|
|||||||
| Hardware Discussion & Support Discuss your computer - its components or ANY hardware, past/current/future you want, or ask our forum experts if you have a general problem with your hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Howlin at the moon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,663
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Raid help, pleeeease
Tonight im going to unleash the evil that is Vista 32 retail, I walked into the shop and picked up an OEM copy for £72.
Ok DH people I need a little advice with a Raid setup. Gotta clear something up first I have a AN9 32X board which supports Raid setups, do I setup my Raid using the bios or as part of the windows vista setup. Ok what im working with hardware wise: 2X160GB Samsung Spinpoint HD160JJ Sata2 NCQ 1X200GB Maxtor Diamondmax 10 PATA 1X200GB Maxtor Diamondmax 9 SATA1 Weird configuration but it's what I have to work with unfortunately. Now I have a few options but no idea how it's going to impact on stability and performance. Option 1 is Raid 0 for the Samsungs and use the rest for storage Option 2 is Raid 5 Run from the 2 samsungs and back up to the ? Which would be better? Option 3 Leave it to you DH guru's to put me on the straight and narrow with wise words of enlightenment. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
imo, best bet would be to raid the 2 samsungs in raid 0, and set the other drives as storage (aka, downloads/music/movies)
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howlin at the moon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,663
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yep im thinking that too but still open to suggestions.
Currently im thinking Raid 0 the two Samsungs, regular backups to the Maxtor9 and photo's, movies etc on the Maxtor10. Don't worry im still dualbooting XP off a seperate 40gb drive. Now a question, would I get better results putting media etc on the Sata max9 or the Pata max10??? Edit: one last thing does Norton ghost run with Vista?? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
Media.. hmm.... while pata has it's limitation that sata doesn't, i'm not sure how the different versions of the drives stack up (although i've had some pretty bad luck with older sata 1 maxtor drives recently)
Have you ran HDTach on either one of them? That should give you a little idea which is overall better (consider the CPU usage and sustained bandwidth on either)
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Howlin at the moon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,663
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Heh, dont get me started on Maxtor and it's damned drives, I had 3 fail on me last year. I'm hoping to invest in a couple of western digitals once my wedding and stuff is over with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,794
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() |
If you're investing in drives for RAID-0 or RAID-5, the Seagate 7200.10 320GB drives are an insanely good value these days, I can get one for CDN $105. I slapped 3 into an Asus P5B-e, I'm seeing 150MB/sec sustained transfer on a RAID-5 volume and 170 or so into the RAID-0 volume.
The RAID-5 is nice because its ultra reliable. If you're a lazy butt and don't backup all that often (I myself am guilty of that despite just getting a 750GB drive for that purpose) then its great. Plus it should keep Vista flowing nice and smooth
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|