For our results we have noted the IDLE temp at stock
and when overclocked…of course taken when the PC
had been idle in the test room for 30 minutes. The Load
temps at stock and overclocked were taken during 3 loops
of PC Mark 04’s CPU tests. Shown the highest temperatures
registered during the loops.
Dont have Flash installed? then click here
to see a jpeg version of the graph above
Quite a difference in idle temps for
the two cooling methods, a 26% improvement by using the
Cool system. Lets hope this continues when under load.
Dont have Flash installed? then click here
to see a jpeg version of the graph above
When the CPU is under load there is an
improvement in performance over the idle temps. Where
as at idle the two cooling methods had a 11 degree difference
in the Load tests it’s moved up to 13 degrees (23%).
The Corsair cool is performing very well. For further
comparison an Asetek 3x120mm system cools to about 41
degrees under the same conditions in 7v mode.
Now on to the Overclocks.
Our CPU overclock on the Corsair Cool
slightly exceeded that possible on air. We were able to
raise the FSB from 200mhz to 222mhz resulting in a CPU
speed of 2664mhz (Stock is 2400mhz). This means the Cool
is allowing our Athlon 64 4000+ to exceed FX55 specifications.
Dont have Flash installed? then click here
to see a jpeg version of the graph above
The Load temps when overclocked were
as follows…
Dont have Flash installed? then click here
to see a jpeg version of the graph above
Good results again from the Corsair system,
even when pushing the CPU as far as it can the system
still maintains a healthy 11 degree temperature advantage
over the slightly slower air cooled system.