|
|||||||
| Motherboards, Networking and Misc Forum Need the newest 4-in-1s? Some nForce drivers? some other driver you need? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Dual-Channel memory!!!
quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maxwell1234 wrote on 05-16-2003 09:12 AM: hi digital, i would like to ask you a few questions...........first of all, what's is dual -channel DDR actually?? and can my motherboard support it?? by the way, what are the criterias of selecting good stick of ram?? cause i've just found out mine.....its "APACER PC 2100 UNB CL2" Last edited by Kgentatszu]; May 16, 2003 at 04:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Guys, any help appreciated...........apart from that, which motherboard can support dual-channel ddr??( at low affordable prices )
Last edited by Kgentatszu]; May 16, 2003 at 04:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
I don't know too much about Intel selections,
but I believe boards based on the E7205 "Granite Bay" chipset or the i875P "Canterwood" chipset are the ones which support Dual-Channel DDR (not sure about prices.) What Dual-Channel does is increase the available amount of maximum memory bandwidth, if the FSB doesn't already limit it. It looks like you've overclocked your FSB to around 600MHz, which equates to a badwidth of about 4800 MB/s. But, since your RAM is at 190MHz DDR, that amounts to about 3040 MB/s. The amount of maximum theoretical memory bandwidth, is always the lower figure of the two. (sort of like only strong as the weakest link) So right now you only have 3040 MB/s. This is where Dual-Channel comes in. If you were to run memory at 190MHz DDR, in Dual-Channel, it provides for double the previous figure: 6080 MB/s. So with Dual-Channel DDR, you would now have 4800 MB/s available (since it is limited by the FSB bandwidth.) hope that helps somewhat
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
wow, that's kinda hard for me to understand/digest............simplify it, please....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
Ok, basically the point of DualChannel is so you have more bandwidth
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In your case: your FSB gives 4800 your RAM gives 3040 your bandwidth is the lower number, so 3040 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What Dual-Channel does is double your RAM number. So with Dual-Channel, your FSB gives 4800 your RAM gives 6080 your bandwidth is the lower number, so 4800 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ So before, your bandwidth is: 3040 But, with Dual-Channel, it is: 4800 That's what Dual Channel is for, to increase available memory bandwidth. better?
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
where do you get 3040 and 4800? and why is it always the lower number?? and how much performance boost will i gain from dual-channel DDR?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
confutatis maledictis
|
Quote:
![]() You take the take the MHz speed and multiply by 8. So your FSB is 600MHz times 8 = 4800 In the case of RAM, multiply the MHz by 2 if it is DDR. Your RAM is 190 times 2 times 8 = 3040 Quote:
![]() Maybe think of it this way, if you had 10 hot dogs and only 8 buns, you could only have 8 dog&bun sets. But if you had 10 hot dogs and 16 buns, you could have 10 dog&bun sets ![]() Quote:
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
lol~, GOOD EXPLAINATION VAMPY..........i got it. thankz.....but 1-10% isnt that a bit low?? i was expecting at least 50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
Well, you have to consider that you're just talking about memory here, not a CPU or video card upgrade that would bring significant changes. Not even talking about increasing the amount of memory, like from 128MB to 512MB. Only how memory transfers are conducted. I think a 5% increase from something so subtle should be satisfactory.
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
so, in your oppinion, is it worth the replacement of my new MOBO?? By the way, vampy, hope you REALYY enjoy the shiny card!!!! i'm planning on gettin one too....
and remember to change your signature... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
If you want to replace your mobo just for the Dual-Channel, I'd say no, save your money for something else.
I'd say just wait until you actually need a new mobo (like for a new CPU or some other major reason,) then you can go ahead and get something with Dual-Channel at that time. But spending that much money just for ~5% gain, is just not worth it to me. ![]() And . . . I Just Can't Wait!! until I get the new card
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
thankz Vampy, cause i was almost wanting to change my mobo right away...........
Last edited by Kgentatszu]; May 18, 2003 at 07:47 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
No problem
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Intel's solution is much more efficient that Nvidia's. Max, You would not have that much advantage to upgrading to a "cheap" Intel dual channel board because of your current ram speed plus the fact there is no "cheap" Dual Channel Intel MB. However, theoritcally you could put your current processor in a Canterwood board and not worry about stressing it too much because of your current OC. Honestly though since Intel is releasing new chipsets in the near future you would be better off doing a ram upgrade than anything else. However, a monitor upgrade wouldn't hurt either. 15"..I'm sorry but I would start donating plasma just to get something better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
confutatis maledictis
|
Oh, I didn't mean 5% bandwidth gain, I meant overall performance,
but if you have a better guess than my ~1-10%, I'm sure maxwell would appreciate it
__________________
Digitalis 3.3 Athlon 64 3000 // ASUS K8V SE Deluxe // 1024MB PC3200 (2-2-2-10 1T)
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 Pro // 20" Dell 2005FPW (DVI) M-Audio Revo 7.1 + Philips Acoustic Edge // Klipsch ProMedia 2.1 320/16 Western Digital WD3200KS + 120/8 Seagate 7200.7 NEC ND-3550A 16x DVD±RW + Lite-On 52x24x CD-RW Antec Sonata case // 480W Antec TruePower personal bests || Aq'3: 46796 | 3D'01: 20461 | 3D'03: 6336 | 3D'05: 2677 | PC'04: 4605 | PC'02: 7691,9092,1250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,802
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|