LORD hutton in line to get top job at new house of lords replacement

Esaz666 · Jan 30, 2004, 09:30 PM

Now,
all thoses people who think the hutton report in britain was an un-biased report
Iv'e just heard that Lord hutton is to be the chairman of the new house of lords
replacement ....

do you think he was told this before or after he made his judgement ?

Our beloved BBC is in tatters becasue of our swindling lieing government.
Now i know why the hutton report was such a whitewash.

Everyone should band together we must stop these liars we have in government.
They forget nearly everyone in britain has read or heard the testimonies these
people gave in the hutton enquiry. They wanted to stitch up the bbc and they knew they had it all sown up from the start but the side effect of this was to put all the information into the public domain
and this is gonna blow right up in thier faces.

They now have replaced the bbc chairman with an ex-labour MP, he is the one that has given them an unconditional appology, who is he to give an apology , he didnt even work there ....

I see on tv Tony blair smirking and Alister Camble calling on everyone to resign from the bbc so they can put their own people in.
All they want is control over our media industry, well they have won again.
Freedom = 0 , oppresion = 1.

This Government is dirty to the core, rotten liars, I call on all us britsh people how can we let ourselves be represented to the world by these false people who will never admit anything wrong they do, just lies upon lies.

This is supposed to be a democracy. It is if you dont criticise the government, *uck you blair
we'll get you back and your cronies, if you dissagree with the government theyll have your job but we will not forgett your behavour ever.

The people who they have had resign were labour supporters anyway, the goverment can do what ever they like and nobody can stand upto them not even a company as big as the BBC.

~~bluelight~~ · Jan 30, 2004, 09:33 PM

The Hutton report is bollocks.It is obvious that Blair over exaggerated (spelleing) the threat from Saddam Hussein.

The problem is that currently repression has its bloodsucking teeth allover the place.

It will not last forever though.

Bluelight

Cdr · Jan 30, 2004, 09:54 PM

Can I ask if both of you have read the full report, or just going on what you've heard on the news / read in the papers?

~~bluelight~~ · Jan 30, 2004, 10:57 PM

No i havent read the full report but as refered the report clearly states that Blair has not over exaggerated (spelling again?) ...read lied ......anything at all and that all of the blame lies with the BBC.

Something that has automatically led to that heads are rolling at the BBC.

All of this is of course complete bollocks.

Blair did lie and it is clear to anyone.

Even the government of Usa is today backing down on the WMD issue and nobody in the world is gonna try and make me believe that the Cia is THAT incompetent that they were incapable of making correct judgements about his capacity.

It was well known that he had none left after the work done by the UN weapon inspectors.

Scott Ritter who had served during the first Gulf war with WMD issues and then after it with destroying and looking fr them clearly stated that he had no significant power left.

However that DID not suit the Bush government politically so they lied.

Paul Wolfwitz openly said just a couple of weeks after the fall of Bagdad:We needed the WMD issue to getbthings going.

Yeah they lied to push the UN aside and to be able to introduce their own agenda.

Luckily for them the UN had already done the job for them and through the sanctions AND THE DESTRUCTION of their WMD´s Usa and Britain made it to Bagdad in three weeks instead of three months.

Yeah...lied and discredited the UN on purpose.#hich is not so strange considering the Bush government has clearly has declared that they aim to rule the world.

Bluelight

Esaz666 · Jan 31, 2004, 01:50 AM

I have not read the full report but I watched the goverment officials give
evidence every day , while it was happening .I was rivited, I thought
lets see you lot get out of this one ...

but as usual it was a complete farce.
I watched the summing up by Lord Mutton on the tv, the wrong people have
had to resign , it should have been that lieing scum blair.

They have let too much out having the whole thing televised ...
this is going to backfire , dont forget blair was a lawyer and they are all a bunch of lawyers
they thought they could lie thier way out of it, thats the only reason it was televised.

1 ... cambell wanted kellys name out but wanted to leak it in a way so it looked better for the government.
2 ... there were never any weapons of mass destruction in iraq after the last war when the un inspectors stopped him.
3 ... sadam is a blagging bastard, what would you do if you thought Israil would invade you or Iran at any time, I certainly wouldnt say ohh, yes come on lads invade me ive got no weapons hardly at all come and get me.
4 ... it was admitted during the hutton enquiry that they made changes to the dossier ( cambell ie . NO .10 )
taking out the words " may " use weapons of mass destruction " if attacked " and so on, they changed the wording to strengthen the case for war for the PM and they are still getting away with it, yes they did get the head of the JIC to approve it after many changes ' suggested ?' by NO.10 but the head of the JIC is another cambell/ blair man anyway.
5 ... the bbc admited mistakes in the presentation of one broadcast but they didnt appologise for the story because it was true, the guy who has appologised is just a government stooge who has been put incharge of the bbc for now.
6 ... LORD hutton who they put incharge of the enquiry was allready payed off with his new job before he'd even started.
7 ... anyone with any sense can see through all this spin the goverment continually spits out, but they can allways get away with it, I never vote because I dont trust politicians full stop but im gonna vote to get rid of Blair next time, not but we will anyway.

ohh well , what can you do .......? god I never thought labour would start sinking as low as the tories
but theve turned out to be even worse. LoL.

BluntmaN · Jan 31, 2004, 04:48 AM

Nice point are the Tories complaining about the situation? If what you say is true they can blow the wistle and bury Blair once and for all. But they wouldnt even if it is true coz the Tories were the ones supporting Blair. So what do you propose to vote? Lib-Dems sound good but only if the people believe in them who else is there? The greens are to powerless to act.

Esaz666 · Jan 31, 2004, 03:08 PM

Well , i think i'll vote for the raving loonie party.
theyve gotta be better than b liar, no well to be serious
we can have a right wing dracula ' howard '
or we can have the lib dems who are boring and nobody remembers their names
or total lieing scum ?

which one?

I say we send em all to America.

BluntmaN · Jan 31, 2004, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Esaz666
Well , i think i'll vote for the raving loonie party.
theyve gotta be better than b liar, no well to be serious
we can have a right wing dracula ' howard '
or we can have the lib dems who are boring and nobody remembers their names
or total lieing scum ?

which one?

I say we send em all to America.

I say the lib-dems they are nice people and I everytime I watch a debate with a lib-dem he/she always has good arguments.

Jan 30, 2004, 09:30 PM	#1
Esaz666 BeardHeaven Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Uk,Earth,Universe,3rd dimention Posts: 298 Rep Power: 59	LORD hutton in line to get top job at new house of lords replacement Now, all thoses people who think the hutton report in britain was an un-biased report Iv'e just heard that Lord hutton is to be the chairman of the new house of lords replacement .... do you think he was told this before or after he made his judgement ? Our beloved BBC is in tatters becasue of our swindling lieing government. Now i know why the hutton report was such a whitewash. Everyone should band together we must stop these liars we have in government. They forget nearly everyone in britain has read or heard the testimonies these people gave in the hutton enquiry. They wanted to stitch up the bbc and they knew they had it all sown up from the start but the side effect of this was to put all the information into the public domain and this is gonna blow right up in thier faces. They now have replaced the bbc chairman with an ex-labour MP, he is the one that has given them an unconditional appology, who is he to give an apology , he didnt even work there .... I see on tv Tony blair smirking and Alister Camble calling on everyone to resign from the bbc so they can put their own people in. All they want is control over our media industry, well they have won again. Freedom = 0 , oppresion = 1. This Government is dirty to the core, rotten liars, I call on all us britsh people how can we let ourselves be represented to the world by these false people who will never admit anything wrong they do, just lies upon lies. This is supposed to be a democracy. It is if you dont criticise the government, uck you blair we'll get you back and your cronies, if you dissagree with the government theyll have your job but we will not forgett your behavour ever. The people who they have had resign were labour supporters anyway, the goverment can do what ever they like and nobody can stand upto them not even a company as big as the BBC. Last edited by Esaz666; Jan 30, 2004 at 09:35 PM.*

Jan 30, 2004, 09:54 PM	#3
Cdr DriverHeaven Junior Member Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 41 Rep Power: 0	Can I ask if both of you have read the full report, or just going on what you've heard on the news / read in the papers? __________________

Jan 30, 2004, 10:57 PM	#4
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	No i havent read the full report but as refered the report clearly states that Blair has not over exaggerated (spelling again?) ...read lied ......anything at all and that all of the blame lies with the BBC. Something that has automatically led to that heads are rolling at the BBC. All of this is of course complete bollocks. Blair did lie and it is clear to anyone. Even the government of Usa is today backing down on the WMD issue and nobody in the world is gonna try and make me believe that the Cia is THAT incompetent that they were incapable of making correct judgements about his capacity. It was well known that he had none left after the work done by the UN weapon inspectors. Scott Ritter who had served during the first Gulf war with WMD issues and then after it with destroying and looking fr them clearly stated that he had no significant power left. However that DID not suit the Bush government politically so they lied. Paul Wolfwitz openly said just a couple of weeks after the fall of Bagdad:We needed the WMD issue to getbthings going. Yeah they lied to push the UN aside and to be able to introduce their own agenda. Luckily for them the UN had already done the job for them and through the sanctions AND THE DESTRUCTION of their WMD´s Usa and Britain made it to Bagdad in three weeks instead of three months. Yeah...lied and discredited the UN on purpose.#hich is not so strange considering the Bush government has clearly has declared that they aim to rule the world. Bluelight Last edited by bluelight; Jan 30, 2004 at 11:12 PM.

Jan 31, 2004, 01:50 AM	Thread Starter #5
Esaz666 BeardHeaven Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Uk,Earth,Universe,3rd dimention Posts: 298 Rep Power: 59	I have not read the full report but I watched the goverment officials give evidence every day , while it was happening .I was rivited, I thought lets see you lot get out of this one ... but as usual it was a complete farce. I watched the summing up by Lord Mutton on the tv, the wrong people have had to resign , it should have been that lieing scum blair. They have let too much out having the whole thing televised ... this is going to backfire , dont forget blair was a lawyer and they are all a bunch of lawyers they thought they could lie thier way out of it, thats the only reason it was televised. 1 ... cambell wanted kellys name out but wanted to leak it in a way so it looked better for the government. 2 ... there were never any weapons of mass destruction in iraq after the last war when the un inspectors stopped him. 3 ... sadam is a blagging bastard, what would you do if you thought Israil would invade you or Iran at any time, I certainly wouldnt say ohh, yes come on lads invade me ive got no weapons hardly at all come and get me. 4 ... it was admitted during the hutton enquiry that they made changes to the dossier ( cambell ie . NO .10 ) taking out the words " may " use weapons of mass destruction " if attacked " and so on, they changed the wording to strengthen the case for war for the PM and they are still getting away with it, yes they did get the head of the JIC to approve it after many changes ' suggested ?' by NO.10 but the head of the JIC is another cambell/ blair man anyway. 5 ... the bbc admited mistakes in the presentation of one broadcast but they didnt appologise for the story because it was true, the guy who has appologised is just a government stooge who has been put incharge of the bbc for now. 6 ... LORD hutton who they put incharge of the enquiry was allready payed off with his new job before he'd even started. 7 ... anyone with any sense can see through all this spin the goverment continually spits out, but they can allways get away with it, I never vote because I dont trust politicians full stop but im gonna vote to get rid of Blair next time, not but we will anyway. ohh well , what can you do .......? god I never thought labour would start sinking as low as the tories but theve turned out to be even worse. LoL. Last edited by Esaz666; Jan 31, 2004 at 03:12 PM.

Jan 31, 2004, 04:48 AM	#6
BluntmaN DriverHeaven Lover Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: I have no idea Posts: 229 Rep Power: 0	Nice point are the Tories complaining about the situation? If what you say is true they can blow the wistle and bury Blair once and for all. But they wouldnt even if it is true coz the Tories were the ones supporting Blair. So what do you propose to vote? Lib-Dems sound good but only if the people believe in them who else is there? The greens are to powerless to act. __________________ 'Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don't know we don't know.' Donald Rumsfeld (And then they say that the White House knows what it's doing)

Jan 30, 2004, 09:33 PM	#2
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	The Hutton report is bollocks.It is obvious that Blair over exaggerated (spelleing) the threat from Saddam Hussein. The problem is that currently repression has its bloodsucking teeth allover the place. It will not last forever though. Bluelight

Jan 31, 2004, 03:08 PM	Thread Starter #7
Esaz666 BeardHeaven Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Uk,Earth,Universe,3rd dimention Posts: 298 Rep Power: 59	B liar Well , i think i'll vote for the raving loonie party. theyve gotta be better than b liar, no well to be serious we can have a right wing dracula ' howard ' or we can have the lib dems who are boring and nobody remembers their names or total lieing scum ? which one? I say we send em all to America. Last edited by Esaz666; Jan 31, 2004 at 03:16 PM.