After Iraq who`s next?

Talicni_Tom · Mar 21, 2003, 04:17 PM

let me guess:North Korea,Cuba or France maybe?

Or the americans might finally bomb somebody of their own size like last big communist country China

raid517 · Mar 21, 2003, 06:10 PM

Hopefully nobody. Its always best to look for a peaceful solution first.

Q

Smoothdrive · Mar 21, 2003, 08:03 PM

Ground control to Major (Talicni) Tom..please stop spacing out and get back to earth...

Otherwise put..what are you trying to say or ask in this thread ?

If your question is like it is..well than the answer is no-one

~~bluelight~~ · Mar 21, 2003, 09:21 PM

Well the question is relevant since they have claimed they will continue on this path in one way or another.

Preemptive strikes is part of this governments declaration on how they will rule Usa.

So yes the question is relevant.

Bluelight

Falstaff · Mar 21, 2003, 11:39 PM

Yes, North Korea......

~~ByteMe~~ · Mar 21, 2003, 11:41 PM

Has to be North Korea... then maybe Iran, France would down to number 5-6 on the list.

raid517 · Mar 22, 2003, 12:34 AM

Well I don't know. You ask dumb questions and look at the company you attract. I think the question is stupid and gleeful as it revels in the prospect and reality of war. War should always be avoided and when this isn't possible it certainly shouldn't be enjoyed.

On a side note I saw some shots of a young American artiliery soldier writing messages on his shells. One of the messages read "Saddam, remember 9/11". I'm sorry but this sort of thing disturbs me. Is it just me, or can anyone else here spot the error? Are troops really told that Saddam was responsible for/involved in 9/11. Or is this just some ignorant young kid who didn't know any better?

Q

BWX · Mar 22, 2003, 12:40 AM

I predict it will be N. Korea, that is the biggest threat.

Crazy dictator with NUKES = Threat.

Falstaff · Mar 22, 2003, 12:46 AM

I'm just telling you, it's been a long time coming....reunification of Korea, whether it takes a war or not....

raid517 · Mar 22, 2003, 01:31 AM

I wasn't referring to you Jeff. You know who I meant...

Anyway, I still think the original question was dumb, as it make war sound like its all fun and games.

I hope it isn't Korea next, because if it is it will almost certainly mean nukes. I'm not sure who is potentially more crazy, but if either the Korean leader or Bush uses nukes, both will go down in history as mad men.

I posted links before to Bush's strategic defence review where he clearly reserved the right to launch a nuclear first stike against unfriendly countries, so I wouldn't discount the possibility of the US using nukes first.

The only problem at the moment is that they are just a little preoccupied...

Q

Highwood · Mar 22, 2003, 03:55 AM

Please Bomb the hell out of the parliament buildings in Ottawa Canada and free the oppressed people of western Canada from Jack Ass Jean and his band of thieving thugs.

toddsmack2k · Mar 22, 2003, 05:44 AM

I think we will go after N. Korea next. Not with war though(hopefully) but with negotiations

edperks · Mar 22, 2003, 06:05 AM

We all need to reflect about Korea:

LEST WE FORGET"
They shall grow not old
As we that are left grow old
Age shall not weary them
Nor the years condemn
At the going down of the Sun,
And in the morning,
We will remember them.

From Captain David Weltman, Veteran of WWII, Korea and Vietnam
"This quote is the Theme of "LEST WE FORGET". It comes from the First World War days.. It is generally recited out loud whenever War Veterans' meet at Funerals and at other dedicated occasions. We end it with Amen."

Falstaff · Mar 22, 2003, 06:08 AM

The wheels have been set in motion, to attempt to polarize international opinion against the N. Koreans retaining possesion of fissionalbe weapons grade plutonium, but sources within the the Pentagon, (depending on who you believe) think that N. Korea has the capability to deploy WMD within striking distance of Japan and american bases there..

BWX · Mar 22, 2003, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Highwood
Please Bomb the hell out of the parliament buildings in Ottawa Canada and free the oppressed people of western Canada from.

Who is Jack Ass Jean and his band of thieving thugs?

Smoothdrive · Mar 24, 2003, 10:34 AM

It is key that the coalition does a good job in Iraq, get Saddam out of there, organise a democratic system for the country, get free elections, help them build a free, save and prosperous country..

Only than will the war have been worth it, will the US and UK regain some of it's status of actually fighting wars trying to help make the world a better place and will a next war be far far away.

Falstaff · Mar 24, 2003, 12:15 PM

believe that us, until the american forces, after a victiorious restoration of power, back into the hands of the people...will the celebrations begin...but I wonder how we would feel, if the IRAQI people elect someone that was a member of the BATHIST party, and equally as corrupt...this is so complicated, and I wish restoring restoring dignity to the forces fighting now were an issue, but it isn't yet....the U.S. and the U.K. are kicking some serious butt, and we really haven't suffered yet...not yet...

merry · Mar 24, 2003, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BWX232
Who is Jack Ass Jean and his band of thieving thugs?

Why, you have a spare nuke?

I think he meant Jean Chretien.

Reuter · Mar 25, 2003, 08:51 PM

If this mad policy continues I only hope he will take on France next because the US will be flattened as well then and all will come to an end.
Why not end it all at once ?

What I mean to say is : stop your mad president before it's to late

BWX · Mar 26, 2003, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Reuter
If this mad policy continues I only hope he will take on France next because the US will be flattened as well then and all will come to an end.
Why not end it all at once ?

What I mean to say is : stop your mad president before it's to late

WTF?
who is gonna flatten the US? Even if we did attack someone like France-even though the notion is ridiculous.

Falstaff · Mar 26, 2003, 05:54 AM

This can't be a serious debate about anything if we start throwing nukes around, mad presidents or not, nuclear alternatives are terribly self limiting...

Smoothdrive · Mar 26, 2003, 07:58 AM

Just wait till Iraq is conquered..the US will find some interesting documents in Bagdad on mr Chiraq and his relation with Saddam..no wonder France was against this war.

Falstaff · Mar 26, 2003, 08:02 AM

you are so close my frirend, so terribly close...imagine a dictater that allows the French to build a nuclear reacter secretly in the desert.........keep watching the news....it was the french or someone else....

BWX · Mar 26, 2003, 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by fallang_jeff
you are so close my frirend, so terribly close...imagine a dictater that allows the French to build a nuclear reacter secretly in the desert.........keep watching the news....it was the french or someone else....

Russia maybe?

Vampyromaniac · Mar 26, 2003, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Smoothdrive
Just wait till Iraq is conquered..the US will find some interesting documents in Bagdad on mr Chiraq and his relation with Saddam..

To find documents, wouldn't they have to leave some buildings standing? I don't know why they seem to be bombing everything

BWX · Mar 26, 2003, 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Vampyromaniac
To find documents, wouldn't they have to leave some buildings standing? I don't know why they seem to be bombing everything

LOL, I bet they will "find" something no matter what -wink, wink-

Smoothdrive · Mar 26, 2003, 11:57 AM

Saddam has 2 bunkers (1 in Bagdad and 1 outside of Bagdad) that were build by the (at that time friends of Saddam) Yugoslaves which lay about 250 Meters below ground..don't know what bomb you're trying to use but no way you'll hit those bunkers...

~~bluelight~~ · Mar 26, 2003, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Smoothdrive
Just wait till Iraq is conquered..the US will find some interesting documents in Bagdad on mr Chiraq and his relation with Saddam..no wonder France was against this war.

Now you just watch it!! Or ill sort MR Don from his little box again!!

Bluelight

~~bluelight~~ · Mar 26, 2003, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by fallang_jeff
you are so close my frirend, so terribly close...imagine a dictater that allows the French to build a nuclear reacter secretly in the desert.........keep watching the news....it was the french or someone else....

Yes it was the French that helped him build a nuclear plant.This is not news.They did this at the same time as you were looking the other way when The Green guy gased kurds.

They did this as a consequent politics that they shared with you......in supporting Saddam.You supported him with weapoas and intelligence(telling him where tio find Iranians that he then could attack with nervagas)...they built a nuclear plant to produce electrics.

Since you both thought you controlled him...you had no problems with this.

Then of course...the Israelis got worried...first ..of all...and bombed the thing.Wich of course was well enough..but as i remember it...it wasnt very appreciated they did that in Usa either.

The France whining...... is extremely tireing...extremely...

Mr Don....where are you...come and telll us...about it!!Tell us what it was really about!

Bluelight

Falstaff · Mar 26, 2003, 02:45 PM

what they appear to be, it gets worse...I cannot confirm nor deny the prescence of a potentiol nuclear threat in IRAQ, but the U.S. will be looking for it, why else would Saddam want to take low grade uranium from Russia and turn it into fissionable material...it's scary..and this was more than twelve years ago man..

Mar 21, 2003, 04:17 PM	#1
Talicni_Tom DriverHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 41 Rep Power: 0	After Iraq who`s next? let me guess:North Korea,Cuba or France maybe? Or the americans might finally bomb somebody of their own size like last big communist country China __________________ p4 2.4b abit be7 768MB ati radeon 8500 128MB

Mar 21, 2003, 08:03 PM	#3
Smoothdrive Foolish Genius Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 455 Rep Power: 0	Ground control to Major (Talicni) Tom..please stop spacing out and get back to earth... Otherwise put..what are you trying to say or ask in this thread ? If your question is like it is..well than the answer is no-one __________________ GA-7VRXP, AMD2000+, 256MB PC-2700 DDR, Radeon 8500LE, 2x Maxtor 740 (40GB) stripe set, AGNeovo X-150.

Mar 21, 2003, 11:39 PM	#5
Falstaff Old Codger Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: USAFA Posts: 19,048 Rep Power: 207	Based on my limited info Yes, North Korea...... __________________ "Inspiration is always a surprising visitor."

Mar 22, 2003, 12:40 AM	#8
BWX unplugged Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: USNY Posts: 19,669 Rep Power: 110 System Specs	I predict it will be N. Korea, that is the biggest threat. Crazy dictator with NUKES = Threat. __________________

Mar 22, 2003, 12:46 AM	#9
Falstaff Old Codger Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: USAFA Posts: 19,048 Rep Power: 207	N. Korea man I'm just telling you, it's been a long time coming....reunification of Korea, whether it takes a war or not.... __________________ "Inspiration is always a surprising visitor."

Mar 21, 2003, 06:10 PM	#2
raid517 DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,518 Rep Power: 0	Hopefully nobody. Its always best to look for a peaceful solution first. Q

Mar 21, 2003, 09:21 PM	#4
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	Well the question is relevant since they have claimed they will continue on this path in one way or another. Preemptive strikes is part of this governments declaration on how they will rule Usa. So yes the question is relevant. Bluelight

Mar 21, 2003, 11:41 PM	#6
~~ByteMe~~ Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 761 Rep Power: 0	Has to be North Korea... then maybe Iran, France would down to number 5-6 on the list.

Mar 22, 2003, 12:34 AM	#7
raid517 DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,518 Rep Power: 0	Well I don't know. You ask dumb questions and look at the company you attract. I think the question is stupid and gleeful as it revels in the prospect and reality of war. War should always be avoided and when this isn't possible it certainly shouldn't be enjoyed. On a side note I saw some shots of a young American artiliery soldier writing messages on his shells. One of the messages read "Saddam, remember 9/11". I'm sorry but this sort of thing disturbs me. Is it just me, or can anyone else here spot the error? Are troops really told that Saddam was responsible for/involved in 9/11. Or is this just some ignorant young kid who didn't know any better? Q

Mar 22, 2003, 01:31 AM	#10
raid517 DriverHeaven Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 2,518 Rep Power: 0	I wasn't referring to you Jeff. You know who I meant... Anyway, I still think the original question was dumb, as it make war sound like its all fun and games. I hope it isn't Korea next, because if it is it will almost certainly mean nukes. I'm not sure who is potentially more crazy, but if either the Korean leader or Bush uses nukes, both will go down in history as mad men. I posted links before to Bush's strategic defence review where he clearly reserved the right to launch a nuclear first stike against unfriendly countries, so I wouldn't discount the possibility of the US using nukes first. The only problem at the moment is that they are just a little preoccupied... Q

Mar 22, 2003, 03:55 AM	#11
Highwood Comfortably Numb Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Calgary Alberta Canada Posts: 504 Rep Power: 0	Please Bomb the hell out of the parliament buildings in Ottawa Canada and free the oppressed people of western Canada from Jack Ass Jean and his band of thieving thugs.

Mar 22, 2003, 05:44 AM	#12
toddsmack2k It Never..... Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Kentucky Posts: 3,173 Rep Power: 0	I think we will go after N. Korea next. Not with war though(hopefully) but with negotiations __________________ [color=blue]*Bleeding From the Inside Pouring Out, The* *DriverHeaven* Spiral, We Shall Never Let Go Of.[/color]

Mar 22, 2003, 06:05 AM	#13
edperks HardwareHeaven Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: Southern Illinois Posts: 780 Rep Power: 0 System Specs	We all need to reflect about Korea: LEST WE FORGET" They shall grow not old As we that are left grow old Age shall not weary them Nor the years condemn At the going down of the Sun, And in the morning, We will remember them. From Captain David Weltman, Veteran of WWII, Korea and Vietnam "This quote is the Theme of "LEST WE FORGET". It comes from the First World War days.. It is generally recited out loud whenever War Veterans' meet at Funerals and at other dedicated occasions. We end it with Amen."

Mar 22, 2003, 06:08 AM	#14
Falstaff Old Codger Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: USAFA Posts: 19,048 Rep Power: 207	Preoccupation The wheels have been set in motion, to attempt to polarize international opinion against the N. Koreans retaining possesion of fissionalbe weapons grade plutonium, but sources within the the Pentagon, (depending on who you believe) think that N. Korea has the capability to deploy WMD within striking distance of Japan and american bases there.. __________________ "Inspiration is always a surprising visitor."

Mar 24, 2003, 10:34 AM	#16
Smoothdrive Foolish Genius Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 455 Rep Power: 0	It is key that the coalition does a good job in Iraq, get Saddam out of there, organise a democratic system for the country, get free elections, help them build a free, save and prosperous country.. Only than will the war have been worth it, will the US and UK regain some of it's status of actually fighting wars trying to help make the world a better place and will a next war be far far away. __________________ GA-7VRXP, AMD2000+, 256MB PC-2700 DDR, Radeon 8500LE, 2x Maxtor 740 (40GB) stripe set, AGNeovo X-150.

Mar 24, 2003, 12:15 PM	#17
Falstaff Old Codger Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: USAFA Posts: 19,048 Rep Power: 207	And no one will believe that us, until the american forces, after a victiorious restoration of power, back into the hands of the people...will the celebrations begin...but I wonder how we would feel, if the IRAQI people elect someone that was a member of the BATHIST party, and equally as corrupt...this is so complicated, and I wish restoring restoring dignity to the forces fighting now were an issue, but it isn't yet....the U.S. and the U.K. are kicking some serious butt, and we really haven't suffered yet...not yet... __________________ "Inspiration is always a surprising visitor."

Mar 25, 2003, 08:51 PM	#19
Reuter DriverHeaven Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Belgium, three feet from my monitor Posts: 55 Rep Power: 0	If this mad policy continues I only hope he will take on France next because the US will be flattened as well then and all will come to an end. Why not end it all at once ? What I mean to say is : stop your mad president before it's to late

Mar 26, 2003, 05:54 AM	#21
Falstaff Old Codger Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: USAFA Posts: 19,048 Rep Power: 207	Nuke this nuke that This can't be a serious debate about anything if we start throwing nukes around, mad presidents or not, nuclear alternatives are terribly self limiting... __________________ "Inspiration is always a surprising visitor."

Mar 26, 2003, 07:58 AM	#22
Smoothdrive Foolish Genius Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 455 Rep Power: 0	Just wait till Iraq is conquered..the US will find some interesting documents in Bagdad on mr Chiraq and his relation with Saddam..no wonder France was against this war. __________________ GA-7VRXP, AMD2000+, 256MB PC-2700 DDR, Radeon 8500LE, 2x Maxtor 740 (40GB) stripe set, AGNeovo X-150.

Mar 26, 2003, 08:02 AM	#23
Falstaff Old Codger Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: USAFA Posts: 19,048 Rep Power: 207	OOOOOOOH MAN you are so close my frirend, so terribly close...imagine a dictater that allows the French to build a nuclear reacter secretly in the desert.........keep watching the news....it was the french or someone else.... __________________ "Inspiration is always a surprising visitor."

Mar 26, 2003, 11:57 AM	#27
Smoothdrive Foolish Genius Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 455 Rep Power: 0	Saddam has 2 bunkers (1 in Bagdad and 1 outside of Bagdad) that were build by the (at that time friends of Saddam) Yugoslaves which lay about 250 Meters below ground..don't know what bomb you're trying to use but no way you'll hit those bunkers... __________________ GA-7VRXP, AMD2000+, 256MB PC-2700 DDR, Radeon 8500LE, 2x Maxtor 740 (40GB) stripe set, AGNeovo X-150.

Mar 26, 2003, 02:45 PM	#30
Falstaff Old Codger Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: USAFA Posts: 19,048 Rep Power: 207	Things are not what they appear to be, it gets worse...I cannot confirm nor deny the prescence of a potentiol nuclear threat in IRAQ, but the U.S. will be looking for it, why else would Saddam want to take low grade uranium from Russia and turn it into fissionable material...it's scary..and this was more than twelve years ago man.. __________________ "Inspiration is always a surprising visitor."