|
|||||||
| Other Tech News The latest community based technology news from across the globe. (If you aren't a community newsposter then use the "Submit News" section.) |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
News Guru
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,400
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
NVIDIA Detonator 43.45, with 3DMark2003 Optimisation
Just got word from AC @ Nvmax.com that he's posted details of what's new in Detonator 43.45 and had a chat with a Nvidia spokesperson...
The driver includes new optimisations for the 3DMark 2003 performance tool, disregarding FutureMarks call for no such optimisations to be included. With the new driver some tests perform upto 300% better than previous drivers. NVIDIA Detonator 43.45, with 3DMark2003 Optimisation |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,940
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Why would nVidia optimize drivers for a benchmark which they said doesn't give real results?
Last edited by Dom; Mar 28, 2003 at 04:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
HardwareHeaven Lover
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brunei
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
you should asked them yourself. for me, as long the drivers are stable and up-to-date. thats all i want
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,940
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Lover
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Brunei
Posts: 127
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
just send them email.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 613
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
i tested these drivers
and 300% wouldnt proly happen more like 1% |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Twice the fun!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,404
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
I just jumped from 10786 to 11720 in 2001se so I'm happy
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,940
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Colour Commentator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Highland, IN USA
Posts: 5,619
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Well, isn't that special.
So they've optimized their drivers for an irrelevant benchmark that they put no stock in? Interesting.....
__________________
WTF is up with the sigs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Twice the fun!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,404
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
GeForce Ti 4600 @ 325+735
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Croatia
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
nForcer that score is too low.
Anyway, these drivers DO NOT have the 3DMark03 optimzations, read the interview. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Twice the fun!
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,404
Rep Power: 0 ![]()
|
Too low?
Dell Dimension 8100
Pentium IV @ 2.4Ghz (non OCC) 1,024MB PC800 RDRAM w/ECC VisionTek Xtacy GeForce Ti 4600 occ'd (325Mhz GPU - 735Mhz Memory) with GeForce cooler/heatsinks Detonator 43.45's -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 3dMark2001SE - 11,720 3dMark2003 - (not benched yet) ...and thats low? Why does that appears low to you? Last edited by nForcer; Mar 29, 2003 at 07:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 613
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
could be becuse of that ecc mem
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
DriverHeaven Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Croatia
Posts: 69
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Sorry, I was plastered yesterday and saw 1700.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Re: NVIDIA Detonator 43.45, with 3DMark2003 Optimisation
Quote:
and ati has never done that? sure has so whats the big deal? and then tell my why those benching them are showing a LOWER score ??? any one complainabout optimized drivers should then post thier scores with 3.0 then 3.1's (posted the day before 3dmark a publicly released) and then the 3.2's what that a perfomace boost?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|