|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
kX's future looking grim? To Eugene
Hi,
Although I'm not a big fan of the company, I've been using Creative soundcards for over ten years now, using a SB16 to use in Fasttracker under DOS, eventually replacing it by a SB Live!, then an Audigy, then an Audigy 2 Platinum Pro ZS. I started using kX just before I bought the Audigy, which was more or less 4 years ago, and never looked back. 4 years later, I can't say I noticed dramatic progression - I understand it's free, entirely voluntarily, and we have no right to press the developer. But please consider the following - within a year, it will be very tough to find cards to buy which kX supports - the Audigy 2 still isn't supported 100%, and sales-wise it's an old and obsolete card now. Because of this, it's unlikely kX's user base will grow, and Creative releases new sound cards faster than kX has intermediate releases. I understand the Audigy 4 or the X-Fi use different chips, so they'll never work with kX. I move my rig and audio gear to friends sometimes to jam together, and there's slight damage on the breakout box (the Firewire port doesn't work anymore), but I can't replace it with anything I can buy that works with kX. I can program, and I'm VERY motivated to help developing kX. I'm not interested in working on the sound driver cores, I'm not smart enough for that, and Creative made you promise not to share the code anyone. That's fine - everything besides the sound core would benefit from an overhaul too. Please Eugene, I'd hate to see your wonderful software fall behind and become obsolete. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 452
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Man, even if I get a better card I'm going to keep the audigy 2 with kx drivers in my system...
For example, it's great for mixing soundsources onstage, having different outputs combinations of the same sources, I can do everything I want... Plus, all the faders can be midi controlled... It's perfect. Can it get any better? ![]() (edit: well, actually there's only the 44khz asio implementation, but really, anyway, it's already good enough for me like this) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
S-3D enthusiast
|
You can still find SB16 sound cards in stores. I don't see SBlive! and Audigy cards disappearing very soon. If you can still find very old cards, you can probably find more recent ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Alternative Audioproductions
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Germany / Sachsen-Anhalt
Posts: 1,710
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Montevideo, MN USA
Posts: 973
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Well if the developer allows me to, the first things I would start working on would be;
- Remove the built-in mixer from the kX package, but provide it in plugin-form; (The mixer is handy for newbies, but useless for experienced people; for those using alternatives for the epilog, most (all?) controls are removed anyway) - Provide an option to disable the system tray icon (I hate system trays myself), and implement command line options to open any window or plugin directly through the command line; (kx.exe -dsp to toggle the dsp window, kx.exe -asio to toggle the asio settings window, etc) - Help finalize the SDK to motivate plugin developers (and make all the old ones work again, for good!); - (Don't know if this is feasible yet), if ITRAM is full, have additional plugins load in RAM; - Repackage the installer. Make kX install to a single directory of your choice, instead of putting a copy there (why?) as well as windows\system32 - Rework the default look, and solidify the skin system; - Plenty more ideas that would make kX more of a slick, streamlined package |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Long Time ***** Friend
|
Very interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
DH Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,932
Rep Power: 64 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
It is possible all along to write a total new user interface for kX. The ikx interface, which hardly ever changes relevantly, provides practicly all functionality to do so. (Review kxi.h) The level of functionality, number of features, third party compatibility etc. etc. is (as always) only a matter of how much effort one is willing to put in to it. /LeMury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Lover
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Posts: 174
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
if you are clever enough probably you will never return to creative drivers even if you are gamer like me. i am not going to get X-Fi just because i am in love with the flexebility of this driver. it has "endless" potential. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I have an audigy4 pro and am listening through kx drivers and i definately hear better sound quality or do i just think im hearing better sound quality
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I think it could perhaps be a good idea to get some new people involved in the future development of the kX Driver. Do not get me wrong, Eugene and Co have made a fantastic work for many years. I have followed and used the kX driver since the first version was released as I followed closely the activities of the APS Live project and still use v. 3537. The v. 3538 has been very slow and we have not yet seen 3538j that would fix drums on midi channel 10 etc. I also very much miss the 24/96 ASIO recording, that I have waited for several years. I understand that Eugene has other important things to do in life besides the kX project, but since he is alone in coding and having the NDA's with Creative, it looks to me as he is the "bottleneck" in the development work.
I recently bought a 2nd hand E-mu APS card with the breakout box and must say that the APS mixer interface is so much better and so much easier to understand. If kX would do a similar interface for a new version, I think that would benefit many musicians, not only myself. There are so many talented people that contribute daily to the kX development, writing plug-ins etc. Could Eugene transfer some key NDA's (or could Creative be pursuaded to sign new ones for people like LeMury etc.) to carry the project further? Kind regards, Sture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 48
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
It's no use. I've sent Eugene a PM a week ago, and I haven't gotten any replies so far.
Afaik, the NDA's are only valid regarding the core driver code; I can't see how Creative could legally enforce prohibition for other people to work on the package that comes with it. Cards built for music production are becoming more affordable anyway, and kX a half finished mess of awesome features for rapidly dating hardware. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
DH Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,932
Rep Power: 64 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|