Samsung Electronics Announces High-Speed RDRAM

~~David~~ · Jun 12, 2002, 09:48 PM

Seoul, Korea – May 30, 2002: Samsung Electronics, the world’s leading memory solutions provider, announces a 32bit RIMM4200 module, an industry first high-speed RDRAM module. The new module has a 2-channel feature boasting record operating speeds of 4.2gigabytes per second (GBps). This is 4X faster than a conventional SDRAM module and 2X the performance of DDR SDRAM module

In addition, two RIMM4200 modules, in parallel, presented in a 64bit data bus system will generate speeds of 8.4GBps. Thus highlighting emphasizing the Rambus DRAM solution as a driving force in the high-performance memory market.

http://www.samsungelectronics.com/se...64437_101.html

oooooo I like 8.2GBps but lower the dang latency!!!!! er@32ns ram

Yeti · Jun 13, 2002, 01:38 AM

32 ns? are you sure that is right? :/ ?

~~David~~ · Jun 13, 2002, 03:13 AM

yes pc800=40ns
pc1066 = 32ns

very high latency
pc3200=5ns
pc2700=5.5ns
pc2100=6ns

Yeti · Jun 16, 2002, 07:13 PM

32ns @ 1066... thats what .....errrr.... cas 35? lol.... how many cycles does it take?

Jun 12, 2002, 09:48 PM	#1
~~David~~ Banned Join Date: May 2002 Location: Atlanta Posts: 959 Rep Power: 0	Samsung Electronics Announces High-Speed RDRAM Seoul, Korea – May 30, 2002: Samsung Electronics, the world’s leading memory solutions provider, announces a 32bit RIMM4200 module, an industry first high-speed RDRAM module. The new module has a 2-channel feature boasting record operating speeds of 4.2gigabytes per second (GBps). This is 4X faster than a conventional SDRAM module and 2X the performance of DDR SDRAM module In addition, two RIMM4200 modules, in parallel, presented in a 64bit data bus system will generate speeds of 8.4GBps. Thus highlighting emphasizing the Rambus DRAM solution as a driving force in the high-performance memory market. http://www.samsungelectronics.com/se...64437_101.html oooooo I like 8.2GBps but lower the dang latency!!!!! er@32ns ram

Jun 13, 2002, 01:38 AM	#2
Yeti DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 662 Rep Power: 0	32 ns? are you sure that is right? :/ ? __________________ --Oh lord not again

Jun 16, 2002, 07:13 PM	#4
Yeti DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 662 Rep Power: 0	32ns @ 1066... thats what .....errrr.... cas 35? lol.... how many cycles does it take? __________________ --Oh lord not again

Jun 13, 2002, 03:13 AM	Thread Starter #3
~~David~~ Banned Join Date: May 2002 Location: Atlanta Posts: 959 Rep Power: 0	yes pc800=40ns pc1066 = 32ns very high latency pc3200=5ns pc2700=5.5ns pc2100=6ns