|
|||||||
| Hardware Discussion & Support Discuss your computer - its components or ANY hardware, past/current/future you want, or ask our forum experts if you have a general problem with your hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
unplugged
|
Firewalls (continued)
Continued from feedback-
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/showthre...013#post289013 Quote:
Yeah, after looking at that list I see it is pretty outdated. I use NAV 2002, but I only use it for full system scans and email scanning. I don't even have auto protect or script blocking on, NAV just pops up when open my emails, it doesn't even go into the sys tray when I start my machine. Actually I've never run into any so called "problems" with the current setup I have besides the one I described in the post above. I think maybe ZAP was just doing it's job and got hung up or something. It does block quite a few scans every day, but it has never used that many CPU cycles before, and I can't even say that it was then either, something was, but I couldn't tell what, even in the task manager. The only other thing I have running is Google toolbar- it blocks pop-ups that I set it to block. I did 2 full system scans w/ NAV after an update list and it came out clean, of course that doesn't guarantee anything.... I've never had any virus infections though- but I've cleaned many off other people's machines. "The Cleaner", I'll have to look that up- One more thing I forgot, once in a while I'll use peer guardian just experimenting w/ it- Usually when I turn it on it instantly blocks a few IP's and I see them in the log. The funny thing is that allot a times it blocks 127.0.0.1: xxxx Like I just turned it on, looked at the logs and I see this, which is common. 01-31-2004, 12:05:27, 68.168.78.100:110 01-31-2004, 12:05:27, 127.0.0.1: 1287 That seems strange to me, and I'm not sure but I think that 127.0.0.1:1287 is blocking an internal port or something..... Everything seems fine now as far as what happened the other day, unless someone is very sneaky and deliberately trying to hack my system, but I really doubt it. EDIT- just since I wrote this post, now this is what my PG logs look like just for the past few minutes- this is normal for me though, and I havent' even been surfing around. 01-31-2004, 12:13:40, 216.127.74.135:80 01-31-2004, 12:13:42, 63.208.33.9:80 01-31-2004, 12:13:43, 66.150.87.2:80 01-31-2004, 12:13:43, 12.130.12.31:80 01-31-2004, 12:13:43, 63.208.33.8:80 01-31-2004, 12:14:17, 168.143.100.10:80 01-31-2004, 12:15:33, 64.0.96.8:80 It's doing something-and these are things that ZA probably wouldn't block with the settings I run.
__________________
Last edited by BWX; Jan 31, 2004 at 05:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unplugged
|
Actually I was just going through the logs of P/G and found something I really like seeing-
01-22-2004, 04:21:21, 66.35.229.209:80 Rejected: 66.35.229.209 - GainCME (Spyware) (01-22-2004 @ 04:21:21) 01-22-2004, 04:24:35, 209.225.5.229:80 That makes it worth running right there- it probably just blocked an ad or something, but still, my girlfriend used this PC too- so she might do something or get tricked by an add or email that I would know not to open/click on. Actually PG seems to get along well with ZAP and NAV, and doesn't seem to cause problems. It only blocks TCP though, and that's why I think I'm gonna check out that Protowall as seen in the news on the front page. http://www.hardwareheaven.com/index.ph...articleid=9630 The more I learn about Firewalls, and RIAA blockers, the more I want to use them and learn how to configure them. I can't believe I used to not run any firewall at all- But I did, and I never got one single virus that I know of. But I always used my head and kept windows up to date too which is just about as good as running a software firewall... Soon I will be getting a NAT router, and using the hardware firewall and ditch software firewalls all together.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
NAV 2001 - 2004 uses the same dat files, just scan engine improving on newer versions. but if you find it take very long time for scanning an outbound mail and you like to use Norton, Or for your next re-format.. go with the Symantec Crop v7.6 - v8.0 (if you can find it) or NAV 2003. as for FW... i'd suggest you to keep ZAP as for now but do this.. go to E-mail Protecttion and turn off the MailSafe. use only NAV for all email scanning. for your next re-format, check out the combination of NAV 2003 and Norton Personnel Firewall 2003. personally, i do not use nortons atm, i've tested most of nortons retail versions, AV, FW, Systemworks and Ghost, i only keep Ghost 2003. i'm not try to convince you here, what i use on my internet PC atm and like it are.. Trend Micro internet Security v11., ZA Free, AdMuncher. its the set of my protection for antivirus, FW, Ads/popups.. i ran 2 FW softwares, both Trend Micro and ZA are on at all time. ZA gives me program notification, AdMuncher do Ads/popups a whole lot better than ZA Pro, Proxomitron is also good (and free) for Ads/popups. IMO, Trend Micro (this version) includes very solid FW and AV. Quote:
and ZAP was trying to do its job.. Quote:
(http://www.emsisoft.com/en/software/personal/) i never use it but i've seen they have a free version on their site. Quote:
the PG is designed for logging your movement on the web and protect whatever you've config it to do and it all shows on its logs. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unplugged
|
Thasnks for tips, I'll try that cleaner and a2 scanner.
I also messed around with snort a little- But it's all command line- and not very user friendly- What I was trying to do with snort was to use it as an ITS, but ONLY log when it detected an intrusion possibility. I couldn't figure it out so I just quite using it. I still have it installed on my system though. Man, when I let it go into sniffer mode it spits out all kinds of network info- it looks like it's telling me everything going on on my default gateway- or who ever is on my node for my ISP. Basically just a bunch of IP addresses and that they are "tell"ing their default gateway or something. I wish Snort had a GUI, I could probably figure it out then. I was just experimenting with it though, I really don't need that running at all. I will definitely be getting something like that "the cleaner" or "a2 scanner"- just to be on the safe side, you can't be to careful when you're using an "always on" cable internet connection w/o a router.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
more SECURITY TIPS for windows...
Quote:
here's SECURITY TIPS for windows... Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
AntiTrojan Tools..
http://lists.gpick.com/pages/AntiTrojan_Tools.htm the The Cleaner is easy to use but if you're going to pay for this kind of program, check out the TDS-3 its one of the best out there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Live from the Dungeon
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Between the SubWoofers
Posts: 1,395
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Without a firewall, you will be seen and your ports will merely be "Closed" instead of stealth. It's like wearing a t-shirt in the middle of winter claiming it is ok when you should be wearing your big winter coat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Live from the Dungeon
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Between the SubWoofers
Posts: 1,395
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]()
|
Quote:
TDS-3 ROCKS!!! I bought that 2 years ago and I will NEVER use any other anti-trojan app. Daily updates and you just can't fool the program. It was more then worth the $50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unplugged
|
Quote:
The funny thing is, all that time I didn't use firewall, I never got attacked- It's really amazing to me that nothing weird ever happened. I won't even turn my PC on without a firewall up now- I know not being in stealth mode is really crazy these days. I think Windows should come with an App. just like ZA Pro- The built in firewall is weak. I mean the whole problem is Windows in the first place, if XP came with a robust firewall and had a help file associated w/ it, imagine how much harder it would be for people to start these nasty viruses. Even if I need to install a program or do a defrag or anything that I think I should turn off my firewall to accomplish, I always hit the standby button on my cable modem or disable my internet connection temporarily. I have Zone Alarm set up on my Parent's PC, and I told both my brother's about it- You should have seen how much work ZAP was doing on my Mom's machine when I first turned it on! It stopped about 3000 scans in the first 2 days! She's in a different part of NYS- She has RoadRunner- I have Adelphia, I think RR where she is, is a much "dirtier" network. When I go home to check the logs I cannot believe how much work ZAP is doing. It's pretty amazing she never got hacked before too- she was running Win XP home with cable ISP and no Firewall for years also- I always had Norton on there with Auto-protect and Script-blocking, but that's not enough. When her subscription for that ran out she went out and got NAV 2003- It is crazy to not run a firewall- I was talking to a lvl 2 tech at Adelphia the other day and he was telling me how they are starting to just shut people off when they are transmitting viruses out of their boxes- he also told me that they are starting to fine people who don't update their windows and if they are infected more than once. I think they should too- it's those people who are transmitting these viruses all over the place and costing the ISP's tons of money- and it's just because they have no idea what's going on.
__________________
Last edited by BWX; Feb 1, 2004 at 06:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unplugged
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unplugged
|
Quote:
Lists of Lists- Nice-- I know this will come in handy.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
when talking about Internet Security in XP, by using native OS features, meaning there'll be no adding any new software or drivers to it. we can still do alot of thing in XP, Not just using the inbuilt firewall, let make it more capable/effective, adding IPSec Policies (Internet Protocol Security Policies - secpol.msc) and importing the windows Hosts file, both are XP IP security related features. i believe it should cames out well enough (also believed, it'll be a very long learning, lots of confusing and painful).
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|