| Photoshop Benchmark |
AMD FX-8150 |
Intel i7-2600K |
| Texturiser |
1.0 |
0.6 |
| CMYK Colour Conversion |
0.8 |
0.7 |
| RGB |
0.8 |
0.7 |
| Ink |
14.6 |
12.5 |
| Dust |
1.1 |
1.2 |
| Watercolor |
15.0 |
12.3 |
| Texturiser 2 |
0.9 |
0.6 |
| Stained |
12.3 |
7.3 |
| Lighting |
1.3 |
1.1 |
| Mosaic |
6.9 |
6.0 |
| Extrude |
53.9 |
38.4 |
| Smart Blur |
51.4 |
34.0 |
| Underpaint |
20.6 |
14.3 |
| Palette |
17.3 |
12.0 |
| Sponge |
20.9 |
17.8 |
| Total |
218.8 |
159.5 |
The FX-8150 is priced at a level between the 2500K and 2600K however given the market targeted by the AMD CPU and upcoming release of the 2700K which will affect the 2600K price we feel the 2600K is the most appropriate comparison CPU now and in the coming months. So, starting with the two synthetic tests we see that when the Intel CPU has a small lead over the AMD chip with the fully multi-threaded Cinebench scoring the 2600K around .80 points ahead when both have their turbo feature enabled.
Moving to Photoshop it comes as no surprise that Intel have the lead here, it is something which has been the case for many generations of products and Bulldozer/FX has not changed this.
