|
|||||||
| Political and Religious Debate Political, economic, and religious debate. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
S.N.A.F.U.
|
Explain me this...
Why do the big corporations fire people because they didn't make as much of a profit this year then the last.
When they make a 200mln profit this year, compared to a 300mln profit last year, it is seen as a loss, and people have to be fired to make up for it. Isn't that twisted business? Can someone explain it to me?!
__________________
If one does not attach himself to people and desire, never shall his heart be broken. But then, does he ever truly live? Life is just too damn short for if's and maybe's |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Explain me this...
Legal obligation to their investors to make a profit.
Not saying it's right, but that's why
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
939 Goin Strong
|
Re: Explain me this...
yep, basically.
Stocks go down, people get fired. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
Re: Explain me this...
it's referred to as "good business" which is just retarded
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N.A.F.U.
|
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
__________________
If one does not attach himself to people and desire, never shall his heart be broken. But then, does he ever truly live? Life is just too damn short for if's and maybe's |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
Re: Explain me this...
you just answered your question right here. this is reinforced by Tyrsonswood's earlier statement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N.A.F.U.
|
Re: Explain me this...
but isn't it inevitable to hit a wall? A point where you just can't make any more money than before?
__________________
If one does not attach himself to people and desire, never shall his heart be broken. But then, does he ever truly live? Life is just too damn short for if's and maybe's |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
Re: Explain me this...
with capitalism, you find a way to make more money....like, letting people go to save the company money, therefore, increasing profits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N.A.F.U.
|
Re: Explain me this...
It's a sad world..
__________________
If one does not attach himself to people and desire, never shall his heart be broken. But then, does he ever truly live? Life is just too damn short for if's and maybe's |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
Re: Explain me this...
it is, but it's a way of life in capatalistic societies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Relapsed Gamer
|
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
To me, consistently high profits should be good enough
__________________
E Penis Specs:
<------------- See System Specs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Re: Explain me this...
Legal obligation to maximize profits.
__________________
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.N.A.F.U.
|
Re: Explain me this...
I just can't wrap my head around it. Like Omega said, If I made a profit every year, no matter how big, I would be a happy business man.
(But probably a bad one.. )
__________________
If one does not attach himself to people and desire, never shall his heart be broken. But then, does he ever truly live? Life is just too damn short for if's and maybe's |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Explain me this...
Regardless of whether you believe that Zeitgeist guy (a lot of people are shrugging him off as a conspiracy theorist). Fact is he raised some important questions one that he stated is that governments make laws to protect the interests of large cooperation's. Profit over people is a wrong and disgusting culture and mindset.
What i don't like is when people raise the question of ; isn't there something better than capitalism they shout: "communist! you would rather have share and give away our stuff that we worked for" I reply: no, we need something better than what we have don't we?
__________________
Today's world is of public opinion and the fates of nations are determined through its pressure. Once the tools for building public opinion are obtained, everything that you asked for can be done. --- Osama bin Laden when relating how global media has the minds of the masses. ______________________________________ http://dawgxdenta.deviantart.com/gallery/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
Me? I'd say we needed something better a long, long time ago.......
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
this is precisely why it is enevitable for it to fail because if inflation doesn't go up.... there is no way to perceive to be making more money.... however if it goes up.. It's a catch 22... at some point there cannot be any sum of money that would satisfy anyone company under this ideal. it cannot be done...... even with marginal population increase.... the funds aren't available.. and in printing more.... it just makes it worse.... it can't work..... the system gets beyond the realms of being to patch worked together for it to continue on. To many people... to many companies.... everyone trying for the same thing.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Not all fairies are nice.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 989
Rep Power: 44 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Explain me this...
Several things here.
To the OP - it all depends on LOTS of factors. Which industry you are in, what the terms were for the big CEO's type when they sign on, what else is going on in the rest of the economy & specific segment of the market the business is in. What the board of the company is trying to do. The variables that affect it are endless. It's not always about making more money than last year. Sometimes a company wants to grow in size so it invests in itself - maybe instead of claiming profits they build a new plant. Maybe instead of sending a huge dividend they double manpower to increase production. Again the list of variables in vast & all highly dependent upon what the business is actually doing. I will say this. I don't think you are going to find many examples where the "get er done" workers are going to be fired because a company has 2/3 the BOTTOM LINE profits this year over what it did last year. If the ceo has a contract that says he's out the door unless he increases that bottom line then maybe the CEO is gone but you won't see many of those either. Usually it just means that CEO won't see a bonus or raise. Normally a busines won't cut back unless they have lost money, or are expecting to. Many companies have a plan that almost demands them to have large profits to pay for future expenses. Again it starts getting complicated because you can measure "profits" in any number of ways. It's really something you'd have to look at on a case by case basis. dawg - I agree Capitalism isn't perfect. But then no system devised by man ever will be. Until you can show me something better, I say capitalism is the best we've come up with so far. The biggest problem the US has right now is that we've spent the last 60 years or so creating lifetime politicians, a large dependant segment of the populous, and the whole system has grown so large, cumbersome & complex that the average person doesn't even come close to understanding it & so they are removed from the process. The average person just votes with the guy that has a "D" or an "R" next to their name because the average person imagines that their party is doing things in the manner that is best for the average person. Which is of course BS the average politician is corrupt, isn't doing much of anything except trying to bring home as much money as they can and get themselves re-elected. Damn the country in the process. Profit over people isn't the best concept in the world. People over profit isn't the right one either. You can't have one with out the other. There needs to be a balance. I think capitalism with some minor governmental rules put in place (to prevent child labor & descrimination things of that nature) is the best way to go. The current problem is that government has gotten WAY to involved in business. Tyrson - I say we have what we need, it's just that it isn't being done the way it was originally invisioned. Everyone of our Founding Fathers has been doing backflips in their grave for decades. Fed gov has become soooo powerful & invasive it's not even funny.
__________________
Stupidity should be painful if not terminal. Darwin for Sainthood!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
And this is a problem, a very serious problem that we have in this world. Greed............ Nobody needs to have massive amounts of anything when there are still people that have nothing....... Really! ![]() I mean, you guys realise that 5% of the population of the planet own 95% of it's wealth...... you guys do know that right? Do you agree with that? Or do you think it's a problem?
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
|
Re: Explain me this...
Not much we can do about that tbh. That 5% will keep getting richer and make sure it stays that exclusive. Even if there was a global finacial crash, the cycle would all begin again. Look at all the billionaires in russia, and all after the USSR went tits up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
for example, one who is poor and doesn't have much or anything at all won't care what happens to them when they have done something utterly destructive to one who has "everything money can buy." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Explain me this...
Money can't buy everything
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
Re: Explain me this...
true, but i didn't say money could buy everything. i said "everything money can buy"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Explain me this...
Wasn't sayimg anything against your statement CD's.... just placing a comment of my own.
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
Re: Explain me this...
ahh, sorry for the misunderstanding then
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,275
Rep Power: 89 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Explain me this...
It didn't used to be this way. It used to be that just making ANY profit was good enough. But if you do not show an upward trend on profits, you don't get the huge bonuses (the execs). Unless you work for AIG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,275
Rep Power: 89 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Re: Explain me this...
Quote:
I'm not saying we should try to keep some countries "down" but I am saying that the Earth could not sustain the population that we currently have if we all drove cars. It's already straining because of China and India. We simply have too many people. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
Re: Explain me this...
the rich outlive their means..... the poor under.
The US Budget for millitary spending alone would be more then enough to feed the poor/starving several times over..... even provide shelter and clean water.... (that's just an example) The resources are there.... proper use of it isn't being done, and this isn't due to the average joe blow in any country.... this is due to the profiteers of the big businesses. It's bad enough Nestle is sucking the fresh water wells dry in one state let alone other companies doing the same thing around the world which just makes the businesses richer.... and employs only the rich which makes the people that were able to get relatively clean water eat mud and die even faster. take a gander and watch this FLOW for love of water
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
HH's curmudgeon
|
Re: Explain me this...
I agree, Iria, we do have too many people, more coming everyday. Also a finite amount of resources that we are burning through as if they were infinite mostly so that upper 5% get's to have more $$$$
Like trees for paper. oil dependence, cutting the rainforest for factory farming, etc. We have ways to replace these things now or do them differently now, the technology is there, but "their" investments are all in the stuff we are distroying so we have to stay on that path.... or "they" might lose a buck....... Oil dependence is a blatant example of this, but there's many others. Besides the thought process that uses people as a "resource" ....... In a way that is an almost "infinite" supply, but to use people up and throw them away, to fire them so investors get a bigger cut???? That ain't right.....
__________________
Quote:
No trees were harmed in the production of this message.
However, an extremely large number of electrons were rather annoyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
Re: Explain me this...
businesses work for bigger dollars... not efficiency... cleanlyness.... or the like... and they'll make a business out of "cleaning" only when it's produces a dollar even when there is FAR better solutions available....
quite often it's ALOT cheaper and easier and cleaner ... but they would rather go with more expensive, harder, dirtier
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|