|
|||||||
| Hardware Discussion & Support Discuss your computer - its components or ANY hardware, past/current/future you want, or ask our forum experts if you have a general problem with your hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Hi all, well browsing thru this forum looking at peoples pc specs has got me a little confused.
What is the amd barton chip? that has confused me for a few weeks now. I got a amd 2400+ but not barton, someone please tell me what a barton is, heh Osp ------ Amd 2400+, Asus As7333 mobo, 1024gb ram, 80gb Hdd, Nvidia Geforce 4 TI 4200, Sounblaster Audigy 2 w/6.1 channel surround sound, Sony DVD Rom, 40x12x48 Burner (forgot what brand), Logitech Wireless mouse and Keyboard. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Never forgotten
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rest In peace, Joe.
Posts: 2,198
Rep Power: 69 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Barton is the core type. The 2400+ that you have is a TB core, which has a 256k L2 cache onboard. The Barton core is basically based off of the TB core but updated with a 512k L2 Cache. In which helps it run faster since it is less dependant on the memory.
__________________
We are born naked, wet, and hungry. Then things get worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
I THINK... not completely sure, but doesn't the barton cores use .13u setups?
or did the TB use that as well?
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Judas; Aug 28, 2003 at 07:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Never forgotten
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Rest In peace, Joe.
Posts: 2,198
Rep Power: 69 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thoroughbred: the Thoroughbred "B" contains eight rather than seven layers, which had been the norm for the Thoroughbred "A". The Barton core also shares this newer layer difference. Also, there were differences in the speed of the FSB. The XP 1700+ to XP 2400+ ran at 133 MHz, while the XP 2600+ and XP 2800+ were capable of utilizing 166 MHz. As do all of the Barton core's. The L2 cache was doubled to 512 KB and its clock speed was reduced at the same time. Both are built on the same sized wafer, and have the same socket size. And most of the newer boards will handle both, though only the latest will handle the XP3200+ Barton with the 400 FSB.
I am tired so this may sound like crap
__________________
We are born naked, wet, and hungry. Then things get worse. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|