HardwareHeaven.com
Looking for the skin chooser?
 
 
  • Home

  • Reviews

  • Articles

  • News

  • Tools

  • GamingHeaven

  • Forums

  • Network

 

Go Back   HardwareHeaven.com > Forums > News > Hardware Reviews


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 3, 2008, 12:38 PM   #1
DriverHeaven Founder
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,480
Rep Power: 177
Zardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refute

DH Review: XFX Motherboard Roundup

Read The Review Here
___________________________

Every hardware enthusiast should know the name XFX as they are synonymous with the fastest performing Nvidia products on the market. Whether you are shopping for the ultimate graphics card or the highest specification motherboard it is hard to go wrong with the XFX branded versions.

High end is not their only area of expertise however and recently XFX offered us the opportunity to review a number of their value segment motherboards with onboard graphics, they told us that their products were capable of taking on the best AMD and Intel had to offer. This is quite a claim so after tracking down some impressive AM2/Socket 775 boards we put XFX to their word.
Zardon is offline   Reply With Quote


Old Aug 3, 2008, 05:15 PM   #2
HH Assassin Guild Member
 
IvanV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,655
Rep Power: 280
IvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his statusIvanV is godlike in his status
System Specs

The biggest impression is how the to socket 775 systems managed to stay on pair (and even beat) G33, despite being limited to only one memory channel. I was expecting that to have a much greater impact when the boards were paired with a quad core processor.
__________________
Our Folding@home stats:
IvanV is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 3, 2008, 08:14 PM   #3
127.0.0.1
 
CDsDontBurn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,458
Rep Power: 202
CDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his status
System Specs

the boards are nice, i like the features of the boards and all except for the layout of the SATA ports.

if there is a card that would be long enough, like an 8800GT or 9600GT etc., it would interfere with the SATA ports and would limit you to just two SATA Ports.
__________________

CDsDontBurn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2008, 07:53 PM   #4
Flash Banner Hater
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,410
Rep Power: 91
Matth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenMatth has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seen
System Specs

Something must be wrong, how can single channel beat dual channel?

The only thing I can think of, working the RAM at dual 667 and tighter (correct for 667) timings may have been better, as it is matched to 1333 FSB.

If the RAM was at 800, then that kind of suggests that the Nvidia chipset is better at pulling together an odd FSB to RAM ratio than the Intel chipset - with a "natural" setup of dual channel RAM at half FSB, I'd expect the Intel chipset to walk it in every round.
__________________
Mary had a little lamb,
Her father shot it dead
Now Mary takes her lamb to school,
Between two crusts of bread
Matth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 4, 2008, 11:11 PM   #5
Administrator
 
Veridian3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Cloaked
Posts: 4,833
Rep Power: 174
Veridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his statusVeridian3 is godlike in his status

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matth View Post
Something must be wrong, how can single channel beat dual channel?

The only thing I can think of, working the RAM at dual 667 and tighter (correct for 667) timings may have been better, as it is matched to 1333 FSB.

If the RAM was at 800, then that kind of suggests that the Nvidia chipset is better at pulling together an odd FSB to RAM ratio than the Intel chipset - with a "natural" setup of dual channel RAM at half FSB, I'd expect the Intel chipset to walk it in every round.
There is nothing wrong as such but some tests are more reliant on memory bandwidth than others. For example if we were to run PCmarks memory tests on the systems the G33 would win with ease. Additionally it didnt lose every real world test, the video encoding for example is much faster on the intel chipset than the nvidia. ( http://www.hardwareheaven.com/reviews....=603&pageid=12 )


In general though you have made a reasonable point about how well Nvidia do with their memory performance. The 790i tends to be a little faster than the X48 and as the review showed the 8200 beats AMD's own 790G. They are also great with memory configuration options and the option to Link/unlink speeds is by far the best available... thats not to say they are without fault because compatibility can be an issue at times and there are some little quirks surrounding how much memory you can use at particular speeds... or what slots you can use.
Veridian3 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools