|
|||||||
| Hardware Discussion & Support Discuss your computer - its components or ANY hardware, past/current/future you want, or ask our forum experts if you have a general problem with your hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
My friend went from a single 2.9 overclocked core to a dual 2.6 core CPU. Both have the same L1/L2 cache(s). All other hardware in the computer unchanged.
His Aquamark benchmark for the single 2.9 = 12800CPU/12800GFX with a total score of 83,500. His Aquamark benchmark for the dual 2.6 = 11600CPU/14800GFX with a total score of 85,500. 2 questions. Why did the GFX score go up with the dual 2.6 CPU? Why did the total score go up with the dual 2.6 CPU? Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
HH's Nokia shareholder!
|
I think its rather simple deal. Dual core cpu's can handle more calculations than single cpu. The gpu got more data faster than it would get it from single cpu. Thats why the results for gfx are higher.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
Interesting. I hadn't run Aquamark 3 in ages.
Under Vista 32-bit, I can run the tests but it refuses to exhibit a score at the end. I do have the .dll hotfix installed, too. So, is this being tested under XP or Vista? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
XP. The CPUs are FX-57 and FX-60 (socket 939).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|