|
|||||||
| Hardware Discussion & Support Discuss your computer - its components or ANY hardware, past/current/future you want, or ask our forum experts if you have a general problem with your hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SG
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
As above, I am currently using star downloader. It works better than getright in mozilla, and it's free without adware. It looks like a rip off DAP tho..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Indiana , USA
Posts: 2,677
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Im using Getright the only thang that i like is that i can minimize the d/l into the system try
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wave Existence
Posts: 2,065
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Download accelerator pro : spyware sucks. works pretty well though. i like alwaysresume.
Flashget : spyware sucks. period. Getright : its alright, but unstable and kinda bloated. spyware sucks once again. Net ants : never heard of it. Star Downloader : very very good, but somewhat unstable in some situations. I like it. Fresh Download : my favorite of the bunch and the one I'm currently using. Browser integration doesn't work all too well, but everything else works and I really really like it. GoZilla : bloated piece of spyware crap and still lacking in features. pure bull. Download Butler : never bothered with it. it didn't sound all that great. ReGet : never heard of it.
__________________
"A picture of my existence... would show a useless wooden stake covered in snow... stuck loosely at a slant in the ground in a ploughed field on the edge of a vast open plain on a dark winter night." --- Franz Kafka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SG
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
star downloader have this downloading in tray too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Founder
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,480
Rep Power: 179 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
When I was on Dialup I used DAP5 alot since moving to cable a few years ago I dont use any. sometimes corrupted downloads can occur with accelerators.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Flash Banner Hater
|
Download Express ( http://www.metaproducts.com )
It's a free (LITE) taster for MASS DOWNLOADER. It lacks any real management features (no scheduling, but latest ver can autoscan with many AV's) Partial downloads are tagged in a program subgroup, and may be restarted from there. Includes throttling, a feature lacking in many others!
__________________
Mary had a little lamb, Her father shot it dead Now Mary takes her lamb to school, Between two crusts of bread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
DriverHeaven Addict
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: slovenia-maribor
Posts: 326
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
i have cable ,and don't have to use any of this ones
__________________
NF7-S,AMD 2500+@2300MHz-&SP97+ 92mm vantec tornado on 2800rpm, MSi 5900SP 2X256MB Hyperx PC3200 DM+9 120GB SATA HDD Yamaha cd-rw 20/10/40 WIN XP PRO(SP1) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Professional Slacker
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: KY
Posts: 274
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
I am on a satellite connection and using DAP I can avg around 250-300K a second, only get around 80-90 without it. Star Downloader looks amazingly similar though...lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SG
Posts: 185
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
yep, esp. if the server is slow and the speed is around 20kb/s. with dap or star downloader, you get twice to four times the speed. Yes, i have cable too.
If i need to download serveral big files, i will queue them up.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Java programmer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 125
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
I use DAP and it works as smooth as baby's butt
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|