zerodamage

I found this humerous. http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=15399

The_Neon_Cowboy

Great find!!!

hey every little bit helps .. not that i like bush i just hate kerry

zerodamage

Well voting for the other person because you hate the other is the wrong reason for voting. Try finding something you like about Bush. It will then be easier to vote for him. It is typically the left who do the voting out of hate. (We hate Bush, so we will vote for Kerry). I've heard that so much lately.

bluelight

Is that so.

Will you please elaborate that .

Do youy also find rthat short people are happier than tall people?

That are angrier than thin?

Im curious.

Bluelight

bird chest

I don't think one side does it more then the other but I have heard soooooooooo much "I hate bush so I have to vot for kerry."

BiGBrOwNPimpsta

donkey's supporting donkeys, how nice. brethren should stick together

__________________
Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Music | Logitech Z-5500 THX 5.1 Surround Sound Speakers | 2 Lite-On 20x S-ATA Burners | Logitech G700 Mouse | Logitech MX5500 Bluetooth Keyboard

Guidoo

Funny, the hate was coming from the right when Clinton was in office and later when Gore ran for the Presidency. So your statement "It is typically the left who do the voting out of hate" seems to be untrue. Also look at history a bit and you will discover that most of those who stood against civil rights in the 60's were members of the right. Oh there were a few democrats as well, they were reffered to as "dixie-crats". Traditionly these dixie-crats were "conservative" democrats. They along with many on the right embodied the very meaning of "hate" They felt that a persons skin color or national origin could somehow make that person more or less of a person. Perhaps you weren't around to see those things ? And I dont mean that as an attack on you. But judging from your BD listed in your profile you were not around in that era and are probably judging things over a much shorter time period. Were you active in polotics prior to 2000 ?? or even 1996. Perhaps before you make such a blanket statement you should look at a bit more of history.

Guido

zerodamage

Come on now, that is incorrect. Before you quote history, it is best that you know it. The democrats were primarily against it and if it wasn't for the republicans at that time, it is hard telling how blacks would be treated today.

Now I am not going to debate this or argue with you about this. I just think the truth should be told. Not the myth you stated above.



http://www.everythingmacosx.com/moi/...es/000030.html

http://www.ghg.net/hollaway/civil/civil17.htm

http://www.congresslink.org/civil/essay.html

http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum...2.03.04.x.html

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/arti...3/194350.shtml

zerodamage

Actually, the republicans are the Elephant where the Democrats are the Donkey.

bluelight

Well theres not many options are there?If you dont like Bush...then there is Kerry...Kerry....Kerry ...and......Nader.



Bluelight

Guidoo

You can lead a horse to water but you cant make him drink ....Before you tell me I'm "stating a myth" you should read through the yale.edu link you provided. The following is a direct quote.


"literacy and poll taxes" the so called "brown laws" enacted in many sothern states, aimed at denial of voting rights to black americans , these laws were also favored by the "dixie-crats". The "dixie-crats" were southern democrats who fought very hard against civil rights. I hardly think they represent democrats in general. Thankfully enough members of both parties voted for passage of the CVA . This is the truth.....a wee bit different than you believe or state.

Guido

zerodamage

I normally would not quote a source like Yale which happens to be a very liberal university. However some of what is there are facts that even they can not deny. I have more than just that one link and most of the dixie-crats went back to being democrats. Byrd for one.