radlinker or atitool to OC??

armen87 · Aug 21, 2004, 12:48 AM

which one do u prefere to OC ati graphic cards??with my graphic card (9800) which one is the most suitable?? is one of them safer than the othe one¿¿??

Drakon · Aug 21, 2004, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by armen87

which one do u prefere to OC ati graphic cards??with my graphic card (9800) which one is the most suitable?? is one of them safer than the othe one¿¿??

well i use a combo of both. i use atitool to oc my card to it's max core and memory speeds and i use radlinker to set them as the new "default" speeds whenever the computer starts up... not sure if u can do that with atitool...

SIK_L_CELL · Aug 21, 2004, 02:59 AM

I have hed better results with Radlinker. Just my .02

drakesteakn · Aug 21, 2004, 03:08 AM

i use radlinker, but i have atitool too.

OxfordDon · Aug 21, 2004, 03:15 AM

I use atitool to find the max overclock, then use radlinker to overclock and when I start up games, works beautifully.

SIK_L_CELL · Aug 21, 2004, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OxfordDon

I use atitool to find the max overclock, then use radlinker to overclock and when I start up games, works beautifully.

I prefer to find my own max OC. Atitool sometimes falls short.

CrapolaJola · Aug 21, 2004, 09:01 PM

I prefer Radlinker simply, because it OCs and it does a lot more. Well that and the fact that when I first tried ATI tool it found my max speeds quite a bit lower than was really possible without artifacting.

Aug 21, 2004, 12:48 AM	#1
armen87 DriverHeaven Newbie Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 18 Rep Power: 0	radlinker or atitool to OC?? which one do u prefere to OC ati graphic cards??with my graphic card (9800) which one is the most suitable?? is one of them safer than the othe one¿¿?? __________________ Pentium 4 3.0GHz[HT] 800MHz 1GB DDRAM 400Mhz Ati RADEON9800 128MB 324MHz/290MHz Seagate 120GB HDD SATA Maxtor 80GB HDD ATA/133 DVD+RW NEC ND-3500AG Creative Sound Blaster Live! 2.1 Harman/Kardon

Aug 21, 2004, 02:59 AM	#3
SIK_L_CELL Cowboy From Hell Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: USA Posts: 225 Rep Power: 0	I have hed better results with Radlinker. Just my .02 __________________ FX-55 X850xt DFI SLI-DR Gskill LE 05 - 8152 03 - 17169 01 - 38020 AM3 - 102443

Aug 21, 2004, 03:08 AM	#4
drakesteakn boo!!!! Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Ft. Meyers, FL Posts: 2,041 Rep Power: 0	i use radlinker, but i have atitool too. __________________

Aug 21, 2004, 03:15 AM	#5
OxfordDon DriverHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 43 Rep Power: 0	I use atitool to find the max overclock, then use radlinker to overclock and when I start up games, works beautifully. __________________ [color=blue]Asus A8N-SLi Deluxe nForce4 SLi Motherboard[/color] [color=blue]2 x GeForce 7800GTX[/color] [color=blue]AMD Athlon 64 FX-55[/color] [color=blue]Audigy 2 ZS[/color] [color=blue]OCZ PC-3200 Dual Channel Platinum Revision 2 1024MB[/color] [color=blue]2 x Western Digital Raptor 74GB (RAID 0)[/color] [color=blue]Seagate 7200.8 300GB SATA 8MB Cache[/color] [color=blue]Windows XP Pro[/color]

Aug 21, 2004, 09:01 PM	#7
CrapolaJola The Great DaK Join Date: Jan 2004 Posts: 317 Rep Power: 0	I prefer Radlinker simply, because it OCs and it does a lot more. Well that and the fact that when I first tried ATI tool it found my max speeds quite a bit lower than was really possible without artifacting. __________________ P2 X4 @ 3.6ghz, 4gb ddr3, SSD, 5870 @ 950/1250 + a 3ghz i5 lappy