|
|||||||
| Other Tech News The latest community based technology news from across the globe. (If you aren't a community newsposter then use the "Submit News" section.) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Int'l Fish Liaison
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 16,197
Rep Power: 112 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Zune vs iPod in the Real World
Source: DailyTech
__________ A lot of comparisons have been made between the new 5.5G 30GB iPod and the Microsoft Zune on paper. The two players share the same hard drive capacity, but the Zune throws in a larger 3" screen, FM tuner and WiFi capabilities. And as we just recently found out, the two players also share the same $250 price tag. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Get off my lawn!
|
I actually think the zune looks pretty nice and has a cool gui, to bad is so thick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
Something else that has been bothering me about this Zune vs iPod comparision: battery life. I keep seeing the battery comparison being quoted as close, almost 2-4 hours difference in charge life to the iPod Nano. Problem is, those are old iPod Nano specs. Apple recently (1-2 months ago) changed their designs for the iPod Nano and 80GB iPod. The Nanos now come with up to 24 hours of battery life.. 2x that of Zunes, while the 80GB iPod has up to 20 hours. Granted, the 80GB isn't in it's price range, but the Nano is the direct competitor to the Zune, and here again we see the iPod beating it. Again we see another stupid comparison. Why would MS tout their unit as having similar iPod battery life, when that is no longer the case? The fact that they know it, yet STILL maintain that comparision, to me, is another minus against the Zune (and Microsoft for being so stupid). If those three missing wireless features were in the Zune, and the battery life was still as close as they were originally, then this comparison would be no contest: Zune wins. As of right now, Apple still has the more appealing device. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Twice the fun!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,404
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
2 things I don't like about the iPod.
1) Not able to move music from Ipod to PC *something to do with 'limiting pirates' 2) No customizable categories. Screw genre, artist...half of them don't sort correctly anyway! 3) iTunes...what a joke ...ok so I had 3. I like my 30Gb but the minute I find a hack to get around #2 (and 3 [I know how to get around #1]) I'm doing it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,472
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
And if you really do care about battery, get samsung or creative players since they got MUCH longer battery life. My bro's MP3 player which is just a tad bigger than the nano (just in height) has 40 hours... My Nano has 15 hours (newer ones a bit more). Honestly, I do hope M$ wins... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Get off my lawn!
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,472
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Why anyone would want to watch videos on a 1.5" screen is beyond me... And also, the Nano only has a max of 8GB while the Zune and normal iPod is quite a bit larger.
I stand by my notion that Zune is vs the Normal iPOd
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Twice the fun!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,404
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
I'm glad the new Ipod Video's finally support 480p output! 320x240 is a killer
![]() Lessens overall amount of storage but who cares! Even at full-res DVD, on a 30GB Ipod, thats still FIVE COMPLETE MOVIES! I STILL wish they'd allow custom categories. I like the way my MP3's are sorted on my server (by my own organization). If I could do that with an ipod, I'd praise it till the end of the world! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
I have a 5G Ipod, and what is this Itunes thing every one keeps doing about?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|