new pc ?

PangingJr · Oct 13, 2006, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by H3X4D3C1M4L

I did not come here with the specific intention of trying to corrupt your mind or make you think that your information was false. I should have made an effort perhaps to be a little clearer in my clearing up, agreed, but it was not in anyway an attempt at dissuasion.

it was about the non-VT things that i posted, you just came here to say that those pocessors (915, 925) do support the VT.
after that i have not yet seen any of your posts that saying the pocessors do not support the VT

you post on #26 that the "930 has VT and upwards"
is that includes the 945 too?

you didn't not try to clear anything, until i made you to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by H3X4D3C1M4L

To clarify, the chart I had did claim that ALL the 9xx series of Pentium D's had VT on them as long as they had an 800MHz FSB. That chart was released prior to the Pentium D's actual release, it was a projection. I was using that in my assumption that the 915 had VT.

so does the 925 you said. and you even have "an Intel chart right in front of you"
and that makes me wanted to see the "Intel chart" that one that you have in front of you before.

no, you did not come here with the specific intention of trying to corrupt my mind,.
you come here to show me once again of how you want to accomplish your proposed solution to become a spammer.

H3X4D3C1M4L · Oct 14, 2006, 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PangingJr

it was about the non-VT things that i posted, you just came here to say that those pocessors (915, 925) do support the VT.
after that i have not yet seen any of your posts that saying the pocessors do not support the VT

you post on #26 that the "930 has VT and upwards"
is that includes the 945 too?

you didn't not try to clear anything, until i made you to.

so does the 925 you said. and you even have "an Intel chart right in front of you"
and that makes me wanted to see the "Intel chart" that one that you have in front of you before.

no, you did not come here with the specific intention of trying to corrupt my mind,.
you come here to show me once again of how you want to accomplish your proposed solution to become a spammer.

I really hate to break it to you Panging, but when someone makes a mistake it isn't the end of the world.

Chaos · Oct 14, 2006, 04:24 PM

HEX4D3C1M4L and PanginJr please stop the arguments in this thread we have a Flame Zone if that's what you are looking for. If it continues I can just close the thread

PangingJr · Oct 14, 2006, 04:46 PM

as much as i want to stop posting in this... and about this, you don't seem to want to.

if you don't know before that the processors are not support the Intel VT and you asked me where do i get the info from, then it would be different.

since when you think you've made a mistake, like i said before, i haven't yet seen any of your post that is showing you were misunderstanding or anything like that before. making a mistake is quite different from spamming...

Chaos · Oct 14, 2006, 04:54 PM

thread closed sorry guys but you leave no choice

Oct 14, 2006, 04:24 PM	#33
Chaos Number Nine Join Date: May 2002 Location: Nova Scotia Posts: 5,268 Rep Power: 167 System Specs	HEX4D3C1M4L and PanginJr please stop the arguments in this thread we have a Flame Zone if that's what you are looking for. If it continues I can just close the thread __________________

Oct 14, 2006, 04:54 PM	#35
Chaos Number Nine Join Date: May 2002 Location: Nova Scotia Posts: 5,268 Rep Power: 167 System Specs	thread closed sorry guys but you leave no choice __________________

Oct 14, 2006, 04:46 PM	#34
PangingJr Member Join Date: Mar 2003 Posts: 5,989 Rep Power: 71	as much as i want to stop posting in this... and about this, you don't seem to want to. if you don't know before that the processors are not support the Intel VT and you asked me where do i get the info from, then it would be different. since when you think you've made a mistake, like i said before, i haven't yet seen any of your post that is showing you were misunderstanding or anything like that before. making a mistake is quite different from spamming...