HardwareHeaven.com

HardwareHeaven.com

Looking for the skin chooser?
 
 
  • Home

  • Hardware reviews

  • Articles

  • News

  • Tools

  • Gaming at HardwareHeaven

  • Forums

 

Go Back   HardwareHeaven.com > Forums > Hardware and Related Topics > Motherboards, Networking and Misc Forum


Motherboards, Networking and Misc Forum Need the newest 4-in-1s? Some nForce drivers? some other driver you need?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Aug 10, 2005, 06:41 PM   #1
PAX Tweaker, PAX Expert.
 
Robert McClelland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Somewhere in Wood County Ohio Same Town :)
Posts: 10,668
Rep Power: 196
Robert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his status
System Specs

Gold Member
Big Grin I got my new hard drive You won't belive what they gave me

Gateway send me my replacement.
120 EIDE ULTRA ATA-100 HD 7200RPM Special ED W/8mb Cahce 3.5<Shock!
now my games would really fly. I hope new cats come out today. I be very happy man.
Thankyou Gateway.
__________________
"XTREME AUDIO IS CRAP!" "There no support for it. It's crapist card on face of the earth it should be throw into the sun"
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1949536385.png
correct the correct one now
Robert McClelland is offline   Reply With Quote


Old Aug 10, 2005, 07:10 PM   #2
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
 
Son_of_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,441
Rep Power: 0
Son_of_Thunder will become famous soon enoughSon_of_Thunder will become famous soon enough
System Specs

Awesome, what was it originally? I'm door watching right now, my 250GB Hitachi Deskstar SATAII drive is due at any moment
__________________
Son_of_Thunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 10, 2005, 08:58 PM Threadstarter Thread Starter   #3
PAX Tweaker, PAX Expert.
 
Robert McClelland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Somewhere in Wood County Ohio Same Town :)
Posts: 10,668
Rep Power: 196
Robert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his status
System Specs

Gold Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Son_of_Thunder
Awesome, what was it originally? I'm door watching right now, my 250GB Hitachi Deskstar SATAII drive is due at any moment
Well went my hard drive went out on Monday. It was 2mb cache So I think that why my harddrive die on me. for couple weeks my harddrive was going up 100F when idle. But thanks to gateway for there fast service I'm very please. Kinda shock they said 1-3 days. it show up today
__________________
"XTREME AUDIO IS CRAP!" "There no support for it. It's crapist card on face of the earth it should be throw into the sun"
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1949536385.png
correct the correct one now
Robert McClelland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2005, 05:27 AM   #4
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
The_Neon_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,009
Rep Power: 92
The_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the roughThe_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the roughThe_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the rough
System Specs

Bah I'll never willingly buy a branded PC. But good deal you got none the less....
__________________
The_Neon_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2005, 07:34 AM   #5
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 0
Zorg is on a distinguished road
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert McClelland
Gateway send me my replacement.
120 EIDE ULTRA ATA-100 HD 7200RPM Special ED W/8mb Cahce 3.5<Shock!
....
all ATAs are lame horses - better go SATA!
Zorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2005, 12:12 PM   #6
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
Tipstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Real capital of Canada: Torauna
Posts: 6,773
Rep Power: 191
Tipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his status
System Specs

Gold Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorg
all ATAs are lame horses - better go SATA!
Lame horses? Unless you are running a RAID setup there is no "huge" difference between SATA and PATA. I've seen a number of PATA drives outperform a number of SATA drives, however I've also seen the reverse. What it really boils down to is the drive itself, not the controller.

'Sides.. SATA are the true "lame horses" when compared to SATAII.
__________________


Portal: The Flash Version
_________________________________
Brain: So, you sacked the cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker?
Mr. Sackett: The second cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker I've sacked since the sixth sitting sheet slitter got sick.
Tipstaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2005, 10:08 PM   #7
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 0
Zorg is on a distinguished road
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tipstaff
Lame horses? Unless you are running a RAID setup there is no "huge" difference between SATA and PATA. I've seen a number of PATA drives outperform a number of SATA drives, however I've also seen the reverse. What it really boils down to is the drive itself, not the controller.

'Sides.. SATA are the true "lame horses" when compared to SATAII.
my old Maxtor PATAs scored about 35MB/s (Sandra) at UDMA6. I switched to two Seagate SATA (ide mode) and got 50MB/s. That's why I call it lame
I don't know what people are doing wrong when complaining that SATA is nearly the same as PATA. For me it has been quite a performance boost.
Zorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2005, 12:09 AM   #8
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
Tipstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Real capital of Canada: Torauna
Posts: 6,773
Rep Power: 191
Tipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his status
System Specs

Gold Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorg
I don't know what people are doing wrong when complaining that SATA is nearly the same as PATA. For me it has been quite a performance boost.
Not for me. I'm just saying that I've seen PATA drives outperform SATA, and vice versa. It depends on the drive, and configuration. You wouldn't expect that since the max transfer rate of a PATA drive is 133mb/s, while SATA is 1.5GB/s (SATAII 3GB/s), but it does happen.

In any case, for Robert to change over to SATA he'd not only have to buy an new drive, but a SATA controller. Don't think he's looking to do that just yet.
__________________


Portal: The Flash Version
_________________________________
Brain: So, you sacked the cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker?
Mr. Sackett: The second cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker I've sacked since the sixth sitting sheet slitter got sick.
Tipstaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2005, 12:28 AM Threadstarter Thread Starter   #9
PAX Tweaker, PAX Expert.
 
Robert McClelland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Somewhere in Wood County Ohio Same Town :)
Posts: 10,668
Rep Power: 196
Robert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his statusRobert McClelland is godlike in his status
System Specs

Gold Member
I don't have ATA hook up cable on this mother board It's only IDE cables
__________________
"XTREME AUDIO IS CRAP!" "There no support for it. It's crapist card on face of the earth it should be throw into the sun"
http://www.speedtest.net/result/1949536385.png
correct the correct one now
Robert McClelland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2005, 12:42 AM   #10
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
swimtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,040
Rep Power: 124
swimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refute
System Specs

Shoot! That PATA drive with the 8mb cache is a GREAT drive! It was FREE!!!
__________________
It's not so much getting your way that matters or not - what matters is how you go about getting it.
swimtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2005, 01:11 AM   #11
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 0
Zorg is on a distinguished road
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tipstaff
Not for me. I'm just saying that I've seen PATA drives outperform SATA, and vice versa. It depends on the drive, and configuration. You wouldn't expect that since the max transfer rate of a PATA drive is 133mb/s, while SATA is 1.5GB/s (SATAII 3GB/s), but it does happen.
....
I thought SATA is only 150mb/s - that's what HDTach tells
Zorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2005, 06:38 AM   #12
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
Tipstaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Real capital of Canada: Torauna
Posts: 6,773
Rep Power: 191
Tipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his statusTipstaff is godlike in his status
System Specs

Gold Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorg
I thought SATA is only 150mb/s - that's what HDTach tells
Sorry, typed GB/s in caps. Should have been Gb/s (gigabits/s). So, yes, SATA runs at 150 megabytes a second, while SATAII is 300 megabytes a second.

Something of note: you mentioned that your old drive was a UDMA66 drive. So, in effect, by going to a SATA drive you should notice a big increase in performance (2x the speed actually). However, PATA drives are usually ATA100/133 nowadays.
When you consider the highest PATA speed versus SATA, does 17 megabytes per second really make ALL that much of a difference? Not really.

Like I said, it all boils down to the drive itself, not the interface. With SATAII that will change dramatically as the interface will play a key roll in transfer speed.
__________________


Portal: The Flash Version
_________________________________
Brain: So, you sacked the cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker?
Mr. Sackett: The second cocky khaki Kicky Sack sock plucker I've sacked since the sixth sitting sheet slitter got sick.
Tipstaff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2005, 07:02 AM   #13
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 0
Zorg is on a distinguished road
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tipstaff
Sorry, typed GB/s in caps. Should have been Gb/s (gigabits/s). So, yes, SATA runs at 150 megabytes a second, while SATAII is 300 megabytes a second.

Something of note: you mentioned that your old drive was a UDMA66 drive. So, in effect, by going to a SATA drive you should notice a big increase in performance (2x the speed actually). However, PATA drives are usually ATA100/133 nowadays.
When you consider the highest PATA speed versus SATA, does 17 megabytes per second really make ALL that much of a difference? Not really.
....
Considering that especially Maxtor (Desktop line) is worst at Write performance - those 17MB made a hell of a difference for me. Seagate's Read/Write performance is equally high. It was sorta double impact for me

PS: I wrote UDMA 6 that is ATA 133
Zorg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools