ATi X900 Series Specs ?

daRk_heLmet · Jun 24, 2005, 04:26 PM

Radeon X900 XT-PE
• 32 Pixel-Pipelines
• 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten
• 90nm low-k bei TSMC
• 500 Mhz Chiptakt
• 700 MHz (1,4 Ghz) Speichertakt
• 512 MB GDDR-3

Radeon X900 XT
• 32 Pixel-Pipelines
• 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten
• 90nm low-k bei TSMC
• 450 Mhz Chiptakt
• 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt
• 512 MB GDDR-3

Radeon X900 Pro
• 24 Pixel-Pipelines
• 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten
• 90nm low-k bei TSMC
• 450 Mhz Chiptakt
• 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt
• 256/512 MB GDDR-3

Radeon X900
• 16 Pixel-Pipelines
• 8 Vertex-Shader Einheiten
• 110nm low-k bei TSMC
• 500 Mhz Chiptakt
• 500 MHz (1,0 Ghz) Speichertakt
• 256/512 MB GDDR-3
______________________
Read More/Source: ATi-News (Sorry, non-English)

riles9262 · Jun 24, 2005, 05:13 PM

If true they look pretty hefty.

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 05:28 PM

1400mhz, 1,2ns ram... who makes those?? 1,6ns by samsung, rated at 1250mhz..

hmmm, i'm sKeptic

Kemal · Jun 24, 2005, 05:30 PM

Why do the X900 Pro and X900XT have lower core speeds than my X800 Pro?

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 05:36 PM

cause they have more pipes...

BWX · Jun 24, 2005, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kemal

Why do the X900 Pro and X900XT have lower core speeds than my X800 Pro?

Same reason the G70 is slower than 6800ultra..

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 06:40 PM

BWX, so the R520 will be slower than X800pro? hehe..

EfrainMan · Jun 24, 2005, 06:42 PM

That there X900 reminds me tad of the ol' X800XT

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 06:51 PM

Do ppl here know about pipes n shaders? And clocks and their relation to fillrate and pixels per clock?? and more important, ROPs?

by ROPs i mean pipeline performance of:
Pixels/sec
Textures/sec
Z-pixels/sec

EfrainMan · Jun 24, 2005, 07:11 PM

ph34r teh babelfish...

ATI has its Radeon X850 XT PE successor (code name: R520) not yet officially presented, but for promised from 31 May to 4 June 2005 in Taipei taking place Computex, first demo of integrated hardware acceleration for the HP-DVD compression format H.264. In the Grand Hyatt hotel in the proximity of the exhibition sites want the Canadians with Cyberlink the hardware acceleration of highly soluble H.264-Video to demonstrate.

"ATI is transforming the PC video landscape by leading the industry adoption OF Blu ray and hp DVD on the PC. This new innovation builds upon ATI's unrivaled video and display of technologies, "said Rick Bergman, senior Vice President, PC Business unit, ATI Technologies.
The H.264 codec is a better image quality and compression as for instance MPEG-4 to offer and is in the future for the coding of BluRay and Hp DVD videos to be used. Into the HDTV needs dissolutions 1280x720 (720p) and 1920x1080 (1080p) by Apple developed the codec only 8 to 10 Mbps, while the MPEG-2 which is used on DVDs would take compression format up 15 to 20.

Beyond that new rumors emerged over the specifications and models of the Fudo:

Radeon X900 XT-PE
• 32 Pixel-Pipelines
• 10 Vertex-Shader Units
• 90nm low-k with TSMC
• 500 Mhz Chip clock
• 700 MHz (1,4 Ghz) Memory clockt
• 512 MB GDDR-3

Radeon X900 XT
• 32 Pixel-Pipelines
• 10 Vertex-Shader Units
• 90nm low-k with TSMC
• 450 Mhz Chip clock
• 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Memory clock
• 512 MB GDDR-3

Radeon X900 Pro
• 24 Pixel-Pipelines
• 10 Vertex-Shader Units
• 90nm low-k with TSMC
• 450 Mhz Chip clock
• 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Memory clock
• 256/512 MB GDDR-3

Radeon X900
• 16 Pixel-Pipelines
• 8 Vertex-Shader Units
• 110nm low-k with TSMC
• 500 Mhz Chip clock
• 500 MHz (1,0 Ghz) Memory clock
• 256/512 MB GDDR-3

These data seem natural at first sight quite improbably, think one however of the R300 back, then one knows that ATI is good always for or other surprise. ;-)

mike2h · Jun 24, 2005, 07:22 PM

interesting, but does not mean much until they actually release it.

Kemal · Jun 24, 2005, 07:43 PM

"Same reason the G70 is slower than 6800ultra.."

And that reason is? If I knew, i wouldn't have asked.

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 07:56 PM

#12, i think he was being a fanboy

Shadow Lady · Jun 24, 2005, 08:37 PM

no Shader Model words yet, i just want to know if they will skip SM3.0 to the other level

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 08:51 PM

it'll be SM3.0

BWX · Jun 24, 2005, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsdsdk

#12, i think he was being a fanboy

WTF are you talking about?

BWX · Jun 24, 2005, 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kemal

"Same reason the G70 is slower than 6800ultra.."

And that reason is? If I knew, i wouldn't have asked.

Slower clock speed doesn't mean less performance. The gains in performance are from the architecture.

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 09:18 PM

"Same reason the G70 is slower than 6800ultra"

afaik the 7800gtx is faster than the 6800ultra...!?

BWX · Jun 24, 2005, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsdsdk

"Same reason the G70 is slower than 6800ultra"

afaik the 7800gtx is faster than the 6800ultra...!?

Not the clock speed!

dsdsdk · Jun 24, 2005, 09:33 PM

ah you meant clock speed.. prolly why i didnt get ya. Ultra=425 GTX=430

Danhill · Jun 24, 2005, 09:58 PM

Ultra 400/1100
GTX 430/1200

BWX · Jun 25, 2005, 06:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danhill

Ultra 400/1100
GTX 430/1200

Hmm- one of the reviews I was reading said the clockspeed was lower- I have to find that..

Jun 24, 2005, 05:13 PM	#2
riles9262 Driverheaven brewmaster Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: British Columbia, Canada Posts: 4,842 Rep Power: 72 System Specs	If true they look pretty hefty. __________________ A beer a day keeps the doctor away.

Jun 24, 2005, 05:28 PM	#3
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	1400mhz, 1,2ns ram... who makes those?? 1,6ns by samsung, rated at 1250mhz.. hmmm, i'm sKeptic __________________ No more Kitty!

Jun 24, 2005, 05:30 PM	#4
Kemal DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 166 Rep Power: 0	Why do the X900 Pro and X900XT have lower core speeds than my X800 Pro? __________________ ASUS A7N8X Rev 2.0 AMD Athlon XP 3000+ 1gb PC3200 DDR (512mb PC3200x2) + 256mb Radeon X800 Pro Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Windows XP SP 2

Jun 24, 2005, 05:36 PM	#5
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	cause they have more pipes... __________________ No more Kitty!

Jun 24, 2005, 06:40 PM	#7
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	BWX, so the R520 will be slower than X800pro? hehe.. __________________ No more Kitty!

Jun 24, 2005, 04:26 PM	#1
daRk_heLmet Keep firing, assholes! Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Death Star Posts: 1,072 Rep Power: 0	ATi X900 Series Specs ? Radeon X900 XT-PE • 32 Pixel-Pipelines • 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten • 90nm low-k bei TSMC • 500 Mhz Chiptakt • 700 MHz (1,4 Ghz) Speichertakt • 512 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 XT • 32 Pixel-Pipelines • 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten • 90nm low-k bei TSMC • 450 Mhz Chiptakt • 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt • 512 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 Pro • 24 Pixel-Pipelines • 10 Vertex-Shader Einheiten • 90nm low-k bei TSMC • 450 Mhz Chiptakt • 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Speichertakt • 256/512 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 • 16 Pixel-Pipelines • 8 Vertex-Shader Einheiten • 110nm low-k bei TSMC • 500 Mhz Chiptakt • 500 MHz (1,0 Ghz) Speichertakt • 256/512 MB GDDR-3 ______________________ Read More/Source: ATi-News (Sorry, non-English) __________________ [color=white]My Blog[/color]

Jun 24, 2005, 06:42 PM	#8
EfrainMan HardwareHeaven Lover Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 199 Rep Power: 50 System Specs	That there X900 reminds me tad of the ol' X800XT __________________ My modest video card history: S3 Virge, 3DLabs Permedia 2, 3dfx Voodoo3 2000, 3dfx Voodoo5 5500, GeForce 3 Ti500, GeForce 4 Ti4600, Radeon 9700 Pro, Radeon X800XT, Radeon X1900XT+Crossfire, GeForce 8800GTX, Radeon HD4870x2, Radeon HD5870, 2x Radeon HD6970, GeForce GTX 680

Jun 24, 2005, 06:51 PM	#9
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	Do ppl here know about pipes n shaders? And clocks and their relation to fillrate and pixels per clock?? and more important, ROPs? by ROPs i mean pipeline performance of: Pixels/sec Textures/sec Z-pixels/sec __________________ No more Kitty!

Jun 24, 2005, 07:11 PM	#10
EfrainMan HardwareHeaven Lover Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 199 Rep Power: 50 System Specs	ph34r teh babelfish... ATI has its Radeon X850 XT PE successor (code name: R520) not yet officially presented, but for promised from 31 May to 4 June 2005 in Taipei taking place Computex, first demo of integrated hardware acceleration for the HP-DVD compression format H.264. In the Grand Hyatt hotel in the proximity of the exhibition sites want the Canadians with Cyberlink the hardware acceleration of highly soluble H.264-Video to demonstrate. "ATI is transforming the PC video landscape by leading the industry adoption OF Blu ray and hp DVD on the PC. This new innovation builds upon ATI's unrivaled video and display of technologies, "said Rick Bergman, senior Vice President, PC Business unit, ATI Technologies. The H.264 codec is a better image quality and compression as for instance MPEG-4 to offer and is in the future for the coding of BluRay and Hp DVD videos to be used. Into the HDTV needs dissolutions 1280x720 (720p) and 1920x1080 (1080p) by Apple developed the codec only 8 to 10 Mbps, while the MPEG-2 which is used on DVDs would take compression format up 15 to 20. Beyond that new rumors emerged over the specifications and models of the Fudo: Radeon X900 XT-PE • 32 Pixel-Pipelines • 10 Vertex-Shader Units • 90nm low-k with TSMC • 500 Mhz Chip clock • 700 MHz (1,4 Ghz) Memory clockt • 512 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 XT • 32 Pixel-Pipelines • 10 Vertex-Shader Units • 90nm low-k with TSMC • 450 Mhz Chip clock • 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Memory clock • 512 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 Pro • 24 Pixel-Pipelines • 10 Vertex-Shader Units • 90nm low-k with TSMC • 450 Mhz Chip clock • 600 MHz (1,2 Ghz) Memory clock • 256/512 MB GDDR-3 Radeon X900 • 16 Pixel-Pipelines • 8 Vertex-Shader Units • 110nm low-k with TSMC • 500 Mhz Chip clock • 500 MHz (1,0 Ghz) Memory clock • 256/512 MB GDDR-3 These data seem natural at first sight quite improbably, think one however of the R300 back, then one knows that ATI is good always for or other surprise. ;-) __________________ My modest video card history: S3 Virge, 3DLabs Permedia 2, 3dfx Voodoo3 2000, 3dfx Voodoo5 5500, GeForce 3 Ti500, GeForce 4 Ti4600, Radeon 9700 Pro, Radeon X800XT, Radeon X1900XT+Crossfire, GeForce 8800GTX, Radeon HD4870x2, Radeon HD5870, 2x Radeon HD6970, GeForce GTX 680

Jun 24, 2005, 07:22 PM	#11
mike2h DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: norcal Posts: 6,483 Rep Power: 91 System Specs	interesting, but does not mean much until they actually release it. __________________

Jun 24, 2005, 07:43 PM	#12
Kemal DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 166 Rep Power: 0	"Same reason the G70 is slower than 6800ultra.." And that reason is? If I knew, i wouldn't have asked. __________________ ASUS A7N8X Rev 2.0 AMD Athlon XP 3000+ 1gb PC3200 DDR (512mb PC3200x2) + 256mb Radeon X800 Pro Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Windows XP SP 2

Jun 24, 2005, 07:56 PM	#13
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	#12, i think he was being a fanboy __________________ No more Kitty!

Jun 24, 2005, 08:37 PM	#14
Shadow Lady Avril Fan Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: somewhere in colombia, okok, bogotÃ¡ city :p Posts: 1,262 Rep Power: 0	no Shader Model words yet, i just want to know if they will skip SM3.0 to the other level __________________ Oblivion ftw

Jun 24, 2005, 08:51 PM	#15
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	it'll be SM3.0 __________________ No more Kitty!

Jun 24, 2005, 09:18 PM	#18
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	"Same reason the G70 is slower than 6800ultra" afaik the 7800gtx is faster than the 6800ultra...!? __________________ No more Kitty!

Jun 24, 2005, 09:58 PM	#21
Danhill DriverHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: May 2003 Location: Sweden Posts: 4,112 Rep Power: 0	Ultra 400/1100 GTX 430/1200 __________________ MOBO: [color=white]ASUS A8N-SLI Premium[/color] CPU: AMD 64 3200+ (Venice) @ 2,50 Ghz MEM: 2 x 512 DDR 466, VGA: 2 x 6600 GT in SLI, HDD1: WD Raptor HDD2: Maxtor Diamond Plus 9, Case: Antec Plus View 1080, PSU: ThermalTake PurePower 500W, MX 1000, Dell 2001 FP, Aud. 2 SZ

Jun 24, 2005, 09:33 PM	#20
dsdsdk DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Denmark, CPH. Posts: 586 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	ah you meant clock speed.. prolly why i didnt get ya. Ultra=425 GTX=430 __________________ No more Kitty!