|
|||||||
| Hardware Discussion & Support Discuss your computer - its components or ANY hardware, past/current/future you want, or ask our forum experts if you have a general problem with your hardware. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,940
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Dual Channel DDR boards
How do Dual Channel DDR boards fair against regular DDR boards? Is there a BIG difference? Are they worth it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Their quite faster especially if your processor can make use of the increased bandwidth like your P4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: In clothing
Posts: 3,510
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Well the ram has twice the bandwidth, so however fast your ram is now it will be twice as fast in a dual channel board, unless you one have one stick of ram in that case you wont notice a difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,940
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Does Dual Channel DDR work better w/ P4's or AMD's? i.e. a P4 2.4B or a Athlon XP 2600 333FSB?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Hmm... I hate to say this but P4 has the advantage. The Athlons are setup to only access so much bandwidth. However, the Athlons do have some benefit from more memory bandwidth. Take the nforce2 boards for example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Driverage Snipe
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada or NYC, USA
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Yep, in general, more bandwith is better, so supply it with whatever it needs
__________________
![]() Antec SX1030 Case - Enermax 431 W Whisper PS - 4 Case Fans -ThermalRight AX-7 With Panaflo Ultra Fan - Sb Audigy / Logitech Z-560 Speakers / Sennheiser HD497 Headphones WD 80GB 7200 rpm HD - Samsung SyncMaster 955DF - LG 16x10x40x Burner / Pionner 16x Slot DVD View my rig http://nl.dodhq.net/Rig/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Flash Banner Hater
|
ISTR that for the Nforce and Nforce 2 chipsets (for AMD)
The most telling improvement with Dual-DDR was on the onboard graphics - logic also dictates that Dual-DDR would be required for full memory to AGP 8x bandwidth to be achieved. Small improvemants were noted otherwise, but as the CPU itself only has a single DDR interface to the rest of the syatem, the most that dual-DDR can achieve in that respect is a bit of optimized prefetch. Despite many saying that the Nforce 2 is NOT good with non-synchronous RAM/CPU. One test rated Dual-DDR (at 400 RAM, 333 CPU) above synchronous 333 working. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Painlord of Ichor
Join Date: May 2002
Location: bloinkin!
Posts: 1,610
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]()
|
sd
Using PC2100 ddr memory in dual channel mode on a P4 granite bay, it's almost exactly as fast as PC1066 rambus. Which is cool, because DDR is cheaper...especially 2100.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
So what would PC3200 do on a Granite Bay board??? Is there any reviews or test on the web for this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
I don't think anyone has these boards done yet
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,940
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Yeah,
no Granite Bay boards support PC3200 yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,940
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Intel is planing to release boards that support dual-channel DDR400 in mid-2003. They will be less expensive then the current dual-channel DDR266 boards, because they will be 4-layer instead of the current 6-layer.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|