Budget GPU Comparison: TurboCache vs HyperMemory

**MIG-31** · May 6, 2005, 06:29 PM

Both NVIDIA and ATI know that the real profit margins in the GPU business don't lie in the hands of enthusiasts that buy $500 graphics cards. Instead it is in the hands of the multiple OEMs that buy thousands and thousands of cards for systems being built; and those cards tend to lean in the direction of budget GPUs. Thus it was no surprise that both companies were on to the press with their offerings of a new solution for low cost systems that utilize the PCI Express bus.
_______________
Review: PC Perspective

May 6, 2005, 06:29 PM	#1
MIG-31 HardwareHeaven News Mod Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Nottingham,UK Posts: 55,783 Rep Power: 444 System Specs	Budget GPU Comparison: TurboCache vs HyperMemory Both NVIDIA and ATI know that the real profit margins in the GPU business don't lie in the hands of enthusiasts that buy $500 graphics cards. Instead it is in the hands of the multiple OEMs that buy thousands and thousands of cards for systems being built; and those cards tend to lean in the direction of budget GPUs. Thus it was no surprise that both companies were on to the press with their offerings of a new solution for low cost systems that utilize the PCI Express bus. _______________ Review: PC Perspective __________________ Please Post Your News Submissions Here