Intel's 65nm Processors: Overclocking Preview

WxChaser · Oct 27, 2005, 12:05 PM

Between now and the second half of 2006, Intel does have one last card up their sleeves to send NetBurst to its grave with a proper farewell - the migration to Intel's 65nm process. At 65nm, the cores get smaller, the chips get cooler, and the clocks get higher. However, with Intel's next-generation architecture around the corner, Intel won't take their new 65nm chips too far, as they want to avoid a repeat of the Pentium 4's launch, where the new architecture is outperformed by its predecessor. So, despite what Intel's 65nm process may be capable of, the first 65nm Pentium 4s won't offer any increase in clock speeds.

Read More / Source: AnandTech

**dj_stick** · Oct 27, 2005, 12:11 PM

maybe it was a CPU-Z error, but those screens showed the chips were socket 478?

Oct 27, 2005, 12:05 PM	#1
WxChaser Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 404 Rep Power: 0	Intel's 65nm Processors: Overclocking Preview Between now and the second half of 2006, Intel does have one last card up their sleeves to send NetBurst to its grave with a proper farewell - the migration to Intel's 65nm process. At 65nm, the cores get smaller, the chips get cooler, and the clocks get higher. However, with Intel's next-generation architecture around the corner, Intel won't take their new 65nm chips too far, as they want to avoid a repeat of the Pentium 4's launch, where the new architecture is outperformed by its predecessor. So, despite what Intel's 65nm process may be capable of, the first 65nm Pentium 4s won't offer any increase in clock speeds. Read More / Source: AnandTech