routing VS xrouting ?

Eminos · Jun 16, 2003, 03:01 PM

What is the difference between "routing" and "xrouting" in DSP?

I use the regular "routing" without "Surrounder" (oldstyle), but I see that the default in newer versions isn't like that...

/Eminos

ThJ · Jun 16, 2003, 04:53 PM

For you who have little DSP space: Remove all plugins you don't use. If you don't record from external sources, remove the Prolog. Removing the router and constructing your own minimalistic wiring works too. If you use Cakewalk/Cubase and no SoundFonts, you can remove everything and connect FXbus0, 1 to Epilog out0, 1. If you need to mix in an effects chain, add a Stereo Mix (remember to Tweak and drag the sliders to 100%) and route your sequencer's aux to the right FXbus pair. =)

**Eugene Gavrilov** · Jun 16, 2003, 06:50 PM

xrounting + surrounder is a more powerful combination
however, surrounder won't allow you to use EQ10 (if you have 10k1-based board), but you'll have Timbre instead

/E

Eminos · Jun 16, 2003, 09:37 PM

Ok, thanks...but what are the benefits when using xrouting and surrounder with 10k1 ?

**Eugene Gavrilov** · Jun 20, 2003, 02:21 AM

surrounder: different speaker configurations, Dolby Surround encoder / decoder
routing: better rec / synth routings

in general, if you don't need extra resources for additional effects, I suggest you use xrouting+surrounder+timbre

/E

Jun 16, 2003, 03:01 PM	#1
Eminos DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 133 Rep Power: 0	routing VS xrouting ? What is the difference between "routing" and "xrouting" in DSP? I use the regular "routing" without "Surrounder" (oldstyle), but I see that the default in newer versions isn't like that... /Eminos

Jun 16, 2003, 04:53 PM	#2
ThJ DriverHeaven Newbie Join Date: Jun 2003 Posts: 9 Rep Power: 0	For you who have little DSP space: Remove all plugins you don't use. If you don't record from external sources, remove the Prolog. Removing the router and constructing your own minimalistic wiring works too. If you use Cakewalk/Cubase and no SoundFonts, you can remove everything and connect FXbus0, 1 to Epilog out0, 1. If you need to mix in an effects chain, add a Stereo Mix (remember to Tweak and drag the sliders to 100%) and route your sequencer's aux to the right FXbus pair. =)

Jun 16, 2003, 06:50 PM	#3
Eugene Gavrilov kX Project Lead Programmer and Coordinator Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,119 Rep Power: 75	xrounting + surrounder is a more powerful combination however, surrounder won't allow you to use EQ10 (if you have 10k1-based board), but you'll have Timbre instead /E

Jun 16, 2003, 09:37 PM	Thread Starter #4
Eminos DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Sweden Posts: 133 Rep Power: 0	Ok, thanks...but what are the benefits when using xrouting and surrounder with 10k1 ?

Jun 20, 2003, 02:21 AM	#5
Eugene Gavrilov kX Project Lead Programmer and Coordinator Join Date: Dec 2002 Posts: 3,119 Rep Power: 75	surrounder: different speaker configurations, Dolby Surround encoder / decoder routing: better rec / synth routings in general, if you don't need extra resources for additional effects, I suggest you use xrouting+surrounder+timbre /E