, 2008 at 03:28 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,507
Rep Power: 61 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Both (assuming that you are going from one sample rate to another in both cases).
Quote:
Again, not an expert, but I think the re-sampling is done in the hardware of the card, so it would be the same for both. Last edited by Russ; Feb 22, 2008 at 04:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 39
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,507
Rep Power: 61 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I do not know much about the X-FI, but I think it has native support for multiple sample rates, and has better re-sampling capabilities (any info I could give would be just info found on the internet, that you could find yourself). |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Using CL drivers, the only way to bypass the DSP is when using Creative's DVD Audio Player. Unter all other circumstances the card will resample at 48kHz.
As for the X-Fi, the DSP still works at 48 kHz, but it does resampling through its SSRC. This delivers upto 130+dB of SNR vs. the 80 of the previous architectures. In fact, the majority of the chips processing power is used for this conversion. The X-Fi also allows another mode, where the DSP may be used on non 48-kHz content, by splitting the incoming signal. I guess that this means it may do upto 192kHz, since it has 4 effect slots, but then you only get 1 effect. You may also completely disable the DSP and allow for the sound to pass without any conversion. (Music Creation mode??) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|