Sharkims

So anyone else see the latest snippit about the Teja? 64-bit extensions? Not a solid 64-bit processor. 32-bit with the ability to do 64-bit also.

.09microns.

Running at: 5-7ghz with 2mb+ L2 cache.

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11785

They call it "64-bit Windows Elements"

What I know is, 64-bit @ 7ghz w/ 2mb+ L2 cache, is going to be sweet.

__________________
System-1:
MSI K8N Neo Platinum || A64 3200+(200x11) - Zalman 7000A-AlCu || 1x1gb OCZ PC3200@400(3-3-3-7) || 9800XT || WD Raptors 2x36 RAID0
System-2:
MSI 875P Neo-FIS2R || P4 2.4c(FSB:200) - Intel Cooler || 2x256 GEIL PC3200@400(2-3-3-6) || AIW9000 || WD SE 120x2 RAID0
System-3:
DELL Inspiron 9100 || P4 3.0c(mobile) || 2x256mb PC3200(3-3-3-8) || Mobility Radeon 9700 - 128mb || WSXGA+ 15.4" || 60gb 5400RPM 8mb

giganick

how much do you think they will cost when they first come out??how long will it be before they are even affordable to the general public??..how long do you think it will take before they even write software that will use all of that proccesor power??

Sharkims

It's going to be using AMD64 technology and as of right now, lots of companies are already starting to make software 64-bit. It's kind of sad how Microsoft screwed Intel over, but it was whoever made the first move.

Not till late 2004 I think and a lot of money then.

__________________
System-1:
MSI K8N Neo Platinum || A64 3200+(200x11) - Zalman 7000A-AlCu || 1x1gb OCZ PC3200@400(3-3-3-7) || 9800XT || WD Raptors 2x36 RAID0
System-2:
MSI 875P Neo-FIS2R || P4 2.4c(FSB:200) - Intel Cooler || 2x256 GEIL PC3200@400(2-3-3-6) || AIW9000 || WD SE 120x2 RAID0
System-3:
DELL Inspiron 9100 || P4 3.0c(mobile) || 2x256mb PC3200(3-3-3-8) || Mobility Radeon 9700 - 128mb || WSXGA+ 15.4" || 60gb 5400RPM 8mb

giganick

cool...have fun with your new rig......if i had the money i would buy one too!!!(read your other thread)....

The_Neon_Cowboy

It didnt take intel long to do a 180 AT ther LIE factory

REMBER THEM STATEING THEY WILL NEVER RELESE A 64/32 BIT CPU AND THAT 64 BIT HAS NO ADVANTAGE IN THE HOME!!!!!!!! THAT USERS SHOULD USE 32 BIT AND THE 64 BIT ONLY HELPS IN BUSSINESS SITUATIONS....

intel really shovels it with both hands. It's now offical i will never "buy" an intel cpu or cpu based system or build them for that matter....

thier slogan should be ...

"We lie so you dont have to"

or

"what bs can we sell you on today so that we may chage our minds tommarow and totally renig on every single word we have said"

or

"amd is killing our cpus please help"

or

"here have a sack of ****"

or

"Brainwashing such a wonderfull thing"

__________________

giganick

...huh??..im lost??

The_Neon_Cowboy

intel explicitly stated "no 64/32bit cpu" and how its uterlly useless home wise... and how 64 belongs in the workplace.. and blah balh...

like they always do when amd blows them away
then they actually embrace the tech that they put down...

they did the same thing with duels..

Intel does more 180's than a skateborder when it comes to what they say...

__________________

The_Neon_Cowboy

64-bit desktop computing unnecessary, says Intel CTO

AMD and Apple are touting 64-bit computing on the desktop far too quickly, Intel CTO Pat Gelsinger said today.

Moving beyond 32-bit addressing is "really not needed for several more years", he told reporters attending the Intel Developer Forum in San Jose.

AMD, of course, isn't going to wait that long. Next week, the company will unveil its long-awaited 64-bit desktop processor, the Athlon 64. And, just a few weeks ago, Apple began shipping its Power Mac G5 desktop based on the 64-bit IBM PowerPC 970 processor.

But if Gelsinger's comments are anything to go by, Intel believes its rivals are coming to market too early.

"How many [users] have seen the crippling 4GB limit on their desktop PCs?" he asked. Today, he claimed, there aren't apps that need more than the 4GB offered by virtual memory schemes, let alone however much physical memory is available.

So when will 64-bit computing on the desktop become a necessity? "As a rule of thumb, address space [requirements] consume a bit every two years," he said. "We're at 1GB now and starting to see 2GB. So we're probably about three of four years away from really needing that 4GB on general desktops. That puts you out in the 2006/07 timeframe."

That's not to say Intel won't come to market with a desktop 64-bit processing sooner than that, either through licensed AMD64 technology or a variant of its own. But if it does, it clearly won't because the market needs that level of addressing.

Intel has long been rumoured to be working on an alternative to AMD64, codenamed 'Yamhill'. If Intel ever releases a processor based on Yamhill technology, it's unlikely to arrive before 2005, at least one analyst has claimed. Some observers have speculated that the next generation of Pentium processor, 'Prescott', already incorporates Yamhill, but has it physically turned off. If that's the case, it will almost certainly be in future Xeons too, ready to be switched on if Apple or AMD begin eating too far into Intel's market share.



http://www.hardwareheaven.com/showthre...ht=intel+64bit


and that just one artical /"press release" thare are many more...
they are compensateing for amd catching them with thier pants down......

ati is emabraceing AMD's 64/32 and have allready stated thier cards compatiable wit 64 bit drivers....

the game markers are two .. game like ut2004 will have a 64 bit flavor

intel states any 64bit for home computing is not needed til 2006/7
so them relesing a cpu that supports that before makes them flat out liers...

__________________

giganick

ok...makes sense now...i like neon will probably never own an intel proccessor except possibly a centrinio...??