The Future of DHzer0point

pr0digal jenius · Feb 17, 2005, 12:32 AM

Time to buckle down and roll out another DH zer0point set before too long. However, after much debate Drew and I have decided to let you guys decide. We personally hate the idea of optimizing drivers beyond the "ugly" threshold simply in the name of frame rates. Anyone who has tried our drivers can most likely testify to this and we are more then aware that our drivers don't always push out the impressive 3DMark scores some others do, but we're in it for the IQ.

So, we are passing the mantle of decision on to you, our users. Should we continue releasing "Performance", "Balanced", and "Quality" sets, or should we simply focus on "Quality" and leave the other areas to the other guys?

*NOTE* Focusing on quality drivers only allows for more frequent releases, as well as more time spent on adding some cool new things we have cooking up, as well as Catalyst drivers

===================
Discuss and Vote Here

Feb 17, 2005, 12:32 AM	#1
pr0digal jenius Delete Me Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 14,648 Rep Power: 0	The Future of DHzer0point Time to buckle down and roll out another DH zer0point set before too long. However, after much debate Drew and I have decided to let you guys decide. We personally hate the idea of optimizing drivers beyond the "ugly" threshold simply in the name of frame rates. Anyone who has tried our drivers can most likely testify to this and we are more then aware that our drivers don't always push out the impressive 3DMark scores some others do, but we're in it for the IQ. So, we are passing the mantle of decision on to you, our users. Should we continue releasing "Performance", "Balanced", and "Quality" sets, or should we simply focus on "Quality" and leave the other areas to the other guys? NOTE Focusing on quality drivers only allows for more frequent releases, as well as more time spent on adding some cool new things we have cooking up, as well as Catalyst drivers =================== Discuss and Vote Here