|
|||||||
| Windows Vista Forum Discussion, driver support and everything related to Windows Vista |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
Pretty interesting how much Vista Caches for Memory [56K Wanrning!]
Before with my 2gb install, when using vista, i rarely saw more then 800-1300mb of memory cached.. leaving no less then 200mb free.
but i'm noticing with my 4gb installation.. and i've even had 8gb loaded just to see if the effects were the same.... with this newer board and with vista x64 as well..... every single drop of memory is fully cached.. Performance is utterly amazingly GREAT..... no delay in loading anything.. but i just find it interesting how much is cached.... and emediately when memory is made available, how quickly it caches it again. It's weird seeing 7000mb Cache with the 8gb... this is what 4gb looks like on a Recently installed and only running without much of anything going on after a fresh bootup. ![]() oh and btw, before anyone that starts spouting off about how horrible vista is and how waistful and bloated it is.. it's CACHE, it's not memory IN USE....
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
HardwareHeaven Extreme Member
|
Yeah, actually goes right down to 0 free if you let it. Next time I build myself a desktop in a couple years, I'm going to be tempted to stuff around 32GB of ECC ram into it...
__________________
-- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
If that's ANY time soon, i'm not going to even guestimate that cost of 32gb.... i saw what 16gb of bufffered ECC ram cost......it's rediculious.....
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
DDR2 FB-DIMM ECC is still expensive, but not that very expensive like it used to be in just couple years back, and i think it's now DDR2-800 and is available for a newer or upcoming chipset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
a.k.a. pepiman
|
It does in fact CACHE every inch of your RAM. I'd love to know what it's caching though ... most used files?
Cuz at this point, it's going to be caching Crysis lol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
all i know is that vista lets go of the memory really fast when something needs it... reguardless of it being used by windows or cacheing....
also, it's pretty noticeable once you've had vista setup for any length of time, how quickly things start to load
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
tried to give my new install of Vista some exercise to see if it will lag while running some large workloads, tried to use up every bit of the system memory. the Readyboost and paging file were both came to play and rescue, the Vista didn't seem to want to crash at all, and it kept running smoothly throughout. Vista is very stable desktop OS.
![]() ![]() ![]()
Last edited by PangingJr; Dec 18, 2007 at 08:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obvious Closet Brony Pony
|
yeah i'm seeing vista rock solid everywhere
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
have a see here for WS08 64-bit RC
just about every bit of the system memory had been used (not by the OS itself), it would not crash. ![]()
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|