|
|||||||
| Windows XP / 2000 / NT / 9x Forum Discussion for Windows operating systems from XP right back to the very beginnings! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
a.k.a. pepiman
|
Windows RAM limit?
Hey guys
Someone has to explain this to me without using gigantic words... If I am running Windows XP Pro (32-bit) on an AMD X2 6000+ with 4GB of RAM.... what does that mean in terms of limitations? I have 2 kits of 2gb of OCZ 800mhz ram (so 1gb-1gb-1gb-1gb) Will I be limited to 2 or 3gb or something? The explanations I've found on the net are not extra clear... Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.k.a. pepiman
|
No replies... things are looking grim... Should I just go ahead and install Windows Vista 64bit Ultimate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
HH's Nokia shareholder!
|
32-bit windows can only utilize 3 Gb RAM 64-bit windows can have much more
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
HH Old Fuddy Duddy
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
HH's Nokia shareholder!
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.k.a. pepiman
|
Well I'm convinced on installing Vista 64... maybe Home since Ultimate doesn't offer that much over Home edition...
Seems like SP1 has more and more drivers etc... and Vista 64 is the way to go ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Lurking DriverHeaven
|
Quote:
Quote:
it's weird how it works. so yea. if you want to use all 4GB of system memory w/o any fuss, go winXP x64 or vista x64 to use all that memory. but you'll have the downside of not every program being compatible w/an x64 based OS. so, choose your poison |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.k.a. pepiman
|
ok but those "programs who won't run on vista 64" ... they can be run using the compatibility mode right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
HH's Nokia shareholder!
|
Quote:
Yeah the windows will know what programs are 32-bit and use the WOW64 mode straight away so you don't need to do anything ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Flash Banner Hater
|
If Vista 64 would dual boot without too many complications, then you could have the best of both worlds...
64 bit to make the most of the RAM and memory map (also for 32 bit applications which are virtual space compromised). AnandTech: A Messy Transition: Practical Problems With 32bit Addressing In Windows - this discusses some problems and solutions related to the address space limitation. An alternative 32 bit OS, for things which don't like Vista or WOW64
__________________
Mary had a little lamb, Her father shot it dead Now Mary takes her lamb to school, Between two crusts of bread
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,989
Rep Power: 71 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
i used to have both Vista 32-bit and 64-bit during they were beta, but have not tried in the release versions since i will need to have another Vista's licence. personally, i think there is not too many complications to dual boot them if needed, and based on my past experience the dual booting is not a self-complicating system at all.
as for about answering the op's original question, this below Microsoft article may not explain well, however, this is more about 4 GB of RAM installed and Vista -- The system memory that is reported in the System Information dialog box in Windows Vista is less than you expect if 4 GB of RAM is installed this below article talks about the set PAE forceenable. i personally don't recommend using this method, the Windows system may not stable due to problem of some device drivers. - Feed 4 GB of RAM to 32-bit Windows Vista - No more memory limitations - Softpedia Last edited by PangingJr; Nov 6, 2007 at 09:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a.k.a. pepiman
|
I've installed Vista x64 Ultimate.
Every program I use seems to be fine except for: - Crap Cleaner ... cleaning the registry doesn't seem to work since the same issues show up on the next scan - Nero ... well Nero StartSmart doesn't work, but everything else does - Logitech Webcam (QuickCam Communicate) -- logitech is too lame to make vista drivers --- they've lost many customers. Everything else seems perfect |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|