|
|||||||
| Motherboards, Networking and Misc Forum Need the newest 4-in-1s? Some nForce drivers? some other driver you need? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Mystic seeker
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 193
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
__________________
msi 6330 Athlon T-bird 1000 mhz 768mb sdr hd 80 gig eide ata 100 7200rpm western digital hd 30 gig eide ata 100 5600rpm western digital Sound Blaster Audigy retail 8500 275/275 19" Mitsubishi Diamondtron |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
the last samurai
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,086
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
get em here
installed these earlier today on top of the 4.38s and haven't had any problems (*knocking on wood)...i've had a slight increase (10-15%) in my hdd performance and 3dmark bench...
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the hidden place
Posts: 1,975
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
whats the word on these and winXP. some say use them anyway (1.38) and others say winXP has its own built in that it likes better. On a clean install, I tested the XP drivers and the 1.37 and the 1.38 and saw no difference in numbers. In fact from XP to .38 my cd read speed went down by a few k/s (from 2097 to 2091 on sandra2k2). 3dmark numbers were virtually the same. I guess I just wonder how many XP users use the 4in1 drivers and why? did you see a performance increase over the stock XP via driver set?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Got Satan?
Join Date: May 2002
Location: was in Canada, now in UAE
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
normally i would be scrambling to download them, but since im giving this pc away for my parents to use, i wont bother.
is performance better than the earlier release though? caus my next board will have a via chipset too, just so i know which ones to install. i noticed new agp drivers in this one, much difference? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
DriverHeaven Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: in the hidden place
Posts: 1,975
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
no performance boost at all. 3dmark drop @40 points.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hydrogenated Dumbass
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canuckland
Posts: 755
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
For me these drivers are slower than XP default drivers with or without George Breese's PCI Latency and Memory Interleave patches. HDD seek time did improve, but still not as good as with the PCI Latency patch
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
the last samurai
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,086
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
warning...this 4n1 set is not to be installed on a win98/NT system...keep using the 4.38s. something about MS giving up on the support for 98 and NT systems.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
A Legend in Underwear
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Unknown
Posts: 5,255
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
They will officially drop support for Windows95 in August this year Windows98 is still supported so I'd say thats FUD (but good fud )
__________________
Gentoo Linux - Developer (baselayout) Read my blog "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours." Stephen Roberts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Yarr... I be blind!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 3,191
Rep Power: 80 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I guess I'll have to give these a try on my ASUS board.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hydrogenated Dumbass
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canuckland
Posts: 755
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Oh... it seems to make my old KT133 look good know! The board is a GA-7ZM (gigabyte). It works great. Still know good on the KT133a (GA-7ZX-H)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,448
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
most the time I wont update via drivers but Im using the 4.40s and they work great.....im gonna update to the 4.40a set tomorrow when I get home from work
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Got Satan?
Join Date: May 2002
Location: was in Canada, now in UAE
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
i just installed those. gained 0.2fps in q3a lol
my Gore performance seems ok, ~80fps outside, ~120fps inside. system seems stable so far... then again the system has only been up for 20 minutes since installing them, did the quick install, went flawlessly. let's just hope everything stays in tip-top shape. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: US Of A
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Any Windows 2000 Feed Back?
__________________
Windows 2000 Professional SP-4-(Windows 98 Second Edition Dual Boot) A.T.I. All In Wonder Radeon 32 MB DDR (Catalyst 03.6/MMC/DVD 8.5/Power DVD 5.0 Pro Beta/DirectX 9.0a/Via Hyperion 4.45) AThlon 1.1GHz/1024 MB PC133 RAM (100x11 FSB)(Standard Settings) Western Digital 80GB ATA100/Western Digital 100GB ATA100/Western Digital 160GB 8MB Cache ATA-100 Sound Blaster Live 5.1 Platinum (5.12.2.252) ACER 16X DVD;ACER 12x10x32 CD-RW Adobe Premiere 6.5 PICVideo MJPEG 2.01a/HUFFY 2.11 Detailed System Specs |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Got Satan?
Join Date: May 2002
Location: was in Canada, now in UAE
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
look above.
/me = win2k no probs |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|