Goodbye Rumsfeld !

~~bluelight~~ · May 16, 2004, 09:03 AM

Goodbye Rumsfeld!!

Bluelight

The_Neon_Cowboy · May 16, 2004, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by bluelight
Goodbye Rumsfeld!!

Bluelight

bush probubly told him to do it lol

this whole iraq war thing man kerry useing it against bush. bush gets everything clened up and start pulling people out before the november elections and it'll help him alot...

people are voting for carry to vote for kerry ... thier just voting agesnt bush with little regard who they vote for knowing nader will never win they go kerry in the polls....

Man i hope bush wins, actually I'd rather nader to win then kerry

~~bluelight~~ · May 16, 2004, 12:03 PM

And here is the expected act of denial

Which of course will not be sufficent.There are to many ...below Rumsfeld that will want to save their skin..so they will talk...wheter they are asked to do so in court or not..

I have seen an interwiew with Rumsfeld a year ago where he defended the use of interogation metods that were not according to regular human rights.

Bluelight

The_Neon_Cowboy · May 16, 2004, 12:36 PM

white house responds to the new yorker artical with stringent denials

~~bluelight~~ · May 16, 2004, 02:08 PM

Yeah.Normally refered to as lies.

Im not worried.The truth will be out and acknowledged since it is already obvious where the guilt is.
The first step will be selling out Rumsfeld which will not be enough to secure the elections.

Bluelight

~~bluelight~~ · May 17, 2004, 10:08 AM

The below is a qoute from Powell where he is asked about a memo written by a republican governmen t advisor which says...human rights isssues must bee put aside...bla bla bla..

A memo nobody seems to remember today ...surprisingly ..

Well....Why is it then that Powell (according to himself) has been in need to DEFEND the human rights aspect within his government unless someone proposed to bypass them?

Qoute from NewYork times.

!Asked about it on the NBC News program "Meet the Press," Mr. Powell said he could not recall the specific memo but said he had always argued that the Bush administration should comply with the provisions of the Geneva accords — "either by the letter, if it's appropriate to those individuals in our custody that they are really directly under the Geneva Convention, or if they're illegal noncombatants and not directly under the convention, we should treat them nevertheless in a humane manner in accordance with what is expected of by international law and the Geneva Convention."

May 16, 2004, 09:03 AM	#1
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	Goodbye Rumsfeld ! Goodbye Rumsfeld!! Bluelight

May 16, 2004, 12:36 PM	#4
The_Neon_Cowboy HardwareHeaven Extreme Member Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: U.S.A. Posts: 16,009 Rep Power: 92 System Specs	white house responds to the new yorker artical with stringent denials __________________

May 16, 2004, 12:03 PM	Thread Starter #3
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	And here is the expected act of denial Which of course will not be sufficent.There are to many ...below Rumsfeld that will want to save their skin..so they will talk...wheter they are asked to do so in court or not.. I have seen an interwiew with Rumsfeld a year ago where he defended the use of interogation metods that were not according to regular human rights. Bluelight

May 16, 2004, 02:08 PM	Thread Starter #5
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	Yeah.Normally refered to as lies. Im not worried.The truth will be out and acknowledged since it is already obvious where the guilt is. The first step will be selling out Rumsfeld which will not be enough to secure the elections. Bluelight

May 17, 2004, 10:08 AM	Thread Starter #6
~~bluelight~~ Banned Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,328 Rep Power: 0	The below is a qoute from Powell where he is asked about a memo written by a republican governmen t advisor which says...human rights isssues must bee put aside...bla bla bla.. A memo nobody seems to remember today ...surprisingly .. Well....Why is it then that Powell (according to himself) has been in need to DEFEND the human rights aspect within his government unless someone proposed to bypass them? Qoute from NewYork times. !Asked about it on the NBC News program "Meet the Press," Mr. Powell said he could not recall the specific memo but said he had always argued that the Bush administration should comply with the provisions of the Geneva accords — "either by the letter, if it's appropriate to those individuals in our custody that they are really directly under the Geneva Convention, or if they're illegal noncombatants and not directly under the convention, we should treat them nevertheless in a humane manner in accordance with what is expected of by international law and the Geneva Convention."