LCD's 17" and Larger Reviewed

**MIG-31** · Jun 9, 2004, 06:16 PM

"We scrutinized five of the latest LCD monitors from the likes of LG and Iiyama and saw what new contenders from BenQ and Dell had to offer. See what LCD graphics and game performance is like today at a price range of $615 to $1,050."

Full article: tomshardware

@/2ct!< · Jun 9, 2004, 10:07 PM

Stupid toms, this article was published on their french site a month ago, I see how it is...

dipstick · Jun 9, 2004, 10:27 PM

Damn, he crapped on all of them

But this I really liked..

Quote:

While it has specs that you can only dream of, the 2001FP is not a gamer's monitor. The afterglow is too visible. To get an idea, it's worse than monitors based on TN + Films, and these are often considered low-end products. Most MVA monitors, although 25 ms, also have a lower afterglow. At best, you can entertain the idea of a few slower games from time to time. Forget about FPS championship training on this

Tom is definitely on crack. I have a Samsung 191T 25ms LCD sitting next to the 2001FP and that it is SO not true. The difference in everything is beyond imagination. Infact I will never look at another CTR again because of this monitor. Me thinks he needs better glasses or at least pull his head out of his rear end. Totally goes against what Anand had to say about it..

Jun 9, 2004, 06:16 PM	#1
MIG-31 HardwareHeaven News Mod Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Nottingham,UK Posts: 56,854 Rep Power: 471 System Specs	LCD's 17" and Larger Reviewed "We scrutinized five of the latest LCD monitors from the likes of LG and Iiyama and saw what new contenders from BenQ and Dell had to offer. See what LCD graphics and game performance is like today at a price range of $615 to $1,050." Full article: tomshardware

Jun 9, 2004, 10:07 PM	#2
@/2ct!< HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Not Vegas, anymore :( Posts: 1,391 Rep Power: 0	Stupid toms, this article was published on their french site a month ago, I see how it is... __________________