NeroLinux Review @ Cd Freaks

Zardon · Jun 12, 2005, 07:54 PM

“During the review period the application proved solid and robust and never crashed once. It does however lack a lot of features that one has come to expect from a burn application. There are no wizards to guide you through, and hold your hand while you create your masterpiece. Some may see this as a bonus. Some will not be able to manage without those wizards. “

read here

Matth · Jun 13, 2005, 06:15 PM

As a bonus for people already using Nero 6 on a Windows system, maybe, but if you've decided to "go Linux", then you might as well use the free tools provided in pretty well every Linux distro.

The same argument does not apply to Windows XP, as the Windows burning capabilities are basic in the extreme.

http://www.k3b.org/ - take a look at K3b - who needs Nero on Linux (KDE) ?
There does not seem to be such a definitive standard for Gnome

Jun 12, 2005, 07:54 PM	#1
Zardon DriverHeaven Founder Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 32,480 Rep Power: 177	NeroLinux Review @ Cd Freaks “During the review period the application proved solid and robust and never crashed once. It does however lack a lot of features that one has come to expect from a burn application. There are no wizards to guide you through, and hold your hand while you create your masterpiece. Some may see this as a bonus. Some will not be able to manage without those wizards. “ read here

Jun 13, 2005, 06:15 PM	#2
Matth Flash Banner Hater Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: UK Posts: 3,410 Rep Power: 91 System Specs	As a bonus for people already using Nero 6 on a Windows system, maybe, but if you've decided to "go Linux", then you might as well use the free tools provided in pretty well every Linux distro. The same argument does not apply to Windows XP, as the Windows burning capabilities are basic in the extreme. http://www.k3b.org/ - take a look at K3b - who needs Nero on Linux (KDE) ? There does not seem to be such a definitive standard for Gnome