It is now ok to keep occupied land

~~bluelight~~ · Apr 15, 2004, 12:27 PM

According to a new international standard which bypasses previous internationally acknowledged ones it has now become ok to keep occupied land for the occupants.

This without negotiating with the part that is occupied.

This new and untried standard (the results are yet to be seen but they will most likely feed even more violence) has been set by two rightwing extreme governments and bypasses both international laws and international treaties.

That....is what i call righwing extremism

Bluelight

ToshiroOC · Apr 17, 2004, 03:57 AM

It is extreme, but I don't think it is necessarily the province of right-wing politicians as much as it is something that governments with somewhat imperialistic leanings do.

~~bluelight~~ · Apr 17, 2004, 08:56 AM

Creating a bantustan for the Palestinians is in this case a rightwing affair .

Two extreme rightwing governments has togheter created the situtation.

Both these partires also have imperialistic ambitions...or more correct the republicans have defined imperialistic ambitions.

Israel is a part of that ambition and serves as an outpost for the expansion in the mideast and thus the conservatives will never accept a peace in Israel based on rights for both parties since rights for the Palestinians automatically means less influence.

Most likely though the above will not becomne reality since one of the architects will probably be charged for the criminality this type of people always tend to lean towards and the other will be voted out for not having delivered and for having lied to his own people.

Bluelight

Bluelight

Apr 15, 2004, 12:27 PM	#1
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	It is now ok to keep occupied land According to a new international standard which bypasses previous internationally acknowledged ones it has now become ok to keep occupied land for the occupants. This without negotiating with the part that is occupied. This new and untried standard (the results are yet to be seen but they will most likely feed even more violence) has been set by two rightwing extreme governments and bypasses both international laws and international treaties. That....is what i call righwing extremism Bluelight

Apr 17, 2004, 03:57 AM	#2
ToshiroOC Unbiased. Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 4,812 Rep Power: 0	It is extreme, but I don't think it is necessarily the province of right-wing politicians as much as it is something that governments with somewhat imperialistic leanings do. __________________ [img][/img] [color=White]Peace be with you, Joe.[/color] Driverheaven Staff Member (Supermoderator)

Apr 17, 2004, 08:56 AM	Thread Starter #3
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	Creating a bantustan for the Palestinians is in this case a rightwing affair . Two extreme rightwing governments has togheter created the situtation. Both these partires also have imperialistic ambitions...or more correct the republicans have defined imperialistic ambitions. Israel is a part of that ambition and serves as an outpost for the expansion in the mideast and thus the conservatives will never accept a peace in Israel based on rights for both parties since rights for the Palestinians automatically means less influence. Most likely though the above will not becomne reality since one of the architects will probably be charged for the criminality this type of people always tend to lean towards and the other will be voted out for not having delivered and for having lied to his own people. Bluelight Bluelight Last edited by bluelight; Apr 17, 2004 at 09:09 AM.