This review uses custom javascript
to display high resolution images
Performance
Notes: The
performance tests took place on an Asus P5WD2-E
Deluxe motherboard. Unfortunately I do not have
another high speed 2GB flash drive for comparison,
but I do have a 512MB Revoltec File Carrier USB
2.0 flash drive which should make a nice comparison
between the tests. The older Kingston 128MB drive
that I do have was extremely slow compared to the
Gizmo! and File Carrier, so I did not include it
in the benchmarks.
dont have flash installed? then click here
for a jpeg image of the above graph
dont have flash installed? then click here
for a jpeg image of the above graph
dont have flash installed? then click here
for a jpeg image of the above graph
HDTach is
a benchmarking utility primarily used for benchmarking
hard disk drives. But it also works on flash disk
drives and can show the theoretical transfer speeds
of the flash drive. As you can see, the Gizmo! has
a read burst speed of 11.5MB/s, an average read
speed of 8.9MB/s and an average write speed of 10MB/s.
It is not the fastest drive I have ever seen but
still is about 25% faster than the File Carrier
in these tests. What makes me wonder is that this
is the only flash disk drive that I have ever seen
which has a higher write speed than read speed!
It can be written faster than it can be read,
according to HDTach.
Gizmo
Revoltec
In SisoftSandra, the Gizmo! bests the File
Carrier in every given way. Especially when accessing
small chunks of data, the Gizmo! is many times faster
than the File Carrier. Even though this performance
gap closes in as the file size gets higher, it can
only close in when >2MB files are used, and even
so the Gizmo! still wins by a good 35-40% difference.
The Gizmo! also has a much higher endurance factor,
19.7 compared to the 14.7 of the File Carrier.
dont have flash installed? then click here
for a jpeg image of the above graph
As many people
suggest, and I agree, flash disk drives are dangerous
to compare in synthetic benchmarks, since they may
work quite differently in real life. Agreeing to
that, I took a 500MB file (unfortunately limited
by the capacity of the File Carrier) and measured
the time it needed to be copied to the flash disk
drive. Here also the Gizmo! took a very clear win,
with a time of just over 49 seconds, where the File
Carrier needed over 1 minute and 12 seconds.
Final words and conclusion
The new 2GB Gizmo! drive
is certainly a very useful device to have. Being
1400 times larger than a floppy disk, much smaller
and able to be read/written just like a small hard
disk drive are what make it being so versatile.
And as USB technology is advancing, I doubt that
its capabilities will be reduced to storage, for
example considering that most motherboards nowadays
support booting from USB devices. More advanced
users can easily install entire operating systems
inside the Gizmo!. I believe that already there
are several Linux distributions made specifically
for USB flash drives and many others can be modified
to work inside them. This can make the Gizmo! a
very nice small hard disk drive for exceptionally
small and silent systems, or even a restoration/backup
bootable disk. Unfortunately the price per MB is
quite high, as you are going to pay for the Gizmo!
just as much as a 250GB hard disk drive would cost
nowadays. But of course you cannot have a hard disk
drive which weights next to nothing, is just as
small as your key ring and you can carry around
inside your pocket. There are also the 1GB and 512MB
versions of the Gizmo! available, which cost considerably
less.
My thanks
to Gill Smith, Crucial EU, for providing us with
a sample of the Gizmo! drive for the needs of this
review.