GF2

Shaunboyland · Jul 17, 2002, 06:39 PM

I over clock my old GF2 today, got a 200point jump on 3dmark 2001 SE.
Can't wait till i get my Radeon 8500 128mb card in a few weeks

~~shai~~ · Jul 17, 2002, 09:46 PM

a gts i suppose
anyway whats the clock now you might be able to overclock more

Shaunboyland · Jul 18, 2002, 02:05 PM

nope was a MX/400, was clocked at 175Mhz now at 220mhz, memory was clocked at 166 now its at 210

Matth · Jul 19, 2002, 06:12 AM

Good scores!

If it was 175 / 166 to begin with, that's an original MX
The MX400 is clocked at 200 / 166 (or 200 / 175 )
128 bit SDRAM, or 64 bit DDR - so DDR performance is actually the same or lower than SDRAM

The MX200 is 175 / 166 with 64 bit SDRAM only (crippled memory bandwidth!)
Slower RAM may be seen, or faster by some makers.

It's often said that the difference between the MX and the MX400 is only the heatsink to handle the extra dissipation - I must fit one to mine!

digitalwanderer · Jul 19, 2002, 07:25 AM

My Silura 64MB GF2 MX400 (to be retired next week

) broke 3K for me clocked at 240/210.

(Yes, I just had to get the MX400 pimping in, the card has been great to me.

)

Jul 17, 2002, 06:39 PM	#1
Shaunboyland DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Oak Ridge, NC Posts: 168 Rep Power: 0	GF2 I over clock my old GF2 today, got a 200point jump on 3dmark 2001 SE. Can't wait till i get my Radeon 8500 128mb card in a few weeks __________________

Jul 18, 2002, 02:05 PM	Thread Starter #3
Shaunboyland DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Oak Ridge, NC Posts: 168 Rep Power: 0	nope was a MX/400, was clocked at 175Mhz now at 220mhz, memory was clocked at 166 now its at 210 __________________

Jul 19, 2002, 06:12 AM	#4
Matth Flash Banner Hater Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: UK Posts: 3,426 Rep Power: 93 System Specs	Good scores! If it was 175 / 166 to begin with, that's an original MX The MX400 is clocked at 200 / 166 (or 200 / 175 ) 128 bit SDRAM, or 64 bit DDR - so DDR performance is actually the same or lower than SDRAM The MX200 is 175 / 166 with 64 bit SDRAM only (crippled memory bandwidth!) Slower RAM may be seen, or faster by some makers. It's often said that the difference between the MX and the MX400 is only the heatsink to handle the extra dissipation - I must fit one to mine! __________________ Mary had a little lamb, Her father shot it dead Now Mary takes her lamb to school, Between two crusts of bread

Jul 19, 2002, 07:25 AM	#5
digitalwanderer Colour Commentator Join Date: May 2002 Location: Highland, IN USA Posts: 5,619 Rep Power: 0	MX400s ROCK! My Silura 64MB GF2 MX400 (to be retired next week ) broke 3K for me clocked at 240/210. (Yes, I just had to get the MX400 pimping in, the card has been great to me. ) __________________ WTF is up with the sigs?

Jul 17, 2002, 09:46 PM	#2
~~shai~~ Banned Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 613 Rep Power: 0	a gts i suppose anyway whats the clock now you might be able to overclock more