|
|||||||
| Overclocking and Modding A haven for all you hardware Gurus who want to push it all to the MAX. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
DriverHeaven Lover
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 197
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Dual core temperatures
I have a dual core cpu, and i get three readings from nxsensor; processor,core A, core B
when overclocking should i consider the processor reading? during encoding these are the results (proc,core A, core B) PC Wizard 2007 : 49,50,55 nextsensor : 40.49,55 coretemeter : --.56.48 #1 : notice that nxsensor, pc wizard readings for both cores are both reversed when compared to coretemeter #2 : proc temp in pc wizard is higher than nxsensor (either way it is lower that both cores) so what reading does the processor correspond to (the processor die?)....and what significance does it have if overclocking ----- another issue is that when idle there is a 10C difference between the two core....can someone explain why this is the case |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Me>You
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Da Hood
Posts: 507
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
As far as what temp to worry about, just pay attention to the core temps, most people follow the rule of thumb of no higher than 55 degrees core temp on X2's give or take, 57 or even 60 on one core won't kill your cpu but its best for longevity to keep them 55ish or under. A good app that I like for monitoring temps is coretemp: Core Temp Its fairly popular and I've ccompared it to Everest Ultimate and it seems to also be pretty accurate or inline with the same temps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
good to read a very good comment and one that does not scare me away like that from you Da_Jewish_Hornet.
i just though i should tell you. as for the op's post, what is your motherboard and processor type? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,794
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Two cores shouldn't be that far apart since they're located directly on the same chip... I'd use Core Temp. I've found it to be a pretty reliable program with minimal system resource impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
USB 3 dot oh
|
Quote:
Could be that far apart due to a number of things.... improper TIM application, uneven pressure across the IHS and heatsink base due to concave,convex surfaces on either IHS or base, or a misread by a faulty program. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,794
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Yeah but 10 degrees? It hardly seems likely even if all that is true (except faulty program)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
USB 3 dot oh
|
Quote:
Its very possible actually Most quadcores average 5C difference across all 4 cores. 2-3 might be the same then 1 other is 5C higher or vice versa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Cthulhu/Dagon 2012
|
The sensors themselves aren't too accurate. There can be a large difference between the readout from the two cores simply because the sensors in each CPU deviate more or less in either direction from the actual temperature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
what about TAT, the Intel Thermal Analasys Tool? whatever happened to that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Howlin at the moon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,663
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My Quadcore seem to run within 1-2C difference across the cores at 100% load, though when I initially put it together I was getting upto 6c variation as the thermal paste hadnt spread very well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
USB 3 dot oh
|
Thats a warm little B3 you got there
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Howlin at the moon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,663
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Heh weathers pretty warm here at the moment and it's at 1.35v, never tops 60c though so plenty of playing room left. Oh and that AS5 was applied fresh that day so hasn't really bedded in. I'll give it a couple of weeks and bump it to 1.4v and 3ghz. Dont forget I got two 8800GTS cards in their and a stupid Asus chipset system which gets so hot I can't touch it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
nah i think the processor temps looks pretty okay to me, specially considering the system was in a warm environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Howlin at the moon
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,663
Rep Power: 0 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What a difference a few days of stress testing and burning in can make. Room temps still similar but im now idling at 36-37C. One degree difference on core1 is NWN2 updating. On top of that I have 3 messenger windows and 4 websites on the taskbar so it's not strictly idling.
Just goes to show that correctly applying thermal paste can make all the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
actually, the temperature looks pretty good. ![]() and i think 1-2 and up to 5 degrees celsius different between or among each core during system "idling" should not be much concerned to user. however, when the system processor in "full load", the difference between each CPU core's should not be, at all time, more than 2°C. and besides the CPU cooler, computer case air flow, (and just you might add the thermal compound to this), as you can notice, the room temps can/will make the big different on the system's and processor's temps. different room temps, different system temps.
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|