HardwareHeaven.com

HardwareHeaven.com

Looking for the skin chooser?
 
 
  • Home

  • Hardware reviews

  • Articles

  • News

  • Tools

  • Gaming at HardwareHeaven

  • Forums

 

Go Back   HardwareHeaven.com > Forums > News > Other Tech News > Polls


Polls This forum contains the front page polls.

Poll: Assuming a 512MB graphics board costs roughly $150 more than a 256MB board......
Poll Options
Assuming a 512MB graphics board costs roughly $150 more than a 256MB board......

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Mar 2, 2005, 05:59 PM   #1
DriverHeaven Founder
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,480
Rep Power: 179
Zardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refute

Assuming a 512MB graphics board costs roughly $150 more than a 256MB board ........

would you want one? vote
Zardon is offline   Reply With Quote


Old Mar 2, 2005, 06:05 PM   #2
HardwareHeaven News Mod
 
MIG-31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Nottingham,UK
Posts: 56,843
Rep Power: 471
MIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his statusMIG-31 is godlike in his status
System Specs

Too expensive.... imo.

would be nice to have 512mg card but have not had my x800pro long enough.
__________________

Please Post Your News Submissions Here
MIG-31 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 06:07 PM   #3
Int'l Fish Liaison
 
Vikingod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: By the light of lamp I sit and type...
Posts: 16,197
Rep Power: 112
Vikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seenVikingod has a divinity and aura the likes we have never seen
System Specs

maybe in a few years, when it might really matter in games, but the graphics are only as pretty as they are programed.
Vikingod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 06:17 PM   #4
DriverHeaven Newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
nofool is on a distinguished road

Agree with Vikingod

I never imagined that I'd still be running my ancient 2.6GHz P4 on an Intel 850 mobo (AGP 4X), but, hey, it runs just great with 1 GB of 800 MHz RAM, even if it is single-channel. What makes it possible to hang in today, tho, is the X800 Pro vid card. Its 256MB memory has been more than the equal of any requirement I've seen to date.

Doom III was not "ATI-friendly", but even so I played it on Ultra setting (yeah, no kidding) by overclocking the core and memory to 525 MHz and 515 MHz respectively. Half Life 2 required no overclocking at all, and all settings were maxed.

I fully expected to be running a PCIe rig by now, but the rollout of PCI Express has been a three-stooges nightmare and even now there are huge concerns about components, drivers, service pack 2, etc., etc. So, the last thing I need to worry about now is some 512 MB video card. If there were any games that required such a thing that I wanted so bad I couldn't stand it, I'd see if I could get an AGP version. It'll be a LONG time before I jump off into the uncertainties of PCIe as we've seen it so far.
nofool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 06:31 PM   #5
Lurking DriverHeaven
 
CDsDontBurn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,790
Rep Power: 235
CDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his status
System Specs

for an extra $150 more, yea i'd get a 512Mb card. The average price i'm seeing for the 6800GTs is around $400 (US), so yea, i'd pay $550 for a 512Mb version of the 6800GT. Games will soon require more than 256Mb of video memory and it's nice to stay ahead of the game sometimes .
__________________

CDsDontBurn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 06:52 PM Threadstarter Thread Starter   #6
DriverHeaven Founder
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 32,480
Rep Power: 179
Zardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refuteZardon has a reputation beyond refute

512 will help with modern titles at resolutions like 1600x1200. however if you have a 15inch monitor and game at 800x600 or 1024x768 its pretty much a waste of time.
Zardon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 07:15 PM   #7
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Danhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,112
Rep Power: 0
Danhill is on a distinguished road

Donator
No not now, maybe next year.
__________________
MOBO: [color=white]ASUS A8N-SLI Premium[/color] CPU: AMD 64 3200+ (Venice) @ 2,50 Ghz MEM: 2 x 512 DDR 466, VGA: 2 x 6600 GT in SLI, HDD1: WD Raptor HDD2: Maxtor Diamond Plus 9, Case: Antec Plus View 1080, PSU: ThermalTake PurePower 500W, MX 1000, Dell 2001 FP, Aud. 2 SZ
Danhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 07:43 PM   #8
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
The_Neon_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,009
Rep Power: 92
The_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the roughThe_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the roughThe_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the rough
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zardon
512 will help with modern titles at resolutions like 1600x1200. however if you have a 15inch monitor and game at 800x600 or 1024x768 its pretty much a waste of time.
I'd still do it...

I have a 19" monitor and game at only 1024x768 becouse I hate setting up my monitor.. it has to be just right the boarders etc... When I go other resoultions it looks wrong.. if I fix it when ? I go back to my desktop .. I'm fixing it again.. repeat...

So I pick a resoultion that I like for my desktop and stick with it for eveything...
If I coose much larger the text starts getting smaller then I like for fast, easy
and heavy reading...

Anyways wouldn't that extra ram still help with running high AA/AF
high quailty texures etc?
__________________

Last edited by The_Neon_Cowboy; Mar 2, 2005 at 08:31 PM.
The_Neon_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 07:59 PM   #9
DriverHeaven Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Hamilton Ontario
Posts: 74
Rep Power: 0
J0rs is on a distinguished road

If I had a monitor that was capable of a res higher than 1280X1024, then I would spend the extra money. For now, my 128mb 9800 pro (flashed to xt) is fine.
__________________
AMD 2500+ OC'd to 3200+ || 9800np mod to 9800XT || 1gb of 3200 ram
2005fpw 20" Widescreen LCD w/ 12ms response
J0rs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 09:38 PM   #10
Rolling the Hard Six
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lock Haven, PA
Posts: 767
Rep Power: 0
studbagel9 is on a distinguished road
System Specs

Donator
Remember when video cards were 300 dollars for the high end? ::smile:: ::tear:: What happened to the good old days. 700 dollars for a video card is completely outrageous.
__________________
studbagel9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 10:04 PM   #11
DriverHeaven Senior Member
 
Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California USA
Posts: 464
Rep Power: 0
Raptor is on a distinguished road

Donator
Nope. Too expensive....
Raptor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 10:19 PM   #12
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Floatin'...
Posts: 4,957
Rep Power: 0
Drakon will become famous soon enough

Donator
too expensive indeed. besides i don't game @ 1600 x 1200.
Drakon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 10:20 PM   #13
I = Greatest Dood
 
GutterPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 5,949
Rep Power: 71
GutterPunk is just super!GutterPunk is just super!GutterPunk is just super!GutterPunk is just super!GutterPunk is just super!GutterPunk is just super!GutterPunk is just super!

Donator
No thanks but if i could afford it heck yeah! my 9800pro does its justice
__________________
Rock On \m/ Thank you Mousey for the Sig!
---------------

Intel Core2Duo E6660 (3.4GHZ) ~ Tuniq Tower 120 ~ Enermax Galaxy 1000W ~ Corsair Dominator @ 1090MHZ 5-5-5-15 (OCZ XTC Modded Cooler)~ EVGA 8800GTX W/ HR-03 Plus 120MM ~ Asus DVD-RW LiteScribe ~ LG DVD-RW ~ Corsair Voyager 2GB ReadyBoost Drive ~ Vantec Nexus Fan Controller ~ ThermalTake Armor 25CM fan ~
Personal Finance Blog: Dent Your Debt
GutterPunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 10:21 PM   #14
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
swimtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,040
Rep Power: 124
swimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refuteswimtech has a reputation beyond refute
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zardon
512 will help with modern titles at resolutions like 1600x1200. however if you have a 15inch monitor and game at 800x600 or 1024x768 its pretty much a waste of time.
Yup, there you are...

I game on a 17" running 1024x768, much like Neon am very picky about the geometry so I leave it (occasionlly dropping down to 800x600).

Will likely get a 21" or better "display" late this year or early next year though and have read that the extra onboard video ram helped modern games at high res. I'm admittedly not up to speed on the whys and wherefores of exactly what is stored in video ram though (I started losing track after 8meg video cards with 3d, z dimension, aa,af, etc. was implemented) and do wonder why so much ram is needed. I'm familiar with why, but not versed.

Maybe a primer thread in the tech discussion area when you get a chance?
__________________
It's not so much getting your way that matters or not - what matters is how you go about getting it.
swimtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 10:55 PM   #15
DriverHeaven Lover
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 136
Rep Power: 0
FDM80 is on a distinguished road

Personally I think something is wrong when you can build a half decent PC running, for instance, an Athlon XP processor and you can spend $600. Or $600 for a 512MB card. A high end video card can approach 50% of someone's budget for a rig. That's just too high a percentage going to one piece of a machine.
__________________
Verizon FIOS rules!
FDM80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 11:25 PM   #16
Lurking DriverHeaven
 
CDsDontBurn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern California
Posts: 22,790
Rep Power: 235
CDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his statusCDsDontBurn is godlike in his status
System Specs

my personal rule of thumb for a gaming machine is that the cost of both the CPU and MoBo should be about half the cost of the video card(s). Of course, not everybody can afford such parts, so they gotta cut corners here and there.
__________________

CDsDontBurn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 11:31 PM   #17
Styleless Wonder
 
No_Style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 6,034
Rep Power: 0
No_Style is on a distinguished road

I'm picky about the set up with my monitor which is why I enjoy everything being played at 1280x960 @ 85 Hz and VSYNC. So if a 512 MB card is needed for me to play my games at this resolution with a touch of AA/AF then I guess I'd shell out for a 512MB card.
__________________
"The Best Style Is No Style"
Specifications Here

No_Style is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 11:31 PM   #18
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,187
Rep Power: 71
Zelig has much to be proud ofZelig has much to be proud ofZelig has much to be proud ofZelig has much to be proud ofZelig has much to be proud ofZelig has much to be proud ofZelig has much to be proud ofZelig has much to be proud of
System Specs

Nope, I won't be buying a card for such a price.

I picked up my 128MB R360 core 9800 pro for under $300 canadian just after the 6800 ultra was announced, and it's still doing me fine. I can't see myself spending anything over $300 (canadian) on a new video card anytime soon.

I barely game anymore, and mostly older games at that, so I'd rather spend my money on other stuff.
__________________
--
Zelig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 2, 2005, 11:35 PM   #19
Styleless Wonder
 
No_Style's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 6,034
Rep Power: 0
No_Style is on a distinguished road

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zelig
I picked up my 128MB R360 core 9800 pro for under $300 canadian just after the 6800 ultra was announced, and it's still doing me fine. I can't see myself spending anything over $300 (canadian) on a new video card anytime soon.
Hey I did that as well.
__________________
"The Best Style Is No Style"
Specifications Here

No_Style is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 01:48 AM   #20
DriverHeaven Knight
 
kelticknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EIRE{great for black stuff ,bulmers cider and Munster rubgy
Posts: 1,095
Rep Power: 0
kelticknight is on a distinguished road

Donator
got my x800xt pe late in dec 04.at time was king,now the x850xt pe is.both have 256 ram.now a 512 card.haven't see a game yet that uses the full 256ram yet alone 128 ram.all l can see is ati and nvidia trying to beat each other with most powerful of cards at the customers expense.most peoples wallets don't always have that kind of money.for me for now l like to get my worths out of my x800xt pe.maybe in 2006 i'll think about it,if its more than 540 euros that l payed for my current card ,the answer is NO BLODY WAY
CHEERS
kelticknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 02:23 AM   #21
BWX
unplugged
 
BWX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USNY
Posts: 19,669
Rep Power: 110
BWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud of
System Specs

Donator
Considering how expensive they are already, no way.. Maybe another $50 to $75, but $150 on top of an already insanely expensive product is way too much for the rare instances that the extra 256mb would actually even be beneficial.
__________________
BWX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 03:20 AM   #22
my bud > yours
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 399
Rep Power: 0
eggs420 is on a distinguished road

No freaking way. I can see some folks going for it, but too rich for my blood. I'll stick with very playable resolutions and performance, and pay car insurance or something with the extra...
__________________
AMD64 2800+ // Chaintech VNF3-250 // 2X512mb PDI ddr400 2-3-2-5 // 80gb 7200RPM WD w/8mb cache // Leadtek 6800GT // 144kbit IDSL

Clan -=CCC=- Admin
69.31.96.68 BF2 PUBLIC RANKED SERVER
205.218.65.236 BF2 DEMO SERVER
eggs420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 06:52 AM   #23
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
 
The_Neon_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 16,009
Rep Power: 92
The_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the roughThe_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the roughThe_Neon_Cowboy is a jewel in the rough
System Specs

Quote:
Originally Posted by studbagel9
Remember when video cards were 300 dollars for the high end? ::smile:: ::tear:: What happened to the good old days. 700 dollars for a video card is completely outrageous.
Did that card have 512mb of ram? runing at insane speeds? a 500mhz gpu? 16 pipelines? etc?
NO!

No? you have your answer... A beter product = a higher price..... Not only becouse it's better and faster becouse it's newer and more expensive to produce... card parts aren't free....

the extra 256mb of VERY EXPENSIVE MEMORY, extra parts, diffrent design
they've got to recoup thier money....

I mean you don't see any one crying about top end car prices... It's the same big fancy car with sweete body (card) a big engine ( GPU+MEM) and fully loaded naturally cost more then a generic car with a small engine and no options (features)....


Actally $300 isn't what it once was eather! Not in the lest... Actually I'm ptrrry sure I paid closer to $350 for my 1st radeon 64mb ddr vivo (183/183 & 2 pixel pipes) and that was after the price dropped!!!...

I mean I guess they could make a card much like the 9600XT with 512mb of ram for you guys but I doubt that would pass muster

You guys are fuuny you want you cake and eat it too! But someone has to pay the baker!
Stuff isn't free....
__________________
The_Neon_Cowboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 07:00 AM   #24
| n f e c t e D
 
Ev!L-aLphA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: California
Posts: 4,111
Rep Power: 0
Ev!L-aLphA will become famous soon enough

same i just got my x800xt pe a couple of monthes ago... its really tempting but to expensive at the moment.. my next pc upgrade (in a year or two) will have PCI-E and hopfully a 512 mb card (or even 1gb card )
__________________

R.I.P
8/8/04
4/21/08
Ev!L-aLphA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 07:02 AM   #25
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Danhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,112
Rep Power: 0
Danhill is on a distinguished road

Donator
Neon, only you would compare a car with a videocard lol.

I think that the price on the video cards is going to rise more.

As I said eariler, now I wouldn't pay 150$ for another 256 Mb, I'm guessing that when it's time for me to change the card in a year or so then the cards that are available by then, they allready have 512 Mb I guess.
__________________
MOBO: [color=white]ASUS A8N-SLI Premium[/color] CPU: AMD 64 3200+ (Venice) @ 2,50 Ghz MEM: 2 x 512 DDR 466, VGA: 2 x 6600 GT in SLI, HDD1: WD Raptor HDD2: Maxtor Diamond Plus 9, Case: Antec Plus View 1080, PSU: ThermalTake PurePower 500W, MX 1000, Dell 2001 FP, Aud. 2 SZ
Danhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 07:13 AM   #26
Dark Jedi
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Essex, England
Posts: 334
Rep Power: 0
starfury6 is on a distinguished road
System Specs

My 6800U PCI-e cost me £440 (GBP), there's no way in hell I'd pay $150 over the top of that (about £80 with current exchanges but it always works out more).
__________________
[color=DeepSkyBlue][/color]
[color=DeepSkyBlue] Intel Q6600 / Dual 8800 GTS 512/ Asus Striker II Formula
OCZ 4GB DDR2 1066 / Scythe Ninja / Hyper 880w
3 x Maxtor 750GB total SATAII / LG Multi Blu[/color]
starfury6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 08:17 AM   #27
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,472
Rep Power: 0
Sandok will become famous soon enoughSandok will become famous soon enough

Depends... If's i'm going to be dishing out 800CHF for a 3D card, I might add the extra 200chf for the ram... Who knows?
Sandok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 08:21 AM   #28
HardwareHeaven Senior Member
 
Son_of_Thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 1,441
Rep Power: 0
Son_of_Thunder will become famous soon enoughSon_of_Thunder will become famous soon enough
System Specs

not for a loooong time. my last upgrade will be my HDD, and then i'm letting this sytem coast for a few years.

1500 bucks is a lot to spend on a system, expecially when you only make 6usd/hour
__________________
Son_of_Thunder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 09:41 AM   #29
BWX
unplugged
 
BWX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USNY
Posts: 19,669
Rep Power: 110
BWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud ofBWX has much to be proud of
System Specs

Donator
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Neon_Cowboy

I mean you don't see any one crying about top end car prices... It's the same big fancy car with sweete body (card) a big engine ( GPU+MEM) and fully loaded naturally cost more then a generic car with a small engine and no options (features)....

Hehe, yes.... but top end sports cars appreciate in value or hold value.. none depreciate as fast as PC hardware.

That's the sad part about PC hardware. A Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, etc, made 10 or 20 years ago is still very valuable and fun to drive now, a video card from 10 or even 5 years ago-- well, that's in the junk pile even if it is in mint condition.. obsolete. At least you can still drive a car, the old top end video cards aren't worth the space they take up in the cardboard box they live in "for gaming".


That's why Top end PC hardware is so difficult for people to spend huge amounts of money on, it loses value faster than just about anything I can think of. 2 years ago I bought my 9700Pro for 300+ dollars.. Now it's practically worthless. not useless yet, but still worth very little actual money).

That's why I am still waiting to upgrade, I am not going to spend 300, 400, 600 bucks on a video card every year, especially when the really truly great games are so painfully few and far between these days.

I understand the people who really want the best at all times, I mean it is fun and if you can sell the "1 year old top end card" for a good price it is worth doing, but it is still an expensive habit.

Then when you consider all the other PC parts you need to upgrade to give the top end bran new video card a proper home... it just makes the whole process 10 x more expensive than just the video card purchase.
__________________
BWX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2005, 09:46 AM   #30
DriverHeaven Extreme Member
 
Danhill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,112
Rep Power: 0
Danhill is on a distinguished road

Donator
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWX
Hehe, yes.... but top end sports cars appreciate in value or hold value.. none depreciate as fast as PC hardware.

That's the sad part about PC hardware. A Porsche, Ferrari, Lambo, etc, made 10 or 20 years ago is still very valuable and fun to drive now, a video card from 10 or even 5 years ago-- well, that's in the junk pile even if it is in mint condition.. obsolete. At least you can still drive a car, the old top end video cards aren't worth the space they take up in the cardboard box they live in "for gaming".


That's why Top end PC hardware is so difficult for people to spend huge amounts of money on, it loses value faster than just about anything I can think of. 2 years ago I bought my 9700Pro for 300+ dollars.. Now it's practically worthless. not useless yet, but still worth very little actual money).

That's why I am still waiting to upgrade, I am not going to spend 300, 400, 600 bucks on a video card every year, especially when the really truly great games are so painfully few and far between these days.

I understand the people who really want the best at all times, I mean it is fun and if you can sell the "1 year old top end card" for a good price it is worth doing, but it is still an expensive habit.

Then when you consider all the other PC parts you need to upgrade to give the top end bran new video card a proper home... it just makes the whole process 10 x more expensive than just the video card purchase.
Well said BWX, I totaly agree, it is a very expensive hobby to have a PC.
__________________
MOBO: [color=white]ASUS A8N-SLI Premium[/color] CPU: AMD 64 3200+ (Venice) @ 2,50 Ghz MEM: 2 x 512 DDR 466, VGA: 2 x 6600 GT in SLI, HDD1: WD Raptor HDD2: Maxtor Diamond Plus 9, Case: Antec Plus View 1080, PSU: ThermalTake PurePower 500W, MX 1000, Dell 2001 FP, Aud. 2 SZ
Danhill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools